patswhiponthebills

good lord--this is r.pereira acting up again(usually found on bufrange). when he/she is not dreaming about bledsoes meatstick being up inside his/her intestinal area,she/he is usually acting up instead. she/he is a bledsoe groupie and never was a bills fan

thats horrible-- now she wont get to see the pats win there 4th superbowl in 5 years.

stop stop stop,the entire team started playing better.it wasnt wm. wm averaged 3.8 ypc for a large part of the season he played until that pitt game(against 3rd stringers) when he finally rounded out his ypa to 4.0 for the season. the entire team got better.

drew has a TON of attempts for a ypa that reeks of,well it reeks of mediocrity.and most of drews yardage never comes when the game is on the line.9th all time in yards but 7th all time in attempts also reeks of INEFFICIENT.

law got paid most of his HUGE contract (who ever pays one player that much money that he was suppose to get this year is retarded,especially since they won without him and he had a bad injury) brown has been paid QUITE well over the years for average play(getting paid #1 receiver type $). milloy got paid huge bucks until he started half-assing it on the field his last year and a half as a pat and because of it,was asked to take a cut(still would have made a lot of cash even after the cut). phifer=old and mediocre play. woody was asking for 2 much money--detroit FOOLISHLY paid this clown what he wanted,then this pig comes in 40 pounds out of shape and was never the same(way to go woody).pats knew enough not to pay him ridiculous $$ for the position he played(remember he go moved from the center spot because there was somethings he couldnt do).and his replacement hotchstein(sp) did a fabulous job of not given up a single sack vs tenn,indy,and carolina in the playoffs(woody was injured). the coaches did not jump ship cause they couldnt stand the place,they left cause they FINALLY got well earned head coaching jobs.mangini is taking over the defense and the players love this guy and always talk highly of him. wiggens(wiggins?) finally had a good game vs oak in the snow game,but you dont give out contracts based on one game. but he is a decent player. bledsoe got dealt because there ended up being a better player at the same position,simple as that. why would they keep him around for? a lot of these things mentioned above happen to a lot of teams there is no locker room termoil what so ever,the players love it in pats land and there coaches.

actually the offense did not change that much at all after brady came in for drew.pretty much the same plays were called. pats did not have down the field threats so there were no deep 20+ yards routes.the only one that could get open once in a great while past 15 yards was paten(glenn was hurt). watch the first game of the year vs cinn and the 2nd vs the jets,lots of short routes. ---anyways,god bless MO lewis

she's going to have a serious battle with the toilet later on.

should have won this game??? i want what your smoking. there were mistakes because the pats CAUSED them.did you miss the parts were the pats dropped 2-3 really easy int's that were right in there hands.did you miss the crazy fumble from brady that was caused by his own player? pats hurt themselves. n.e should have won by atleast 3 td's for the guy hoping that the pats get into a bus crash,,,you really are a piece of garbage.

margin of victory counts towards the dynasty label??? so your looking for style points over actual efficiency??? brilliant.listen there were 2 really good teams in the sb,give credit. i guess you decided to ignore the beating indy and pitt took then. IGNORE THE FACT THAT THE pats hurt themselves in this superbowl by dropping a few INCREDIBLY EASY int's that should of broke this game WIDE open,GO AHEAD and ignore the bizzare play were brady fumbled on the goalline when faulk hit the ball by accident with his own elbow,that probably cost them another 7 points. ALSO ignore the fact that it could have been a blowout in last years superbowl BUT both the pats starting safetys went down with injuries when they had a double digit lead. bills just had no clutch ability in the big games,they turned into frogs once the spotlight was on them.losing that first superbowl to jeff hostetler(sp) and a old lawrence taylor lead defense is just terrible. as for future hall of famers-its still early to tell,but i think brady,harrison,milloy,(was there for much of his career and helped win the first one) law, maybe seymour(time will tell) maybe dillon(with a few more dominant years)? maybe vinateri(dont act he dont count either) all have a great chance. theres 7 potential ones right there. big ted washington was a big reason for one of those titles and could be a hof,might not g in as a pat obviously,BUT he is a hof that was on this pats team that was important for a title. bruschi has an outside chance.if lynn swann can get in with very mediocre career numbers,then maybe somebody else can.even though bruschi at this point is great and i dont think swann was ever really great over a sustained period of time like brusch has for the last few years.

complete BS. were are those pitt teams from the 70's more talented? law and harrison are great NUFF SAID(asante and wilson are VERY talented?) i think most would take dillon and brady as there qb and rb over franco and bradshaw(guy who finished his career wih 2 more td passes then int's 212-210).branch is very talented,givens, brown plays different positions. seymour is dominant,bruschi is very talented. ect ect ect. and if those 2 teams were to match up as is,pats would flat out crush them. there bigger,stronger, faster,more dominant.pats d-line would outweigh pitts o-line by probably 40 pounds per man. --pitts best receiver is more famous for a few crazy catches (swann) then his actual skill. and before i go,talent ACTUALLY has nothing to do with how good you are,i seen guys run 4.3 40's and not be able to do anything on a football field. or guys with a 40 inch vertical leap play like garbage. you can be very talented,it has nothing to do with how good of a football player you will be winning in todays nfl is more difficult then any other era and is more impressive. you still have your 4-5 teams that are impressive(just like before the cap days). except the rest of the teams are a little better. in the 70's,there was probably 4-5 really good teams(like in this era) BUT the REST of the teams in the 70's(80's also) blew BRAIN FARTS.after the 4-5 great teams,the rest of the teams were so HORRIBLY below average,the game was over once that bad teams foot hit the ground after they got off the bus back before the salary cap days.

best runner,i mean just runner.not blocking, receiving, blitz pickup ect.. the best runner is sanders and its not even close. this guy averaged 5.0 ypc (for his CAREER) in this generation and he did not exactly have the best o-line. if this guy was in jim browns era,barrys ypc would be around 6.5-7.0 EASILY. theres some safetys from todays nfl that were bigger then some of the down lineman from browns era. its like this in all sports,guys are bigger,stronger,and faster(especially in football) p.s-i dont think that barry was that bad of a blocker.

bs,brady was very deserving of both awards,how do you think adam got in position in the first place to even attempt a kick? brady and the offense got him there. adam is out there for 3 seconds tops. adam failed on 2 kicks in last years game

drew came into that game with a 7-0 lead and the ball ALREADY at the pitt 40 yard line,and a first down(thanks to bradys last pass wich was a 26 yard dart to brown before he was cheap shot).drew was put into a great situation. brady was just starting to get on a roll before he was injured,he left the game 12-18. if tom never gets hurt,i would bet anything that the pats win by atleast 17 points. drew hit his first 3 passes then went 7-18 and finished the game 10-21(puke) and should have easily been picked off twice and both should have been brought back for pitt td's. the pats won in SPITE of drew and his terrible play. pats dont win c_h_i_t if this guy and his terrible big game play was the starter in n.e the past 4 years.NUFF SAID

patten,branch,seymour,bruschi,johnson, dillon,givens,harrison,wilson,samuel, izzo,johnson,faulk are not great athletes??? dont be completely foolish and pretend there not. and what does athletic ability have to do with being a actual good football player in the first place???? the only one that i would consider a over the top great athlets out of the philly receivers is t.o, and he's hurt. if philly was in the afc they would not even be in the super bowl in the first place,and philly would have no probowlers in there secondary if they were in th afc. the only reason they got probowlers in philly's secondary is because its the weak nfc

little better then pittsburgh? didnt pitt already destroy philly?

i will always love you-whitney houston J/K i'd say crazy train, runnin with devil, and kashmir

pats stopped at 20 points,and btw,20 points in those horrible conditions is pretty good. first of all,the pats already had a week to prepare for pitt earlier in the season.you dont think the pats learned some things from the last time they played pitt? its a different part of the season now. and i would bet anything that the n.e coaching staff has been (in a way)preparing for pitt since these playoffs began.i doubt that belichick was expecting to play the jets in the playoffs in the afcecg. they will plan for this harder then ever. with a healthy dillon and branch thrown in for this game. and a much improved game plan on defense and pre-paring harder this time against pitt. belichicks record in rematches is incredible. again,im sure belichick and the boys have been pre-paring for pitt since the last time they seen them,knowing they will most likely face them again. ben fraudlisberger must have stayed in church praying for hours today to the football gods allowing the steelers to squeak by the jets.