leh-nerd skin-erd

Damn OT, a person who disavows their child because of their political affiliation (or where they live, who they love etc) is an empty vessel. Miserable.

Don’t be a victim, this is a safe space for all.

Ahh man, you literally railed against the douche baggery of the board two posts up and then you accuse the DR of being a cult-leading-killer want ta be...wan um bee..want tooby...whatever. Thats pure horse-cockery!

Honestly. What kind of *&^%ing stupid follow up question from this bobble-headed mofo is "Just to be clear...should people, I guess, accept the risk that they could become ill...?". Who in America doesn't know generally that there is a risk that they could become ill? I just can't imagine going home at night and thinking "I cracked the code and got right to it today.".

Pinky Tuscadero.

More evidence of Trump and his damndable lies lies lies!! Oh wait, wrong pandemic. $#@! Wilson! I take your point, but I'm less interested in a battling press, much more interested in fair and accurate. Thankfully, we have choices in that regard and don't have to rely on traditional sources.

Me neither, and I don't recall anyone criticizing him prior to the evidence being uncovered.

I always used to wonder why the Son of Sam killer wasn't arrested before the evidence of his guilt was uncovered.

It's not that you disturbed me, I didn't cite the German study. Also, candidly, I attempted to interact with you previously, answered some questions you posed and you chose not to respond. When I asked again, you chose not to respond. That's perfectly fine, of course, but given your posting history of insults, innuendo and half/no truths, it just seemed odd that you would inquire of me as to whom the leader of Germany is. Everyone knows it's Werner Klemperer. In summary, if you're interested in lobbying insults throwing out questions and ignoring the follow up, there's nothing to be gained for either of us.

She's strawberry blonde, that's how they get ya. I never said she wasn't breathtakingly beautiful and that for a moment I get tongue-tied and consider submission like @shoshin. And, do I consider what's going on under the exquisitely tailored European (obviously) suit? Yes, I do. Sue me. I'm just a man, dammit.

No need to make it personal Sport. I'm a citizen, just like you are. I'm not interested in power over anyone, I'm primarily interested in making decisions that are in the best interest of myself and my family. I'm not threatening anyone with violence, I'm not hunkering down and claiming "they're out to get me", I'm just minding my business and living my life. I support your right to voluntarily comply with the seemingly compulsory program, why mock me for exercising my rights? I simply questioned the implementation of the program as is, the "random" nature of the program based on your reply on the subject at hand, and people showing up at my door under false pretenses, with uniformed individuals giving a decidedly authoritarian vibe to it.

You’re asking the wrong poster, Mein Kempf.

So, my name is generated randomly and added to a list. My doctor must be excluded as the point of contact because it takes away from the randomness of my name being on the list? A team is dispatched to my home, and since my name appeared on the list, everyone in the house who’s name was not randomly generated is also pressured for a blood draw? If I’m uncomfortable, do I tell the guy in the haz mat suit and needle, the icy woman with steel blue eyes in tailored business suit with the official paperwork, or the two guys in the police uniforms with the tazers in the holsters? Oddly, I do not feel more comfortable hearing the Fatherland is running a similar program, but you enjoy the experience.

That’s an oversimplification of the problem. If the story is accurate, they have a team of individuals showing up at your home, some in quasi-paramilitary gear with “official papers”, suggesting that for the greater good you offer your family up for a blood draw? They rely on psychology and theatrics to manipulate people into believing submitting is compulsory? In 2020?? If only there was a way where the government could reach out quickly and efficiently to the masses for volunteers, set up a professional screening center with a visitors bureau, offer an explanation of the process on a small, high quality hand-held monitor and a sanitary blood draw station. Instead, the geniuses have launched a program with a decidedly Mediziniche Aufzeichnungen feel to it. . My response might not be as visceral as some, but I’m no less inclined to tell them leave me and mine alone and if they truky feel the program is worthwhile, reach out to me through my physician’s office.

Rich boy.

This is why men are so confused these days. You women all want to get so yappity-dappity when the poor bastard forgets to pick up flowers on Valentines day, but when a guy who just happened to shut down a hemisphere needs to see his lady, to share his feelings and just talk...he's the subject of mockery. Men hurt too. I guess when you are all self-sufficient and can skin your own goats, no room for romance anymore, huh BG? #sad

A few years back, I was volunteering at a high school wrestling tournament. A friend of mine is a politically connected attorney from downstate NY, who sort of exemplifies the stereotypical metro NY mindset. He's loud, shares his opinions freely and speaks his mind. Anyway, he was working the bracket table, announcing which wrestlers went to which mats, who was on deck and who was 'in the hole'. Lather, rinse, repeat. "RHINO, WEST SENECA WEST, YOU'RE UP MAT 1. 3RD, MARYVALE, ON DECK, MAT 1. TIBERIUS...MAT 1, IN THE HOLE!'.". Anyway, this one guy rolled up on the table complaining that he had not heard his wrestler's name called. I was looking though the brackets, trying to do what I generally do in life, which is solve problems and not take things personally. My friend gets done with his latest call, the coach in front of me looks at him and says rather forcefully "Look, this is the second time our coaches didn't hear the announcement, and our kids are out there warming up and we don't know it!". My friend looked at him, looked at me, and said in a voice loud enough for everyone to hear "I DON'T CARE." and got back to calling names. The coach looked startled, looked back at me and I shrugged my shoulders and said "We're calling the name's coach, you guys have to pay attention.". To this day, that makes me laugh just to think about it. Every now and again I text my friend and start with "I DON'T CARE". To him, it's a perfectly natural and comfortable response, to me, it would be like wearing wool underwear. I bring it up because it seems fairly obvious that's Trump's response, and where someone like Kemp is concerned, it's probably the appropriate response. Seriously...these people walked in lockstep with Russian collusion for three years and should be ashamed they were duped so badly by their guys. It wasn't Trump's doing, it was the politicians they will line up to vote for again...and again...and again...and again. @Kemp and the like = Alice the Goon.

Thank you. I think we agree then, his response was appropriate and proportional to the accusations.

Hmm. If you believed that the Benghazi video back story was accidentally created, I see your point. If you believe that the Russia investigation really just boiled down to a series of unfortunate events spanning a 4 year period, I can see your point. If you believe that the majority of American political candidates over the past few decades have spoke eloquently on the need to resolve the obvious issues at the southern border, only to errantly forget to address it over a 2, 4 or 8+ year term(s), I certainly follow you. But therein lies the rub--since we disagree on these fundamental issues, there can be no common ground to be found, and your definition of dignified behavior is largely irrelevant. The concept of dignity is a myth, though I would acknowledge that superficially, Joe Biden may have appeared Senatorial--and thus, on some level, dignified-- just prior to and immediately after sniffing hair/groping women/fishhooking staffers in back alleys. Of course, I don't know what you think the appropriate dignified response and demeanor of a sitting president should be to being accused of treason by the opposition party because you errantly missed that part of my reply. No worries though, I expected things would go this way, they generally do. Apologies to all for taking this off topic, I'm like one of the Four Wise Men, asking questions when people raise an issue, only to find that to certain questions there are no answers.

Hogwash. W. Bush, according to logic, liberals and Barrack Obama manufactured a war out of thin air, sent American men and women to die and was also responsible or the deaths of many, many innocents abroad as a result. In most part of the world, he would be correctly labelled a war criminal for his actions as described. Barrack Obama, according to historical record, spearheaded the assault in Libya, which resulted in the deaths of innocents, acted as an agent of regime change and due to his actions generally, was directly responsible to the emergence of ISIS. Later, he was directly responsible for the deaths of American citizens in Libya, and when things went south, he created a backstory to deflect blame for his missteps and which served as a propaganda puff piece served to the American voter. Both presidents sat back and allowed the southern border to fester on their watch, both by extension oversaw the death and victimization of perhaps hundreds of thousands of citizens on both sides of the border. It remains to be seen their actions were prompted by apathy, greed or something darker, but the facts remain. Finally, as the Russia hoax unfolded over a nearly 4 year period, started under the watch of Barrack Obama, replete with broken rules, broken regulations, lies to the FISA court and a cast of unscrupulous characters the likes of which are often seen in a James Bond thriller, it became clear to many that there was an active, sustained attempt to undue an election. As Barrack Obama rode off into the sunset, a massive plume of carbon emissions following in his wake, he was oddly silent on the investigation. W. Bush, he the man calling for peace and tranquility as we battle the virus together, remained silent as well. There are more examples of course, but based on my measure, none of these activities equate to anything close to 'respect' for the highest office in the land. There's no such thing, it's a myth. I'll ask you the same question I ask all the other high-falootin' presidential decorum advocates: What is the appropriate response to being called treasonous by members of the opposition party, to an attempt to unseat him from office, to unfounded allegations being made that threaten the individual, his wife, his children and anyone in his circle?

Do you own a Giglio service for wealthy older women in South Beach? If so I think you missed out here.

I have a friend who is a former LEO. Honorable guy, most definitely tough enough that he doesn't need to prove he's tough enough. The game here was lost when they dragged the original guy down to the ground like a pack of hyenas, and assuming this was actually a scenario where that guy was within 4.5 feet of others, would be the sort of thing that my friend suggests represented a total loss of control by the police. Ugly &^^$ will get uglier as the temperature increases and the willingness of people to be treated like sheep decreases.

I think he's a horrible communicator, he seems to think every person listening is an adult with special needs. I gave him credit in the early days for getting out and speaking to citizens directly under difficult circumstances. He was dealt a losing hand from the start, and while I personally think he's a total douche, I tried to be reasonable and factor that into the equation. In the near calm light of day as the crisis moves on, any reasonable analysis points to a massive leadership void from the get go. In retrospect, he should have acted more quickly, marginalized DiBlasio, taken control and locked NYC down. He should have had the state much better prepared to face the pandemic w/ respect to ventilators, hospital readiness and expansion capabilities. As luck would have it, the feds bailed him out. All of this comes under the recognition that in a free society, bad ***** can happen sometimes.

Nah nah nah ho-ho-ho'don a second. Your stunning, almost incalculable hypocrisy while pledging you support to a person who is a gross caricature of a powerful Washington insider who has taken liberties with women for decades, and stands accused of a horrific crime against a female member of his team, not withstanding, your story has evolved. You suggested previously that President Trump told people to inject the bleach themselves. Now you're suggesting he commissioned scientists "look into it". Which was the lie? Check the transcript of your PresidentTrump's comments and let us know. It should be easy.

Thanks for posting this breaking news about the dangers of tuning in to caucasian male talk show hosts. I found a separate article that I thought is on point as well. University of California at Berkley study finds statistical evidence suggesting that “greater viewership of Hannity relative to Leave It To Beaver reruns is strongly associated with a greater number of COVID-19 cases and deaths in the early stages of the pandemic” WRITTEN BY HOLDEN MAGROIN PUBLISHED 04/22/20 1:51 PM EDT According to the article, the study authors “calculate that Fox viewers who watched Hannity rather than Beaver were less likely to adhere to social distancing rules, and that areas where more people watched Hannity relative to Beaver had higher local rates of infection and death.” Researchers suggest that in spite of the dangers associated with COVID-19, there is no data that suggests Beaver watchers have any greater risk of catching the virus than the population as a whole. "Our message to the American people is clear, and it's good news for most. Enjoy all the Beaver you can, it's completely safe." said lead researcher C. Howett Fealz.