Gene Frenkle

Beautiful logic, refute the paper by slamming the University. Nice analysis.

RIIIGHT...why should a founding member of the AFL and a 45-year owner who helped keep HOF'er Al Davis in the league and was instrumental in shaping the modern NFL get into the HOF?

Such open minds around here!

Link?

You're still convinced I'm Tennyboy? Well, that certainly proves that you don't know what you're talking about.

How about actually looking at the stats and conclusions and refuting what was found instead of saying "It's from Berkley, so it must be wrong!" This is a statistical analysis based on freely available public records. Numbers can be manipulated, true, but this is not an opinion piece, it's a mathematical interpretation of statistical data. Either their argument is statistically viable or it is not. If you believe it is not, then by all means, show why it is not. You're argument is the equilavent of many here who slammed Fahrenheit 9/11 for being full of lies without even seeing the movie. They may be correct, but they're automatic knee-jerk reaction ensures that they will never really know one way or another. I'd expect more from a self-proclaimed free-thinker such as yourself.

Ladies and gentlemen, our first (of likely many) sub-5-minute analysis of the data presented. "After carefully reviewing the findings, I say this is BS!" I wonder how long your mouse pointer hovered over the 'Add Reply' button before you just had to click? Why do I even bother?

I can almost see the responses in my mind as I type this... Yes, it's from Berkely, but the findings are rather interesting if you actually look at the analysis. Front Page Summary (pdf) Take it for what it's worth, Bushies. I'm sure you've already dismissed it.

Ahhhhh, soundbites... Spin, spin, spin...

By your screen name, I'm assuming your in California. If that's the case, the Democrats do not need your vote. Personally, I find that affiliating oneself with a particualar party leads to narrow-minded partisan thinking. I'm a registerd Independent and simply wish that people would think for themselves instead of voting along party lines. Finally, something I agree with!

Don't flatter yourself, tough guy. Grow a pair! You sound like a pansy-ass liberal! It was more like a 'who are you' in a 'why should I care what you think' kind of way. I'm not the type to get all bent out of shape about what gets said on an internet message board (unlike some I know ). I'm certainly not going to take anything up in a parking lot unless you do something that is really out of line (or I'm really drunk) - especially not with a Bills fan, which I assume you are.

Post of the day. I couldn't agree more! I'd even support the team if ICE was the GM.

Nope, I'm not sure where you live, but as a season ticket holder, the most important thing to me it keeping this team in Buffalo so I can go to the stadium 8 times per year, get drunk, and cheer on the boys. I'd rather see a crappy team in Buffalo than a Super Bowl champion in LA. I guess you don't see it that way.

Once again, my spelling should be better in the future thanks to Alaska Darin. A to tha mutha fukin D!

Not really. Who are you again?

All it shows is that the fans in Buffalo are second to none. They support their team through thick and thin, and despite what you may think about some of TD's decisions, you can't fault the guy for rebuilding a dying fan base. If this keeps up, the Bills will be in Buffalo for years to come, and that is really the most important thing, despite what many Monday morning GMs may think.

Yup, use image maps.

What are opinions like again?

Yes, that's the one, smartass. My political views are quite as partisan as some here. I'd rather make up my own mind than drink the Kool-Aid over and over again. I know a bad idea when I see one, just as I know a dumb president when I hear one. Keep on routing for the Republicans, though.

And the Bills players would probably care even less than the posters you are referring to, "WingNut".

I didn't say that the Republican party is not intelligent, just Dubya. You're on a tear today. Not that I'm trying to start anything, but I've noticed that you usually seem to log on, post feverishly for 30-60 minutes, and then disappear again. It's easy to notice because at times you'll be the last person to post in the 10 most recent threads or so. This seems to happen several times per day. What gives?

Yes, no child left behind. What a great idea.

Facts suck. Realizing this, however, makes them no less factual as time goes on.