Gene Frenkle

Yes, Ben Affleck is a genius.

As always, your source of news is both fair and balanced. I like it 'cause it supports my worldview!!!

Stats are for losers!

Nah, I'm pretty flexible. Was that a pickup line? Sorry - I don't swing that way, I just believe in equal rights for all.

Try reading his post and then defend the content. 1. He uses a BS statistic "many many times the rate of abuse", with no supporting numbers or links. 2. He then (again without any supporting facts) says that kids are better off with both genders of parents to learn from. This may be true or not. There's just no supporting anything. Plus, where does this leave kids with only one parent - better or worse off than adoptees of gay parents? How about kids that would live their lives in the foster system if gay adoption were not allowed? 3. He then goes into some outlandish, unlikely scenario in which he marries his best friend for the health insurance and then adopts a teenage daughter to abuse. (and the gays have a higher rate of abuse?) 4. And finally (and predictably) the 'not that there's anything wrong with gays' gem. There's nothing wrong with thinking that gays should not be allowed to marry or adopt, provided you have well-thought-out reasons for your opinion. In fact, feel free to be a bigot - it's a free country. I only have a problem with the deceptive and foolish manner in which that opinion is being presented here.

She may actually have to start expelling sh-- from a more traditional orifice.

I'd like to say that we are rarely treated to such retarded and nonsensical logic. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Yes, marrying your straight friend and then adopting a teenage daughter to abuse would technically make you both gay and a pervert.

You want to get rid of all the queers just so you can tell people you're gay?

Oh, this is just sad.

Yes, no matter how despicable the actions of our enemies might be, we should follow the 'eye for an eye' policy and give it right back to them (only worse)! What better way to promote our democratic values? The end ALWAYS justifies the means. For that matter, what better way to promote our Christian values? !@#$in libtards.

Choo choo...All Aboard!

Mike Robitaille would be proud of that pinstripe suit!

I remember he was discussed for the Buffalo job the year we ended up hiring Mularkey (I think). I also remember he didn't even want to come to Buffalo for the interview. He was only interested in the NYG job. I'm with you, though, I'd love to have as Super Bowl winning coach like Coughlin here. Have we ever had a coach who has won a Super Bowl? I'm pretty sure we haven't.

Awesome! Only a week off...

Also, Eric Moulds is a bust, and Kelly should be benched for Reich. Hindsight is 20/20. Any other premature overreactions I'm missing? Fun game today!

Communist!

I'll have take your word on that. Red flags are raised for me when someone like yourself talks about the beauty of dividend cuts, no offense intended. I just imagine that how you make your living might bias your opinion there, but again, I really don't know. It still seems to me that he spent money like a drunken sailor for the better part of the past 8 years. I really don't think that point gets made enough.

I don't know - I was barely paying attention back then. I know that Clinton had the .com bubble to help his cause, but Bush also had the housing bubble for a time, whatever that's worth. Just looking the numbers, Clinton looks like a fiscal conservative, while Bush looks like the biggest free-spending liberal in recent history. The amount our country owed then vs. now is staggering, not to mention the fact that our national debt was actually decreasing every year under Bubba. I guess Clinton didn't start two wars either, so that probably helped the bottom line. Bush is certainly more of a social conservative, but I really couldn't care less about that. Anyway, the discrepancy in our national debt, year to year, is too great to be explained by luck. In all seriousness, what do you think? I know you know a lot more about these financial issues than I do.

Lucky for 8 years - fair enough I guess. Does that make Bush extremely unlucky? As the saying goes, you make your own luck.

She should have gotten the chair!

When we had a good economy and a surplus every year.

awesome

I'm not sure that this has been expressed concisely enough so here goes: WHO THE !@#$ CARES?

If I haven't by now, I'm not going to anytime soon. Feel free to jump off the bus, just watch that you don't get run over. Loyalty is not conditional for Bills fans, young man (or there would be none left).

I'll be freezing my ass off in the tunnel endzone as usual!