GG

Tell that to the cackle calling for more Russia investigations.

WTF, Larry the Cucumber is here again?

I'm rubber, you're glue. Part of the TDS is the Dems' inability to recognize that all these investigations are far more likely to blow up in their faces than to get anything tangible on Trump. But, carry on.

Wait til 6AM tomorrow after his shot of Ovaltine

I can't believe I'm on Greggy's side of this ridiculous argument.

Let me get this straight. Trump's juvenile comments about being wiretapped are cause for alarm, but evidence that his communications may have been illegally obtained is no big deal. Does that sum up your point?

Part of the dissonance. It's ok to use third-grade analogies, except when it comes to trump and then it's a crisis

I believe that British euphemism for Asian is anyone from Asia, which is not limited to East Asia

Considering that this is critical to the debate at hand, maybe you should elaborate, or stay out of the conversation?

It's a gift

Then maybe you can explain the legality of this incidental capture of communications between two US citizens, and exactly how Trump's communications fall under FISA orders?

The question was - how can Trump's communication be incidentally obtained?

Newbies should also know that linking anything other than primary sources are subject to extreme ridicule.

Please tell me how it's possible to "incidentally" pick up Trump's conversations, if the targets were foreigners communicating with members of his team?

Imagine if he had a water balloon and no SUV

I'll take your weathervane Comey and double it with a shot of Nunes.

So you do admit that Trump was wiretapped?

Over time you will learn that "agree to disagree" is not acceptable on this forum. Meanwhile, back to the original topic at hand, it appears that Mr. Nunes just threw another monkey wrench into the Dem talking points memos.

There already is a basic level of universal care, because hospitals do not turn patients down. It's not extremely efficient, but is still better than a nationalized health service that will result in worse service for the vast majority of the population. The move to a single payer isn't as inevitable as you think. As more of the worlds' nationalized healthcare plans teeter towards economic collapse, it will give more ammunition to opponents of nationalized healthcare.

The point was made about the Brits calling it a terror attack, which they all are.

So in effect you're advocating a market based solution to reduce the need for healthcare, as the primary method of controlling costs. Which is completely different than believing the fairy tale that if you throw healthcare under the government umbrella, service will get better and cheaper.

Even The friggin Guardian is calling it a terror attack, so my guess is that you're wrong.

Your statement is the equivalent of finding the one out five dentists who would recommend a sugar-laced gum. Please point me to a doctor who hasn't advised a healthier lifestyle to an overweight person or a smoker in the last 30 years? And how far has that preventative care advice gone? You have to be gator level stupid to not know how bad smoking is for you, and smoking levels have gone down dramatically in the last 30 years. Yet, here we are.

You can blame Americans for the biggest reason for the bloated cost of healthcare in the US. Good luck getting preventative care to stick.

Did you study access to healthcare or timely access to healthcare? There's never, ever such a thing as a free lunch.