dickleyjones
-
Posts
697 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by dickleyjones
-
-
17 minutes ago, 1onemangang7 said:
oh, well glad you asked. Cause there has been 57 super bowls and not one has been won by a running quarterback. Josh Allen running is the Bills identity because the brain trust hasnt given him a runner to compliment him. Need a big play?, Josh's legs...short yardage? All Josh. Best runner on the team, Josh Allen. Maybe after the Dallas game Cook caught a little attention from opposing coordinators. Usually he's ignored and will spurt a few before a couple negative plays that puts them behind the chains, and Josh is looked to for the bail out. 4th quarter to run the clock out? looks like Johnson won that job if the Pittsburgh game is any indicator. Idk why they just dont give him the lions share of the carries during the game. Bottom line a running quarterback only gets you so far as determined by the history of the NFL.
there have been 57 super bowls and not one has been won by Buffalo. guess we should all just give up.
damned statistics creating reality again!
-
7 minutes ago, SoonerBillsFan said:
Put him on Kelsey and blitz kermit.
blitzing mahomes is unwise.
-
8
-
-
6 hours ago, ShipUPride said:
He's been invisible for weeks. Today I saw him catch a ball and drop to the ground before getting touched, without effort for YAC. Unless he is secretly injured I think it's time to really evaluate his effectiveness and effort.
Sorry to say...
U R dum
-
The PI was the right play once he was beat. He prevented a TD that play.
Then he prevented the TD on that drive with the int.
Both smart plays. I hope he can improve in other areas because he has a real knack for interceptions.
-
6
-
1
-
2
-
-
i agree elam is tbd. he has been injured all year. knowing this staff's penchant for training corners i think he will succeed in the end. sure would be cool if he does!
-
1
-
1
-
-
The patriots wind game had a bad outcome. But we learned something: Josh can throw in that wind. We figured it out too late in that game but going forward we should not fear the wind.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, WNYFAN1 said:
All week all we heard on this board and Buff media was how depleted Miami's defense was.
Bills O scored 14.
So is your conclusion that Miami's defense was in fact not depleted?
-
1 minute ago, Buffalo03 said:
They didn't even look that good against the Cowboys. If the Cowboys didn't screw up that opening drive, they would have won that game.
Maybe, maybe not. We will never know all we know is the dolphins bested the cowboys.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, QB Bills said:
Talented guy but dumb as a bag of rocks. He's the kind of mental midget that loses you games.
...or wins you games.
-
44 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:
It seems Baltimore, Miami remains to be seen. Cleveland maybe. Texas possibly? The rest are just mush.
The bills? I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who think bills will 100% beat the woeful 3-11 pats.
At best it's 50/50 imho.
It's always 50/50
-
Join us on the high seas matey, 'tis most convenient.
-
1
-
-
1% is probable? Sweet, i'm off to the casino putting it all on black 35.
-
18 hours ago, hondo in seattle said:
100 years ago, what Araiza did wouldn't have been a crime. Or a thousand years ago. Or a million years ago. History is filled with young people having sex.
It also wouldn't have been a crime in most states. From what I just found on the internet, the age of consent is 16 in 32 states. It's 17 in 8 more.
New morality? Sexual morality is highly variable from culture to culture. What Araiza did wouldn't be considered immoral in many places on the earth today.
I have two daughters and I'm glad we have age-of-consent laws in the U.S. I just think Araiza has been punished enough.
I agree that based on the info we have, Araiza has very likely been punished enough. We will never know.
But something being legal or acceptable in the past does not make it ok today. At all. Wtf kind of argument is that? Slavery (and many other terrible things) was legal 200 years ago, and is acceptable in some countries today, so it's ok?
The law is the law, cross the line don't be surprised if you get burned.
-
1 hour ago, Bob Jones said:
LAMP
Your post is more lampy than op's, well done!
-
1
-
-
When that play happened i wasn't too worried as i saw the yellow right from the get go. Didn't see our guys jump so it must have been the Chiefs.
Quite possible some players thought the same in the moment and played differently thus allowing the TD. That happens pretty often. Not that it should...play to the whistle and all...but it happens.
-
18 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said:
It wouldn't be my first choice (Ben Johnson) but I could live with Brady as HC and keeping Beane. I just can't look at McDermott's face anymore.
So you just gonna listen to the radio broadcasts for the next several years then?
-
4 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:
Your entire point is that kids sometimes do what they are not supposed to do? Why even mention something so obvious?
my entire point in that single post in response to Bill which was specifically about how "libraries are the one place..." was that libraries are not as locked down as he stated.
-
8 minutes ago, aristocrat said:
lol what an argument. Kids find ways to get cigarettes, booze, porn illegally so what exactly is your point?
it is a response to Bill's point about libraries and that is all it is. my goodness has no one used an internet forum before? must every post relate directly to the OP?
-
10 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:
You do realize this is not an argument against the law, correct? Using your logic we should let teachers show hard core porn and give kids alcohol because kids can figure out how to access it anyways.
sure? sometimes on internet forums you get a little off the main topic discussing side points. I was responding to BillFanNC's contention that the library "is the one place kids can't access internet porn".
My logic says knowing kids have access means we should probably open some dialogue with them about what they have access to to help minimize harm. for example it was often the kids whose parents refuse to discuss alcohol, or have any difficult conversations with their kids, who became the drunkest teenagers. besides, of course, that rare ultra permissive parent who is probably an alcoholic themselves. Uh oh, now we are discussing alcohol, i hope we didn't break any internet rules...but if we did it is your fault you brought it up.
-
12 hours ago, Magox said:
If you don't believe there was plenty of substance to the debate and you want to focus on a poop bag rather than all the stats he was rattling off then that means you came into with a preconceived dislike for him and no matter what he was going to say you wouldn't support.
There are plenty of voters like you who don't really care about the cultural issues that helps create the rot in our societies and as a father of two girls that are in school, I care very deeply about all the things that schools and corporations are doing to inject ideologies that aren't rooted in science and that are created to help indoctrinate these minds into believing things such as Critical Race theory, faux DEI concepts, transgendered males competing against women, corporations attempting to run roughshod over politicians and a number of other things.
I'm Floridian, so I'm biased for DeSantis but I can tell you this, I was never biased for Rick Scott, Jeb Bush, Charlie Crist back when he was a Republican. What DeSantis did during COVID and all the bold items that he promised and delivered on, I'm thankful. I feel like what he was able to accomplish specially COVID that I am indebted to him.
He'll very likely lose and Trump will be the nominee, but I am 100% convinced he would end up being a much more disciplined, energetic, organized and effective executive than anyone else running on either side of the aisle.
there was plenty of substance, sure. but that won't sway the Ds and Rs much if at all. it's the independents that I consider when judging the way these two present themselves. i admit i have seen DeSantis debate a couple of times recently and both times i thought he came off poorly and this reaffirmed my opinion.
i do care about cultural issues, but again i'm not judging these two on issues. we know where Ds and Rs stand.
i agree with you about COVID, i don't know every detail of how Florida handled it but i know that the governments did a lot of damage in Canada in the name of "saving the healthcare system". they did the exact opposite. in Florida i know they lifted restrictions earlier which was good and DeSantis gets points for that.
and you may be correct about his effectiveness when in office. my interest is political strategy. does the guy really have what it takes to win the presidency? i don't think he does, it's not his policy, it's the way he performs on a microphone. and again i'm not saying that is good for society but it is the reality.
-
15 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:
You know one place kids cant access internet porn?
A school library.
i doubt that, actually. kids are pretty resourceful. depends on the IT person at the library.
-
6 hours ago, Doc said:
Did you understand the reason why he used the poop map?
i think so. not saying he is wrong. just saying i think it's a mistake because it looked bad.
-
8 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:
Poop map at a debate is a bridge too far but comics in elementary school libraries depicting giving head are fine.
Oh, Canada 🤦♂️🤦🤦♀️
My criticism is not about what i personally find offensive. It is about what i think is a good or bad political move on a debate stage.
There are books written for 2 year olds about poop and i bet you will find many in libraries. Which kinda highlights my point - the poop map was childish and makes DeSantis look weak at best, poopy at worst.
-
2 hours ago, Doc said:
Well, when you're an outsider, things like "likeability" are more important than competence.
Unfortunately, likeability is often more important than competence to the people that matter: the voters. that's a bad thing, but as an outsider that's what i look for when trying to gauge what i think your country will do.
And i am interested in what your country does because arguably your elections affect Canada more than our own elections do.
What kind of GDT poster are you
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
im more of a game day shout box guy. i keep a level head and mock those who say "game over" because something bad happened. i enjoy watching the games and seeing great plays from both teams, seeinh great strategies, etc. i want the Bills to win but i know every game is 50/50 so i don't get bent out of shape if they lose. i have a harder time sleeping after an awesome win.