Doza

Look, I know a loss hurts but wanting a change for changes sake is not the answer. Henry is a great back, GREAT. Top 10 in the league, maybe top 5. You wanna bench him because of one or two falls? For an unproven back with a gimp leg? Are you people crazy???

Something tells me that if McGahee actually showed that he was a better back in practice he'd be in there. Fact is, the Bills are playing the best back they have.

Remember Bruchi and Seymour got through. Looks like the whole side of the failed to make a play. I still think McGahee or Henry with a power rush up the middle, ya can make the first down. Right right at the rookie Wilfork.

So you have Henry running pretty well. 4th down, why not try to bring your biggest fattest guys in and get the yard? Heck even a QB sneak is good, Bledsoe is pretty good at those. Gotta question that playcalling! Have to hand it to the Bills they had the Pats on their heels all game. A couple of fluke plays both ways. I am not looking forward to the next game between these two teams.

Ther eis no question that the Jags D did contain the Bills in a dominating fastion holding the Bills to just 10 points. Guess what... turnovers and sacks count. You call that "luck" I call it good D. Smae with the Bills. Their D was dominating all game, except on the last drive. But in no way was the Bills O dominating in any way shape or form. And its clearly obvious that this needs to be pointed out because (if you remember the original discussion) the whole thing was about the offensive "dominance" refered to in this mysterious game 1. Dominance that clearly never existed.

In short you admit to the Bills not being dominating in game 1. Sounds like my exact point.

I hope if you do make it, you can knock off the Yanks. As a Sox fan, I think we can take the A's. Unless the pitching gets back to form. I the Minnesota can knock off the yanks. Santana and Radke for three games is tough to beat. That Minnesota pen worries me tho, Yanks seem to hit them well.

I gotta ask. From an A's fan perspective, who do you NOT want to play in the playoffs (you should take 2-3 from Ana)? (sorry if you answered this above)

Hey sparky. You gonna talk football, or just blab on to anyone who will listen?

Actually its called language evolution. It happens. Call it butchering, laziness, whatever - we all do it. Many people have no clue they are though.

good, then you better expect more bills bashers here with that attitude.

They dominated? In what sense? The D played well, the offense was pathetic. A team who dominates the game should give some indication of doing so. Henry didn't get near 100 yards (team only had 95 total rushing yards, 242 total *choke*), and you scored 10 points! The only think I saw that was dominating, was the Jax defense. Maybe you meant the Bills defense, but they folded like a lawn chair after Oct 1st on that last drive. So you see why I think he meant game 1 of last year - ya know a game in which the Bills actually DID dominate someone! As far as your comment: yeah you are right thats not negative at all. its being very friendly, along with some nice helpful suggestions.

I came here for a good discussion about the game. Some Bills fans are here for good discussion, others can't stand Pats fans being here and go out of their way to try to get us banned. Give me a break. There is another word for that - TROLLING. You want to discuss the game. fine. lets do it. Otherwise keep your "lets bash the pats fan we dont want him here" isolationist comments to yourself.

So your first comment doesn't count huh? Ya know, the one that STARTED it all? I see nothing here about a running game do you? I guess you just made that up. If you want the Bills to do the "same thing they did in week 1" - which is lose. Ok then, you are right. =)

The word was included in the last edition of Websters.

<--- No myopia with this sig. Some Bills fans wonder why some Pats fan's troll. Try not being an ass. Keep rude comments to oneself and maybe there wont be problems.

If you say so. Sounds like he was refering to week 1 of LAST year. But clearly its not specified. Irregardless, maybe you should consider that and stand down your nuclear missles the next time someone makes a post. JMHO.

The original poster made reference to 2003 game 1. Reading is fundamental.

Well you are looking at 10-6 for wild card. so 10-3 the rest of the way? It's possible....

OK A few things form a Pats fan: Law has looked fine. He kept Harrison down most of the day. Horrendous? The guy had one veyr bad game - the SUper Bowl. How can the best D in the league, a team that allowed the fewest points in the league have a horrendous second corner? Besides you might see more of Asinte Samuel, who is a rising star. Wire will see a healthy dose of Daniel Graham. You can bet on that. But I'd expect the 5 wides too. I am not sure I understand this. Pats play a base 3-4, and rely on a 4-3 only when they have a problem stopping the run (see second half of Indy game). The base 3-4 was our primary D all of last year. Linebackers are more athletic then D-Lineman and can cover as well as pressure the QB like any D-lineman. I don't know how you can say this is a weaker personel group, or how it would allow Drew to have more time to throw. I agree here. If the Pats win, they will win by only a FG or a TD.

Every game is a "classic trap game". Isn't a trap game when you play someone who is not as good as you are and they have a chance to win? Pats are the best team right now. We have injuries up the wazoo all of a sudden. One of our best recievers is out, and we lost our rookie tight end of the year. As long as the offense doesn't turn it over, we should be fine. Pats will win by 3. They will probably go to the 5 wides for the first quarter and score quickly to try to take Henry out of the game. Then they can give Dillon another 35 carries.

He ran on 1st and 2nd downs, no? I would have ran him 4 times. 1st and 3 at JAC 3 Travis Henry (BUF) rushed up the middle for 1 yard. 2nd and 2 at JAC 2 Travis Henry (BUF) rushed up the middle for 1 yard. 3rd and 1 at JAC 1 Drew Bledsoe (BUF) sacked for a loss of 6 yards. 4th and 7 at JAC 7 25 yard field goal by Rian Lindell (BUF) is good.

Is it the play calling? Shouldn't the Buffalo O just pound the ball on first and second down and only throw on third and long? With two good backs, there should be no reason to rely on bledsoe's arm. Was the running game not working well? Taking a look at the drive charts on ESPN there were quite a few incomplete passes on first down. Also a couple of passes on third and short. I guess I am not seeing the big picture here.

Watson had a great game. He plowed over vetran saftey Mike Minter (ya know the guy who said that game was SuperBowl part 2), making him look like a rag doll in the process.