Doza

Fleacher would be picked up so fast by Belichick.... BB loves the guy. I dunno why the lot of you hate him so much.

Your credability here is astounding. I wish I could know as much as you.

So much for having any standards on this board. Mods? This is a tad out of line.

Good argument. If they don't agree with you, insult them.

The "analysis" is all around you. He isn't accurate, he can't call plays on his own, and all he seems to be able to do is run with the ball. He should have been a running back.

Vick might be the most overrated player in the league.

Kelly better than Brady? LOL

Nice job guys. That guy is blind. Why don't ya kick the dog while you are at it.

Actually.... This is kinda weird but bear with me. If the Colts WIN this game, they will have to play Buffalo. If the Colts LOSE this game, they will have to play Denver. Now... being an objective fan of football which team would YOU rather play??? Something tells me the Colts won't be "trying" hard to rack up 40 points like they normally do.

Rams won't beat the Jets. They always fall flat against running teams with good defenses.

I gave you three examples and all three are "viable examples". You just choose to ignore them. I bet your ego is loving it. I am done with you. This thread jumped the shark a long time ago. What your doing is a troll (saying things just to elicit a responce), ya know that thing you like to call anyone who disagrees with you.

Key word "lately". It like comparing the defending Super Bowl champs against a team who last won anything nearly (over?) 30 years ago. Eventually ya have to draw a line.

I suspect we will never see you on this board again if you get beaten Sunday. And for the record, what have the Steelers won lately? Talk to me when they have won something.

Yes, keep tell everyone how you are right and I am wrong, and perhaps the whole world will believe... After all you can't be wrong, can you.. naaa not you. But really isn't this whole post all about you and your ego? I have no problem with the way you treat people on this board. Just don't expect your opinions to be taken seriously. They will be treated like the subjective opinions they are.

"Go to your own board, your facts and objective reasonings are not wanted here" Since everyone loves talking about post counts.. how about the 183 count Bills fan calling the 1,000+ posts Pats fan he is a troll, and to get off his board.

Or someone who disagrees with you.

um... education is key:

I gave you several examples, dismissed of course, as the logic clearly go against your argument. Since then not only have other Pats fans come forward, but BILLS fans as well, who think you are wrong. Believe what you want, there is reality, and there is your way. Since myopic thinking is such a common theme on this board, I am not surprised to see that word show up, especially when all hope to winning an argument is lost. When all else fails, you must take it to a personal level, that is the only sure avenue to "winning" an argument on an internet chat board.

Yes, I agree entirely. The Loss to Pittsburgh was a MUCH BIGGER LOSS to the Pats than anything that happened in Miami. Granted no loss is a good thing, but the lesser of two evils is definately Miami.

Jets need a win to get in, no? Another thing, I like how I am labled "troll" even though you fools are the ones attacking MY team. I guess troll is just another word for "Let's call him a funny name to try to invaladate the truth".

Seems like all these other examples have some further meaning to them, like knocking a team from a playoff birth, or knocking a team out of the playoffs. Still waiting to find out what Miami did to the Pats that even comes close, other than putting a blemish on a 13 (hopefully 14) win season.

Playoffs are infinately more meaningful than regular season, thats why. Perhaps if Buffalo didn't have some of their worst colapses when it mattered the most (not when it matters the least, as in the case with New England) you wouldn't be so sour. I see it as a loss during the regular season that had no real impact on the post season (assuming a Pittsburgh win), and I am correct. It was not a game we "had to have". One win out of our last three would have clinched the second seed. The first seed was out of our control. We'd have to win out and hope for a Pittsburgh loss. You go on as if that loss spiraled the Pats into a losing streak of doom. Instead they snap out of it and put a horse whuppin on a key divisional rival (and a good team too). So if anything, the loss has made the Pats a BETTER team because of it.

31-0 was the "Greatest Buffalo Victory in 5 Years". When it happened... Apparently this Miami win is like Buffalo coming back against the Oilers. What a joke. And I find it amusing that their are Buffalo fans who like to think it was anything more than a second regular season loss.

Where did you learn to read? I said it will be meaningless if Pittsburgh wins over Buffalo. Unless you are another Bills fan assuming a Buffalo win. Right now, that loss has no bearing on the playoffs. It's a regular season upset. A bad loss. Not even close to anything that resembled "greatest upset of last 5 years". You want a great upset? How about Pats over Pittsburgh in AFC Championship game 2001? Or maybe Pats of Rams in the SB? How about Carolina over Philly in the NFC Championship game? I could list dozens more, but if you want to go on about this one friggen game go ahead. The Pats have already put it behind them when they spanked the Jets on their homefield. You should too. I bet you still talk about the 31-0 loss.

You are joking right? Miami beats New England one time in the regular season and you morons called it "THE SINGLE MOST EMBARRASSING UPSET OF THE PAST FIVE YEARS". Sounds like something you fans say to yourself to make you feel better. This is a joke. Talk to me come playoff time, when the games REALLY count. You better beat Pittsburgh or as it turns out, that Miami game was meaningless.