meazza

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/03/01/reporter_to_obama_it_sounds_like_you_are_ducking_responsibility.html I'm assuming he's referring to Julie Hyman from Bloomberg.

Just ordered this t-shirt:

What do you mean by "you people"

You're going to regret asking.

You're going to regret that post.

Welcome back

Just in case anyone didn't feel like going back in time:

In a street fight you can't really judge someones reaction since there are too many unknown variables and everything usually happens in less than 30 seconds. In the fights I've been anyway, I wouldn't even recall what happened. That being said, in a situation like that, (assuming GZ feels his life is in danger), i don't blame him for what he did. Should he have followed the guy? Probably not.

Getting punched and getting his ass whooped would essentially fall in the same category. The devil is in proving who initiated the fight. Numerous? And tell me good sir, what is your assertion as to why the rest of the media (and BHO) were willing to give Trayvon the benefit of the doubt? Perhaps we look at the information and come up with our own conclusions (though no matter what I think happens, it won't have any impact on the actual case in contrast to being on the actual jury and having to decide if a man goes to prison or not). Seems like you're ready to call out people who believe one side of the story but not the other.

Have I? Just because I laughed at your interpretation doesn't necessarily mean I fully believe what GZ claims. There will be a jury to decide that. You have proven what exactly?

His nose looks broken from that angle.

Actually if you were to read back on the 74 + pages in this thread, you'll see that I don't really have that much of an opinion because there is obviously much conflicting information as well as obvious biased media with an agenda (see MSNBC). That being said, if Zimmerman followed Trayvon, Trayvon confronted him and instigated the attack, then Zimmerman has a right to defend himself with lethal force. It should be clear that if someone follows me, chances are I would confront him as well and maybe **** would hit the fan but that wouldn't necessarily mean I was correct in the eyes of the law. Because I favor Jewish Mexicans? Ok misunderstanding.

Your opinion that Trayvon is the victim?

My guess is Jauronimo is saying that following someone isn't grounds to get an ass whoopin which means you effectively both agree with each other?

You do? Re-read this sentence:

Ummm... do you know how to read?

Man the **** people will say to justify their opinions.

So you seem to take more from the Chinese side from what I understand?

To be fair, too many of the posters were too stupid to even debate which obviously was a factor in the structure of my responses

Can't... banned

Obviously you're the problem because there is a poster in this thread who has been married for 25 years.

I sometimes venture on a left leaning board and there was this uproar that apple was hoarding 80 Billion in cash and the angry lefties were claiming that apple should be forced to invest all that excess cash into the economy. A thread below that was a discussion about how companies were irresponsible for not having enough cash on their balance sheets to prevent the financial crisis :lol:

It's a joke bud.

http://www.universetoday.com/100339/tito-wants-to-send-married-couple-on-mars-flyby-mission/ One things for sure, they will not be a married couple when they come back.