Jump to content

Snappysnackcakes

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    210

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Snappysnackcakes

    Officially the Offseason: Tyreek Hill Assaults another woman

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    He’s a piece of garbage. But the NFL loves the little SOB because he’s a walking highlight reel. Screw the Dolphins for keeping such a POS on their squad. 

    1 hour ago, DapperCam said:

     

    I've never broken a woman's leg. Why is Hill frequently in scenarios like this? He's not a good person.

    Because he’s a scumbag. He ain’t normal at all. He’s a damned thug. A freaking knuckle dragging troglodyte. Screw the ‘phins. 

    Mahomes dad arrested for DWI

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    1 hour ago, K-9 said:

    At least his third charge of DWI? That qualifies as a menace, but Texas doesn’t give a flying !@#$.

    I’d say his spending weekends in jail for his previous conviction proves otherwise. As a Texan, I’d ask you to reconsider your generalizations. 

    • Like (+1) 3

    Core concepts of Joe Brady's offense

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    4 hours ago, hondo in seattle said:

     

    You might be right but let me make some observations before asking you something.  

     

    There are two basic offensive systems in the NFL: Erhardt-Perkins and West Coast.  I've heard coaches and players say all NFL teams run, more-or-less, the same plays.  So there are two basic playbooks: E-P and West Coast.  And there's a lot of overlap between the two. 

     

    Coordinators tweak and combine ideas as they feel appropriate to create their own syncretic scheme.  But no coordinator is filling a playbook with plays no one has seen before based on an offensive strategy no one has considered before.    

     

    When Kurt Warner, for example, diagnoses Bills film, he knows & understands the play he's reviewing because he ran the same play (or one very similar) when he played.  He knows what it's designed to do and how it's supposed to be executed.  

     

    So what is Brady's real offense?  What is he going to do schematically different next year that he couldn't do this year?  What plays will he use that weren't in this year's playbook?  

     

    You understand professional football. Great post. It’s all about exploiting mismatches, usually ones that are created by an effective coach. It sounds too simple, yes, but it really boils down to this. I liken it to British Fighting Squares when it’s boiled down to its simplest form. Basically, win your matchup when able or consolidate onto the next opponent. This concept is especially important when you judge an offensive line as a unit. 

    • Like (+1) 2

    Random talking head says something about the Bills

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    I’m not gonna post a link, because I don’t want that smarmy SOB to get clicks, but he believes the offensive Offside shouldn’t have been called. This is from a freaking lawyer! Pattie Cakes is upset because he thinks that flags shouldn’t affect the outcomes of games. Well, which cave has that moron been living in, since his career began? Unfreakingreal. 

    • Angry 1

    Second blitz at end of game

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    57 minutes ago, HoofHearted said:

    There’s the disconnect. This isn’t about McDermott to me. I’ve been solely speaking about the call itself. To be clear - it was not the identical call as the play before. Also, I’ve never said it was the only call that should be made there. I just want us (as a board) to get out of this mindset of “if a play doesn’t work it was a bad call” mentality. Or at the very least be able to back up why it was a bad call from a schematic/situational standpoint.

     

    And to be very clear Russ threw up a prayer - all you guys saying the rainbow was intentional to draw a flag are hilarious.

    Well holy smokes, we agree. As I just said, no play is designed to fail. You can execute a play perfectly and still “lose” that down. First blitz was a win. Second was a loss. The second blitz effectively allowed the Broncs to “try again” and I believe the “rainbow” was by design because it is more difficult to time a catch (offensively and defensively) which favors the offense. Think of it as a quasi Hail Mary except, most importantly, a DPI has to be called if it occurs.


    I stand by my believing Coach has finished evolving and needs to be replaced. No good comes from this organization doing a midseason change and he’s done more than enough to earn a full, final season. And to all who think this unit can rally and save the season, I sure hope so, but Allen looks nothing like himself and Coach has run out of people to blame. If he’s given another HC job, he needs to study his mentor Reid and Belichick. The buck stops with them. 

    Second blitz at end of game

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    7 hours ago, HoofHearted said:

    I’m simply asking you to back up your OP, but instead you’ve just floundered around and become defensive.

    And if we sat back in zone they probably would have. By blitzing we forced them into making a low percentage throw. It didn’t work in our favor. Doesn’t make it a bad call though.

    No play, by design, is called to fail. As an example, a FB dive is not designed to result in an 80 yard TD, but getting even 4 yards is a successful design and likely solid execution. In this case, by calling, essentially, consecutive identical blitzes, and leaving TJ alone in coverage, we gave Denver a do over and we got burned. It cannot be this difficult to understand the coach telling his QB, “If they try this again, then do this” which is EXACTLY what transpired. And I stand by my post in strongly believing Coach has reached his ceiling in this league. For this call, 12 men, and a slew of other reasons. It’s not an attack on the man, it’s just an obvious reality - at least to me and 3/5 of Wallers. Nobody has to agree with me, and clearly you do not. All I can picture is Pee-Wee Herman repeating “I know you are but what am I?” after someone calls him a name. That’s literally how you’ve treated this thread, with the redundant responses. 

    • Like (+1) 1

    Second blitz at end of game

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    LOL. Dude, what is going on in your head? You obviously understand traits and tendencies, based on a few responses in this thread. Calling two almost full-house blitzes in a row is not wise. I’m not gonna argue this stuff any longer - you win! Just like “Big Brain Sean” won the game last night…because if it had been an incompletion, an incompletion with one nickel back in coverage, because did I mention the whole almost full- house blitz two plays in a row thing would’ve been universally recognized by the football talking heads as “ brilliant playcalling…?” So, you go ahead and live in your world and I’ll reside in football reality. Deal? 

    Second blitz at end of game

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    This ain’t a video game. It’s called strategy, muscle memory, tendencies, familiarity, and, most importantly- EXPERIENCE! Sean was outsmarted by a cagey vet and one of the best HC’s of our generation. If you cannot see this as, at minimum, a possibility, I can’t help you. In short, we gave them a mulligan and ate a big dic* at the end ofthe game. 

    Second blitz at end of game

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    Just now, HoofHearted said:

    They aren’t rhetorical. I genuinely wanted an answer, and the answer I got was basically “hindsight is 20/20”. Just because the outcome wasn’t what we wanted doesn't make it a bad call.

    This ain’t a video game. It’s called strategy, muscle memory, tendencies, familiarity, and, most importantly- EXPERIENCE! Sean was outsmarted by a cagey vet and one of the best HC’s of our generation. If you cannot see this as, at minimum, a possibility, I can’t help you. In short, we gave them a mulligan and ate a big dic* at the end of the game. 

    • Like (+1) 1

    Second blitz at end of game

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    Just now, HoofHearted said:

    What makes it a terrible call?

    How about the results? Dude, really? Is this McDermott? Was trying to be succinct, but this staff has the franchise on a collision course to immediate mediocrity. Daboll at the end of the Giants/Bills game? Sean’s created a toxic culture and it was on full display after the whistle blew. Had they squirreled out a W last night, which one of us would still, with confidence, profess that all is right in the world? Lest you not forget, Any Reid fired Sean in Philly, too. I’m flawed, you’re flawed, and, clearly Sean’s taken this QB and team as far as he can. So

    stop trolling with the nonsense, rhetorical questions, please. 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 5

    Second blitz at end of game

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    I wholeheartedly agree that Sean needs to be replaced and the second blitz in a row, at the end of the game, seals it for me. This was a legitimately terrible defensive play call. Period. Sean is the DC. End of story. He, unlike previous seasons, has no one to blame. It’s on him and he was outsmarted by a very talented coach and very experienced QB. This is a microcosm of Sean’s time as HC. I wish to be succinct, so that’s it. 

    • Like (+1) 4
    • Vomit 1
    • Eyeroll 2
    • Disagree 2
    • Agree 10
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...