Frat-Train

The irony of this thread (and forum) is nobody is in true disagreement of how awful socialism and communism are. There’s just 2-3 posters (and their many sub accounts) that spend day in and out pretending they welcome it, just to get a rise out of people.

98% approval rating coming out of CPAC. This is a reality, unfortunately.

Castro was a part of the Cuban revolution and was a key to the overthrow of Batista…. He then became Prime Minister and took the country to socialism (schooling and healthcare) before aligning with the Soviets under communism. Afterwards, he focused on Chile, Nicaragua and Granada where the socialist ideas were spread under his influence (save for Soviet Union). It’s literally the socialist playbook. Come to power, divide the country, increase power through division, destroy dissent and most importantly…. Do everything not to lose power, by any means. I know you think what you say is funny, but as someone who speaks with a jovial authority, you should have much more historical understanding to back up your understanding of it. What’s happening is textbook and I say this having voted for President Biden. Im at a complete loss at what I’m seeing, as are most Americans that have chosen to turn off the news and find facts beyond what Facebook tells them.

(4). Adorable. I’m not the one with multiple accounts, resorting to tantrum-style name calling when called out about propaganda spreading. Look at you go!

I’m not the one with multiple accounts, resorting to tantrum-style name calling when called out about propaganda spreading Also… Frat wannabe is a fraud. Just watch how quickly his holier than thou attitude turns into a tantrum. On brand for these pigs. Just watch. - Your words about me. And yet you described yourself beautifully. Back to the ignore with you, little buddy.

I’m not the one with multiple accounts, resorting to tantrum-style name calling when called out about propaganda spreading and (4). Man them ip addresses, amiright? Thanks for all you do!

I’m not the one with multiple accounts, resorting to tantrum-style name calling when called out about propaganda spreading.

(4)

I’m not the one with multiple accounts, resorting to tantrum-style name calling when called out about propaganda spreading. My response from earlier…. (Actually the 3rd time I said it, too.) My intentions are easy to conclude. They’re the same as those who are trending; Why that wording was and is used. Again, you don’t have a problem with it. No need to take our conversation any further. We can each separately focus on our perspective of how I’m (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) bothered by our media’s phrasing and how you don’t see an issue on the header, based on the contents of the article.

My response from earlier…. (Actually the 2nd time I said it, too.) My intentions are easy to conclude. They’re the same as those who are trending; Why that wording was and is used. Again, you don’t have a problem with it. No need to take our conversation any further. We can each separately focus on our perspective of how I’m (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) bothered by our media’s phrasing and how you don’t see an issue on the header, based on the contents of the article.

Your first point… ”it’s in Cuba, moron”, hasn’t aged well against the point you’re trying to latch on to now. Ignore the voices of others at all costs, when it doesn’t align to your thinking. Now I know why you hated any words against the Cuban government.

Not only did I read it, I rechecked Twitter and the same concerns that were shared here (and refuted by you) are now trending on Twitter. My intentions are easy to conclude. They’re the same as those who are trending; Why that wording was and is used. Again, you don’t have a problem with it. No need to take our conversation any further. We can each separately focus on our perspective of how I’m (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) bothered by our media’s phrasing and how you don’t see an issue on the header, based on the contents of the article.

(4)

Said: You’ve made your choice. No need to be a part of the “concern” convo. Reply: This is an amusing little gaming you're playing with yourself. Proof of your intentions and what I suggested earlier. You know…. A few days ago about you guys. Thanks for all you do! 😉

Again, start over from the point where the tweets were posted and review how it’s referred to by two media sources. That’s the issue. Not your interpretation of the semantics of words. It grossly oversimplified, intentionally and maliciously, no matter how you navigate and reason with the “why”. You’ve chosen to just accept it. You’ve made your choice. So no need to be a part of a conversation where others share there concerns for what you’ve admitted doesn’t concern you, right?

I’m doing loops around your reasoning. Nothing more.

Wow…. Stupidity is the main attraction at this zoo. Noted.

William Wallace screamed freedom in the face of oppression. No Scottish person believed the English when they later referred to it as “an anti-government display”. Cmon far left. Actual fascists are out there….

Same as when the Jews shouted freedom to the Nazis, right? Or when Taiwan shouts freedom to China? Ignorance is truly bliss. But let’s be real…. You’re not here to be politically accurate. You’re here because you have hatred to give to those who don’t agree with you. BTW, Not a fan of Cruz, considering I’m a Democrat. I’m proof that moderates are the last line of defense before the far left (you) allows the country to be destroyed. Context is reading the same rhetoric in all left-leaning headlines, referring to a challenge to an oppressive communist government, simply as “Anti-government “. It’s the same way they refer to what’s happening in Asia. But yea, ignorance is bliss and you should continue to focus on the semantics.

There may not be a more honest, clear and transparent example of this thread’s header then the post you just completely bypassed, so you can insult someone. But you’re not really here for truth, 716. Just to practice the sacred art of douchery. Back to the thread: This representation by the NYT is a gross misuse of words that should concern citizens. When we have an American News Source refer to the desperately screamed term “freedom “ in an oppressed country like Cuba, as simply “anti-government “, we have a real problem. When actual “morons” gloss over it because the same media is the well they proudly sip from…. Dark days ahead.

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options

You are. (4.)

Please highlight who “we” are, Sybil…

I’ve mentioned you do, that’s correct. And again, this board has terms of use, which your suggesting I violate just to prove what this board already knows. I don’t know what the “Ann” reference is, but I’m sure you can provide a biased link, that when once debunked, will result once more in your pulling your diaper off in a defiant protest, against a non-sitting President. (4). That’s right. “Please highlight who “we” are, Sybil…”

I think this board is altogether aware of what I’ve shared, considering my being newer to this side. So no need to violate the terms of use on this website by calling out what everyone already knows and knows how to find. As someone who’s leveraged a Mod’s name, you should be much more familiar with the terms of use for twobillsdrive.