
PoundingDog
Community Member-
Posts
520 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About PoundingDog
- Currently Viewing Forum: The Stadium Wall
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
PoundingDog's Achievements

RFA (5/8)
525
Reputation
-
24 hours to cut down time and 5 days after White injury, not a hint of severity on his injury. None of his teammates, agent, family member (especially kids) said anything and no neighbors saw him walk or on clutches. I guess we are not NYC where 100 people would park outside of his drive, fly a drone of some sort to get some news.
-
Competitive advantage! You don't want Tampa to know if Tre is playing or not tomorrow.
-
Maybe Josh and Hailee should've asked Terry to use the boat for their rendezvous in Mexico so that no Paparazzi will be near them. Maybe they did now because there is not much news about them any more.
-
Better now than the 3rd play of the Ravens game.
-
If you are cutting Hamlin, do it now...
PoundingDog replied to Ethan in Cleveland's topic in The Stadium Wall
Mmm watch this video. Cole, as long as he has no setback from injury between now and Sept 7, is going to start. I listened to Babich's interview and what they said is true. Babich said safeties need to be able to play in space and this is the biggest weakness of Hamlin. Can Bishop play in space? We don't know. But we know he has speed to do it. The Bills are going to roll the dice on this one because the stats Dan quoted is true: the Bills disguise since Poyer and Hyde has dropped from the top to the bottom of the league due to our safeties physical traits. -
2nd Window for Superbowl Taking Shape
PoundingDog replied to PoundingDog's topic in The Stadium Wall
In a broader sense, having a QB like Allen means you have a chance, not what I call or a window. I said earlier, there are other teams with a QB as capable as Allen to have a chance to win it all. I interpret the "window" term to mean a team loading up assets for a push to win it all; it won't let go any assets even though it probably mean better for the team in the long run or effectively "renting a player" (baseball term) for the short term purpose. In Bills case, signing Von Miller to a 6 years 100+ million deal, even at the expected 3 years effective life span of the contract for a 33 year old guy, is not something a team not believing it is about to win it all would do. Conversely jettering Diggs for a 2nd round pick, even though we had no one better than Diggs on the team at the time, is something we believed we were NOT in the window while the Texans believed that they were in the window. There are exceptions, of course, and plenty of them. Brady's 1st superbowl. Chiefs superbowl after trading away Hill etc. Last year Allen's unexpected step forward got us to the door step of a superbowl. The Bills extending all these players this off-season means they believe these guys are good enough to help Allen to get to the superbowl within those extension years, thus the window. -
2nd Window for Superbowl Taking Shape
PoundingDog replied to PoundingDog's topic in The Stadium Wall
Come on now. We are now way past the drought years when we had no chance because of qb issue. We are now talking about windows among elite teams which have qbs who can lead the respective teams to a Super Bowl. Yes Allen is elite. But when he is facing another team in the playoffs that also has an elite qb, then it matters who has more and better core supporting casts. -
When Josh broke out 2020 season, the 1st window for superbowl opened. OBD went ahead added Von to their core players of Allen, Diggs, Knox, Dawkins, Morse, Oliver, Milano, White, Hyde, and Poyer. 3 seasons, 21-23, some bad luck like injuries, inexperience, and aging of a lot of the core guy proved to be not quite good enough. 2024 was supposed to be a reset and reloading year. Almost all of the aging core guys were let go. But Allen took a step ahead into an MVP. As such OBD is setting up the 2nd window for superbowl, identifying and signing up the new core guys. Allen, Oliver, Dawkins, Knox remained; Bernard, Brown, Shakir, Rousseau, Benford and now Cook are given extension to be the new core guys. They really need a few more to step up like Kincaid and Coleman, plus a few defensive side rookies to pan out in the next 3 years, starting from the 2025 campaign. NFL windows are short. 3 years from now, if they don’t get it, a number of these core guys will be out of the door and a new reset is in the order to clear the book. Let’s hope from the coaching stuff to the core guys left from the first window got hardened enough to gives us better results in January.
- 63 replies
-
- 17
-
-
-
-
-
McDermott strikes me as one of the conservative, somewhat old fashioned coaches. He is not McVay type. He has progressed the last 8 years but you know he probably holds "no practice no play" type of philosophy to heart. Since the Bills never had a hold-out player in practice when McDermott as a HC, just like putting yourself in his position, I'd certain make my stance clear to Mr. Cook in terms of my standard for on field performance related practice habits. Note this is just one side of the job as HC in terms of managing players. There is another side of the job in terms of working with Beane on determining players like who are core, who are base, etc. which I think they have already worked out in the off-season
-
Well, Sal speaks more of my feel about Cook in this saga. Cook is likely torn between wanting to be a good teamate and getting his money following the advice of his brother and agent. Probably the reason for this unusual "hold-in" stance a week into the training camp, and back to practice today after a heart-to-heart talk with McDermott who probably explained the practice/on-field side of things for his overall own good (leading to more financial leverage). I don't know a contract is forthcoming, and that looks to be a consistent sentiment from all those covered the Bills today at practice. Many of them said they have no idea if Cook is sure to even practise tomorrow, though I would think it would create much worse problem for the coaching staff and fellow players if Cook decides to do that. Coaches and players all have practice plan, like who is in which personnel grouping and plays a specific role in each play; no one likes to have unexpected changes showing up at work.
-
Maybe there is a deal. But ... the reporters asked Cook to speak after the practice and he declined. If a deal is done, I'd think Cook is likely to speak something - it is not like he has to pass a physical, that kind of hurdles. People skills are important, for a HC and GM, even in such a ruthless business where everything is driven by bottom line (win, loss, are you better than the next guy?). Cook and his presentative went the route of "Hold in", if they are smart, they should have an exit plan, with or without a deal. Likewise, Beane and McDermott should have possible paths planned and try to steer it clear of a "dead-end." Best path is a deal both party are comfortable. Short of that, you need to find a respected way for Cook to go, not feeling humiliated - I do not believe Cook is some very stubborn head being unrealistic. Cook has made over $4 million dollars on his rookie contract so far and his 2025 proven performance escalator is bumping his 2025 base salary to over $5.2 million. So we know he's not going to mess up with that money. But he is going to be 26 near the end of sept. So he is looking for his biggest payday the next contract. At this point, it looks more like the guaranteed money in the next contract will be in the $15 - 20 million range. In contrast, the 2025 franchise tag is about $13.5 million (expect 2026 to be up more). So really, however, you look at it, if Beane is offering par market rate, the 2 sides will be "close" by NFL contract standards. The fact they have not come to an agreement so far leads me to believe either Beane wants a "home discount" or Cook's side believe there are "white knight teams" out there willing to over pay, or even worse both of those are true.
-
Why wouldn't that be leaked (vs extension)? That should be a victory for the agent right?