FLFan
-
Posts
4,809 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by FLFan
-
-
I've already said my piece on Sanchez, and I don't care to reiterate. Like I said before, we can disagree....plain and simple.
Now Geno is, what...22 or 23? Far to young for anyone to be making declarations on his ability to mature. I agree that the media has done its best to make him look like a Turd, but that's it at this point.
Geno Smith does not the media to make him look bad. He does that all by himself. No media conspiracy necessary.
-
Here we go again. Another dismal rebuilding season. All the optimism of the offseason is over. Prepare to have your heart broken and many sad Monday mornings Bills fans.
You are quite the ray of sunshine. I prefer to bask in the glory of everlasting early season hope, thanks very much.
-
This is off the current discussion thread a little, so sorry about that, but I find it interesting that the Toronto Sun has a story quoting Byrd as squelching the trade desire rumors, while the Buffalo media braintrust has nothing to say about that. Just interesting is all. Carry on.
-
I happened to catch him on NFL Network yesterday. His profile seems to be rising but I cannot figure out why. He had absolutely nothing remotely insightful to say. Arrogant twit.
-
My position here is that the Franchise Tag is part of the equation, whether players like it or not. It is not as if Byrd did not have any choice in this matter. He did. He could have chosen to accept what ever offer the bills made, in which case he would have received his signing bonus and long term deal. Or he could have chosen not to. Byrd chose not to accept the offer. He also knew at the time of his decision, it would mean signing and playing under the one year tag or sitting out the season - or until he got traded. He then chose to sign and play for one year. There is no blame on either side because we do not know the details of the negotiations - and I have no ill will against him for making the decisions he made. However, once he made the decision to sign and play, he should have reported in time to learn the new system, get into playing shape, and be ready to play the opening game. I have no idea how serious his foot condition is. What I do see, is someone who wanted to take a purely business approach (which is his right) and then feel like it is personal when the organization does the same thing (which is their right). In the end, I see a player that has not been there for his teammates...and that is something I do have a problem with.
Exactly how I feel.
As for the "news" that Parker is trying to orchestrate a trade, what exactly did anyone expect? This is his MO, and since it has worked with the Bills before, he is trying it again. This is more of a media story, and paranoia of the fans, than anything else right now, I think. I expect that when the bullets start flying Byrd will be on the field and playing hard. If not, you would have to seriously question his character, and I do not expect it. We will see.
I have said it in other threads, and I'll say it here.... next up is Alex Carrington, Parker's other client currently on our roster, time to bench him now and cut your losses while he has yet to develop into a good player. Let someone else grow into our system.
I did not realize that. Too bad. Good as gone, now that he finally seems to be ready to play to his potential.
-
I'm in this camp, and since it isn't my money I'd franchise him again next offseason whether he contributes or not. That might seem to be a stupid business move, but, until the FO shows that they are willing to use every word in the CBA to their advantage they'll be walked on again and again.
I agree. This is happening because Parker got the Bills to buckle with Peters employing the same tactics. The Bills also buckled with Clements, agreeing not to franchise him the following year.
-
this
No question. I am not worried about the offense - all about the defense keeping it close.
-
I really can't believe we didn't address the other CB spot opposite Gilmore in the offseason. Now we are in a real mess now that Gilmore is out. Brady is going to pick these guys apart. Nothing frustrates me more than seeing Brooks or McKelvin 10 yards off their man and then watching them do a little curl or out and picking up 7-8 yards every play. These guys need to get physical this week imo
They did address the other corner in the offseason - they resigned McKelvin - who actually looked pretty good toward the end of last year when he got back in the DB line up. It hurts having Gilmore out no doubt, but I do not expect Pettine to adjust his style and plays the CB's "10 yards off". They will be pressing and physical. Brooks can hit and is faster than any of the Patriots receivers. The key will be covering Amendola - besides that they have no one to be afraid of. Lets see how Danny Boy does after getting rocked a few times. I am quite sure the game plan will be to hit their receivers often and hard. No comparison to any of the previous defensive coaches we have had.
-
well, its possible it didnt show up. its also possible he didnt truly show 100% health but was an injury risk they were willing to accept in the signing. when the alternative to signing him was releasing him, id rather hold his rights at this point, wouldnt you?
It is my understanding that this problem can only be diagnosed via the symptoms reported. That is why this is an awfully convenient injury to have if your intent is not to play. I guess we will see, but I tend to think it will be fine by the end of December.
-
Yes but it's BADOLBEELZ's (the all-caps name says it all) "informed opinion" that the Skins "kept him" and thus it was a great move. LOL!
The Skins had no choice. They were/are in salary cap jail because of the punishment for abusing the system during the strike year. They had no money to sign anyone of any serious note so keeping their mostly washed up players was the best they could do.
-
Is this the year you finally contribute substantively to a football discussion? Nah...
Seriously have you ever actually watched a game? I picture you standing with your back to the field, watching the crowd like a hawk for any sign of a non-believer.
You know, the average poster would get banned for this type of crap. You get a pass I am sure because you have 6,000 plus posts. Does not make you right.
-
If they go and cut Hopkins now - that'll be two years in a row where they've wasted draft picks on kickers, only to release them. This team needs every draft pick it can get. They are such a Micky Mouse organization.
Perhaps we can wait to find out what is really going on before we declare them a Micky mouse organization.
-
I am sure the pats receivers are feeling pretty good against leodis mckelvin and co.
The current Pats receivers are lucky to be playing in the NFL. If anyone other than Brady were the QB, you could could completely ignore the Patriots passing game at this point.
-
IMO, last season Wilson had a bad year. Pretty much everyone on the team had a bad year with the exception of Byrd, and with Mario, Kyle, Gilmore having stretches of good play. Two years ago, Wilson was very, very good until he got hurt, and far better than Leonhard ever played in his life. Wilson is a significantly better player at this point in his career, if only evidenced by the last couple contracts each of the players has received.
I agree Wilson had a great year two years ago. He clearlly hit a wall last year and in my opinion, is done. Arguing which player between Leonard and Wilson is more done, is kind of pointless. I think this is a good depth, short term solution, and Leonard will add Some energy if not great talent. As for Wilson, glad he is gone.
-
Forgive me if that doesn't breed the utmost confidence in the guy. Two awful seasons at corner, getting picked on whenever he steps on the field, and his first year starting at a position he has never played? That's not exactly promising.
But trust me, if he's good, I'd love it. I'm just not ready for the, "he won the starting job he must be a fantastic player!"
Your memory fails you. In his rookie season, he hardly played for he first half and was worked in later in the year due to injuries. He actually looked good in his limited opportunities creating much optimism. He obviously struggled last year, but let's not overdo the hyperbole. Most draft observers had him slotted at safety coming out of college. If you can point to some specific failure in that role during the Pre- season speak up.
-
Why Streeter ??? With what we had this year for WR's , you mean Kaughfman , Rogers weren't worth bringing back to the practice squad ??
I suspect Rogers is someone they viewed with potential but would take a long time to mature, if ever. As for Kaufman, Streeter is the same height, a little bit bulkier build, and much faster. Ran a 4.4. Speed is what Marrone and Hacket are all about.
-
in all fairness. Wood has had injury issues over his time being here. Not saying he's injury prone, but with more than his share of season ending injuries you've really gotta wonder how many looks he'd get for big money.
With that being said, I happen to agree with you on this one and can't help but wonder if the Bills were working with Wood so generously just to spite Byrd and Parker and show them how it's supposed to be done.
Good point on Wood. Also have to think the risk to wait would be weighed heavily by him. None the less, it does take two to make a deal which is my primary point. The player needs to be motivated to want to get a deal done. I do not believe in the take it or leave school of negotiating. Bad for business in the long term.
-
Great example of how it should be done. Both sides negotiating over time to get the deal done. This plainly points up the difference between this and both the Levitre and Byrd situations where the players intended to hit FA no matter what.
-
Wow. Just Shocked... Kaufmann, AND Dickerson? What in the hell are we going to score with? TJ Graham?
-IMPOSSIBLE. The guy simply cannot catch. And CREZ BUTLER??? Why the f___ would you cut that guy Doug? WTF did he do beside out-perform every CB currently on our roster?These cuts remove easily half of the scoring potential from this team? -Something that will hurt like hell down the line.
I don't see Kaufmann clearing waivers at all. He's probably already been picked up by the Patsies! How can you NOT see the talent in that kid???
Talk to us doug... You've lost me on this one.
Seriously? If Kaufman and Dickerson are your only scoring threats you are in trouble anyway. Thankfully, that is not the case.
-
I had not seen this - apologize if posted elsewhere. The Bills/Lions game will be shown on NFLN at 7:00 AM Saturday for those interested.
-
So in other words, we'll have to see for ourselves on Thursday night.
Hey, they might get to that question after they are done badgering anyone who will listen about Jairus Byrd's impending trade and enormous dissatisfaction with the Bills, along with his plan to mail in the season so as not to get injured..
-
He has an ego made of porcelain, couldn't take the heat, acted like a child, conducting himself in a highly unprofessional way, took his ball, scolded everyone, told everyone what a hot shot he was, cried some more, basically said '!@#$ you I don't want to be here anyway,' then went home.
Thats how I remember it. There were some people who went overboard in making it personal, but most agreed at the time he was acting like a petulant child. Good riddance. I do not think much of his reporting since then. Opinions without facts, axe grinding, and egocentric.
-
My guess is Tuel keeps starting as long at the Bills are winning. Go with the hot hand, etc.
That is not what Marrone said today. He said when EJ is ready, he will be the QB, and they are still hoping that will be NE. They will not really know until they see where he is next week.
Haven't had time to read an etire article, only hightlihgts....doesn't Marrone say that they are preparing to start Tuel in week 1? That is slightly different than saying Tuel is going to be the starter on week 1. Tuel is the #1 guy, right now, week 4 of preseason, but that could change next week, if EJ is ready.
Exactly what he said.
-
Right on queue.
How about this for a search exercise? Provide the proportion of posts where Promo offers analysis, insight of the team's play vs the snarky reply to another poster who has the temerity to question the front office's decisions. This should be fun.
I know that it's a lot easier to slam the posters than to address the issue that the front office left no room for error this offseason.
You don't need a link to know that there were three major concerns with the roster as it changed from last year to this - QB, secondary & interior line play. In each of those, Bills chose to go with a very risky strategy of hoping that the guys who either never played in the NFL or never had success in the NFL be their primary and back up options. Through the first three weeks of preseason it looked like the gamble may pay off. Now that they got injuries to key players in those spots, the strategy has certainly backfired.
I've already laid out where I thought Bills messed up with the QB position. There were plenty of CBs available in free agency that are way better than McKelvin, Brooks & Rogers. Plus, it may have helped to have your best safety in camp because you virtually turned over the entire defensive backfield. No 20/20 hindsight needed for the fundamental incompetence of composing the roster.
Now your turn to explain why it's not a big deal that two QBs picked up on the eve of the season may start or play a large amount of snaps.
While you state that 20/20 hindsight is not needed, that is all you offer. Who were the "plenty of CBs available" that were better. Where was your post on that? Where was your post on the supposedly short sighted QB situation? We should have had our best safety in camp? No kidding. What was your master negotiation strategy here - pay him whatever he wants? To what eventual end? Do not criticize other people for offer no facts when you offer none of your own, just hindsight opinions. Life offers no guarantees - you make judgements based on available facts and limitations and always hope for the best. That does not mean there was not strategy involved, even you do not, in hindsight, agree with it.
Predictions - Bills v. New England*
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Upset of the week.