-
Posts
37,116 -
Joined
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BillStime
-
-
-
Tells you everything you need to know
Inside job for sure, right DR? -
-
-
18 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:
You’re way off your game today Billsy. Everything OK?
i have a cold- 1
-
7 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:
But that's not the same bill and 15 weeks is not a ban. Its in line with what almost every other western nation has in effect.
I don’t care**********
When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time. People know themselves much better than you do. That's why it's important to stop expecting them to be something other than who they are
Maya Angelou
-
8 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:
The video clip above is from February 2021. The twit presents it as something recently proposed after the SCOTUS ruling. That's a lie.
HR 705 was introduced in the House on February 2, 2021. It was referred to a House committee on 3/22/21 and went nowhere. The introduced HR bill did not outlaw abortion.
The Congressional record (https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/705/committees) states:
This bill makes it a crime for a physician to knowingly perform an abortion (1) without determining whether the fetus has a detectable heartbeat, (2) without informing the mother of the results, or (3) after determining that a fetus has a detectable heartbeat.
It provides an exception for an abortion that is necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical (but not psychological or emotional) disorder, illness, or condition.
A physician who performs a prohibited abortion is subject to criminal penalties—a fine, up to five years in prison, or both.
A woman who undergoes a prohibited abortion may not be prosecuted for violating or conspiring to violate the provisions of this bill.
Are you seriously trying to tell us that the cult isn’t trying to pass a nationwide ban on abortion?Preventing women from crossing state lines to get an abortion?
Whats next? Forcing women to take a pregnancy test when going through TSA?
-
Just now, aristocrat said:
Questioning the logic of people is not the equivalent of hate.
Sometimes, that is true.
Not this time.
-
-
4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:
Ok per your direction I looked in the mirror to see someone who doesn’t look like me. While I admit the image is backwards, it does look like me.
Any other hoops you want others to jump through before you admit that it’s YOU that believe that gay people somehow look different from other people? Yikes! You really have to get out more. The world has changed since you held up in your bunker basement, or prison cell.
No I'm good . I'm glad you narrowed in on what you hate most - GAYS - and not women nor POC.
-
-
-
6 minutes ago, billsfan5121 said:
Also wanted to add that it’s hilarious that you mention my hate for people who don’t look like me when I clearly stated I don’t hate. But this, coming from someone who admitted to hating people for reasons he felt were justifiable - ones that imply hating people who don’t look like you.
You really do embody what one of the great thinkers of our generation once stated:
”every accusation is a confession” - Billstime
Thank you. I appreciate the compliment.
Anything else?
-
👆🤡 The cult is worried
Trump is too!
Only reason why DR is pumping these pathetic threads. -
Just now, billsfan5121 said:
You don’t read. I said a Christian does not have hate, or they should really start assessing their own walk of faith
Oh ok -
-
58 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:
Let’s try this again…but slower…you said that a poster hated anyone who didn’t look like him. Seems a bit stereotypical for you to assume gay people somehow look different from other people. So…..Please explain to the rest of us what you believe gay people look like.
We’ll wait.
look in the mirror and report back -
-
12 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:
Please explain to us all what gay people look like. This, I’m dying to read.
Look in the mirror?
Most outspoken bigots have something to hide. -
-
19 minutes ago, billsfan5121 said:That didn’t answer the question at all. Because what you just said is you can justify why it’s ok to hate people you don’t agree with, but it’s wrong for others?
So really, you just admitted that you hate others for their views. Can’t take that back now. So now, without being hypocritical, how can you have any issues if other people are the same?
Whats even funnier is that you lump conservatives with Christians yet know nothing about Christianity. Just because someone says “yeah, I’m a Christian” doesn’t necessarily make them a Christian.
A true Christian does NOT have to agree with others lifestyle choices. BUT, harboring hate is the most anti-Christian ideology there is, considering Jesus broke down everything taught into two basic concepts, LOVE God and LOVE others. So a Christian who hates anyone, regardless of their lifestyle, is actually living out the most un-Biblical definition of Christianity.
Anyways, I assume you don’t particularly care about any of that, so I’d like to hear more about it being ok to hate one group and not another.
I don’t have to take anything back. I am comfortable with my perspective.
I don’t care what you do in your private space - go be a conservative - Christian - you name it - have a ball…
But as soon as you freaks start passing laws because you’re so insecure and can’t handle women, POC, LGTBQ and so on - you hide your hate and bigotry behind the Bible or dictionary - you can go f yourself.
Have a great day
-
1 minute ago, billsfan5121 said:
Can I ask a serious question?
What’s the difference between his alleged hate for trans people and your clear hate of conservative people?
Everyone has to live by your rules.
Every single time and issue. -
3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:
I apologize if you took it the wrong way. I’m not calling you stupid. The problem with the way this entire farce of a committee is being handled is that there is only one side to any of this being presented. There isn’t any cross examination, let alone a defense. If every court case was handled this way everyone in America would be in prison! If I give the committee the benefit of the doubt at the very least this should not be playing out in public. Even at your local school board meeting these sort of issues are handled in what is called ‘closed session’.
It didn’t have the be this way… but the cult voted against an independent counsel.I wonder why…
-
Secret Service Deleted Jan 6 Text Messages After Oversight Officials Requested Them
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Disagree.
ETTD