Beck Water

I don't keep up on the stats. For outright winning, could be so - I seem to recall you beating the drum for it pretty heavily some years back. It didn't fit what I was trying to do in looking at QB performance, since it accounts for sacks - which may or may not be under the QB's control. And I believe its creators have played around with the weighting on TDs vs INTs a couple of times? weighting TD more heavily and INT less. But ANY/A ultimately makes the same fundamental point in rebuttal to the post I was responding to - it includes both TDs and INTs (with whatever weighting is being used) - reinforcing the point that any reasonable assessment of QB performance can not just "dismiss the QB's TDs because of the turnovers". They both matter, and if there are "enough" passing TDs (whatever that means) it compensates for "few enough" INTs (whatever that means) - that's my take-home. If you prefer to use ANY/A, Josh is #8 in the league right now. Herbert is #9, Mahomes is #11, Hurts is #12, Lawrence is #15, Burrows is #21.

So people are saying the offensive players were complaining about Canada and it had reached a place where they weren't keeping it 'in house' It's an interesting point that I haven't heard speculation about "behind the scenes" stuff with the Bills....is that in part because McDermott and Beane seem to firmly believe "loose lips sink ships" and seem to do a pretty good job cultivating a culture where players "keep things in house"? But surely there was some...I find it hard to believe that a coach who displayed the emotional control breakdown that Dorsey did up in the booth after the Heat Stroke loss, and that had multiple players talking about "The Holy Spirit comes out of him", didn't have some "in house" stuff going on that came out after some of our close losses.

I mean, like I said, it's not totally fair, since Schaub got that Aaron Rodgers/Pat Mahomes bench-and-learn apprenticeship in Atlanta, while Pickett got thrown into the fire Week 4 of his rookie year. My point was just that a Matt Schaub ceiling is actually a pretty good player. OK, I getcha now. Expressing support, but then dissociating himself. Did McD do anything similar in his pressers close to the Dorsey firing?

I'm sorry, but I just LOL when I read stuff like this. We're watching on television. We see little glimpses of the QB on the sideline and maybe between plays, carefully chosen by the network to create a narrative and drama. And from that you conclude Hurts is the "same guy when losing and when they took the lead" and the Bills all look like their dog just died? Seriously?

Whaddo I know but if you want a heavy set on the Bills right now, bring in a 6th OL Kincaid has stepped up and really improved as a downfield blocker. I don't know what Boras is feeding him, but it's working. But, if you want a traditional heavy set, I don't think either Kincaid or Morris are your guys. Morris is a converted WR who can bock downfield but has struggled to block in-line. I'm not sure Kincaid is ready to "Wally Pipp" Knox. Though, he may be closer than I thought he'd be going into the season....but Kincaid can't block in-line or pass protect, Knox can.

It's not a fair comparison because Schaub spent 3 years on the Atlanta bench before getting a chance to start with Houston. But then he logged several >4000 yd seasons with mid-60s completion % and a couple of pro-bowl appearances back when it meant more. Then of course injuries finished him in his early 30s. Totally under-appreciated QB in his prime, though, IMHO. So far, Pickett hasn't entered the room to look up at Matt Schaub's ceiling.

That was just a total CF of a situation in NE. Miami did something more analogous to what the Steelers are trying in 2021, making TE coach Godsey and RB coach Studesville joint OCs.

Good coaches don't want to 1) feed the press 2) throw their own people under the bus. Wasn't McDermott saying positive things about how he had full confidence in Ken Dorsey like, the day before he fired him?

It's a good question, but I'm not sure changing OCs makes Pickett's decision making better or faster, or improves the pass protection of their OL. I would tend towards "push" OTOH we have seen a change of some sort improve an offense (Fitzpatrick taking over for Trent Edwards at QB when I would have said our OL was pathetic).

That was exactly my first thought - "oh, didn't the Dolphins under Brian Flores try that one year? I don't think it worked." Edit: 2021. They finished 9-8 and Flores was fired.

I don't want to be That Guy who trash talks someone who's out the door. But Dorsey always had a weird affect to me. In his weekly "coordinator pressers", for most of them he had a very fixed posture as though someone had skewered his head neck and torso, rendering them immoveable relative to each other. And, his pupils always seemed very dilated. I just told myself "maybe he's just uncomfortable talking to the press". Also while dilated pupils are linked in the public mind to drugs of possible abuse such as amphetamines and cocaine, I know that many legit prescribed medications for nausea, seizure disorders, Parkinson's, antidepressants etc can cause dilated pupils. So I told myself don't judge, don't assume, probably he builds great rappore and communicates great with the players and it's just the press conferences that are weird. After he was fired, though, it does seem fair to ask was he just the "chosen sacrifice", or, was there something where he had an issue, and/or where he in fact wasn't communicating to the players any more effectively than he communicated to the press?

OK I had to sit back and digest a bit. I have a couple of questions. You mention top 5 run concepts, but then 16 other run concepts (21 total). 1) just to help me contextualize, do you know or can you estimate how frequent the "top 5" are vs the others? 2) again to help me contextualize, any estimate about what success rate the other concepts have, again, aggregate? 3) I think this is an important ask to some here - any different success ratio in the red zone? I think there has been a lot of angst on this board about shotgun run play calls in a 'goal to go' situation. Since the defense is condensed in this situation, it seems to me the success could be affected? I hope these are straightforward asks, I don't mean to be a PITA looking at a massive data endeavor and saying "please Sir can I have some more?" 🥣 Last Q just curious, what video is this which ripped our Inside Zone and Duo? Thanks!

I just watched the Eagles at Chiefs MNF game. Mahomes did not look as though he were having a lot of fun out there tonight.

Then, at the point Josh is at...those people are wrong to dismiss the TDs due to the turnovers. I did a thing some time ago, where I pulled about 18 years of NFL QB data and looked at a number of stats for correlation to winning. I did this because I ultimately wanted to look at success of QB drafted in different rounds, so before I could do that, I had to define success; obviously a QB can play well and still lose if the defense is awful. So I started out looking at winning teams and how their QB played. Trying to keep this out of TL;DR I found that completion percentage, TD/INT ratio, and YPA (taken all 3 together) were correlated with winning, and the correlation got better if I put in a floor ~220 ypg passing (couldn't pin down an exact number). But here's the thing - the values that correlated were pretty mild. Something like >60% completions, TD/INT greater than 1.5, and YPA >6.5. Which I think most here would say "not very good". The point was, the QB had to meet ALL THREE of those criteria (plus the passing yard floor), not just one. If he did, that was good enough for the team to win with a reasonable defense. Where am I going with this? The point is that right now, Josh is rocking a TD/INT ratio of 1.83. Which is, in fact, good enough to win. Are there QB with better? Yes. Whose teams are having successful years? Yes, some - Brock Purdy, Kirk Cousins, Dak Prescott, Tua. Are there QB of successful teams with similar? Also yes - as a matter of fact, Josh is currently sandwiched between Jalen Hurts and Trevor Lawrence for TD/INT ratio. Obviously, we all want the turnovers to decrease. But the TDs do matter, and the ratio of points the QB helps generate passing (TDs) to INTs is important - actually, as far as correlation to winning, more important than looking at TDs alone or INTs alone.

Thank you! There is a massive amount of data underlying this post.

?

*nodding* It's one train of thought to perceive Dorsey as a 'fall guy', a meaningless sacrifice to the team's execution errors and poor play "It's about the Jimmies and Joes, not the X's and O's" but Another train of thought would be, it's on the coaches to communicate effectively and demand focus and execution in practice that will carry through to the game Maybe....Dorsey had some shortcomings in that department? I must have heard Josh Allen say more than a dozen times over Dorsey's tenure words to the effect, "the QB has to see the field the same way as the OC does and be his eyes on the field". Maybe there was something incompatible between Dorsey and Josh, in the process of trying to get Josh to mesh with him like that? Or, thinking back to the Miami heatstroke game last year and Dorsey's outburst in the booth, and Morse talking about how the "Holy Spirit comes out him" and "you don't want to be on the receiving end" - maybe there was something about how Dorsey would communicate to Josh that wasn't working. Don't know, obviously, but when a team is making unforced errors by the bushel, it does seem plausible that coaching (which is a lot about communication) may have something to do with it.

Against the Jets? 29 (38%) My guess would be they'll designate him to return, but not activate him quite yet - not while we're down so many CB and S

If you look closely at the video, our smiley lil' "Golden Retreiver Vibes" rookie TE Kincaid was getting some fists in. Looks like it's on Jets 91, not Sauce though. That's John Franklin-Meyers. He throws Spencer Brown to the ground and Kincaid neatly punches him for it, below the pads and behind the refs back, then lays off when the ref turns. Nice.

I mean, yes, he nicely corrected him, but schooled? Strange usage.

John Wawrow. Sports reporter for Associated Press, one of the news sources that has strict standards for verifying sources still as opposed to other "press" which utilize each other's questionable tweets referencing anonymous folks as a source. Good and balanced reporter, does a nice job pulling together different interviews and sources to craft a story. Developed the habit of 5 minute monologues that assume the answer to the question he finally asks vs. posing concise questions during Covid.

The Jets assistant DL coach used to coach for the Bills.

Sorry, I'm not usually too much into toting around other people's receipts so I don't think about "forgiving". It's also a thing that some here are very binary in their take. You're either a "hater" or an "apologist" or whatever. I can tell you that there were a lot of posts I saw where people were totally over-the-top in their takes that Edmunds was a terrible, horrible, no good very bad player. Well, if that's true, I doubt the Bills woulda picked up his 5th year option nor that he'd be given the 5th highest ILB contract in FA. FO's do make mistakes but overall the market is efficient, and Bears HC Eberflaus does know something abaout D. Note I'm not saying he deserved that contract, or that the Bills should have kept him. And I suppose there were some people who argued that he was an exceptional player, but most of what I can recall as "apologists" seemed more along the lines of "he doesn't suck, he's not a bad player, he actually plays decently" which is not exactly overpraising him.

Actually right now, I think the ones who should be embarrassed are those who wanted to take Beane to the woodshed for his total waste of a 3rd round pick on Terrel Bernard (and Dorian Williams seems to be showing some promise as well - knock wood) Click on the text of the tweet so that a direct link shows in the browser window. Then copy that link and paste it in.

I do believe that's what "What, you want some of this?" means