Chaos
-
Posts
7,526 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Chaos
-
-
8 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:
Yes, I am quite sure. I have the two players confused.
This post does nothing for me but show your ass
Only because I agreed with your premise that Orlando Brown was not great last year. I won't make the mistake of agreeing with you again.
-
22 minutes ago, H2o said:
Sure, let's put Lamar on TV. He and Leodis McKelvin could be the new Joe Buck and Troy Aikman. The new Nance and Romo.
I was thinking Madden and Summerall.
-
1
-
-
On 3/15/2023 at 10:31 PM, John from Riverside said:
Perhaps it’s just me
I didn’t think Orlando Brown looked great last yearKc certainly didn’t want him back
You may have Orlando confused with Spencer Brown, who was tragically awful. But Orlando Brown also was not great last year.
-
9 hours ago, John from Riverside said:
Jesus
This is simply not true
Mitch Morse was excellent whenever he was on the field. Is he a concussion problem yes, but when he plays he’s one of the better centers.
You can hate on PFF. But they are far more reliable the the JFR ratings. So it simply is true. Below average in 2022.
-
15 minutes ago, Warcodered said:
It's nice that Ed Oliver took the baton from Edmunds of TBD whipping boy.
Not whipping boy, just a guy who is using up more cap space than his production so far has warranted.
-
1
-
-
28 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said:
both guys are in their rookie contract.
Both guys have produced, but not to their draft status.
Both guys have a 5 year controllable contract
Jeudy has out performed Oliver. WR is a far more expensive free agent resigning cost. Jeudy has 2 years left. Oliver has 1 year left. what do you mean they have "5 year controllable contract"
-
1
-
-
Just now, BillsFan2313 said:
They might want an improvement at DT? Just a thought. They aren't rebuilding.
ok
-
5 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said:
What do you say TBD?
I would do it in a NY Minute
Why would Denver make this trade? It is the opposite of what they seem to want to do, which is trade out of a 2 year remaining contract for a 5 year rookie contract for a first rounder. Why would they take on Oliver?
-
3
-
8
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, SCBills said:
Which is why we should only sign him, or any RB, for cheap.
If he had burst, we wouldn’t be able to afford him.
I wouldn't want him for vet minimum.
-
22 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said:
He would get signed to a 3 yr / $60 million broadcasting contract in a heartbeat
This seems like lunacy.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:
Dawkins
McGovern
Morse
Seumalo
Shell
THAT would be a good upgrade.
That would be. I really will be shocked if Morse plays more than half a season. And his play was really declining last year. At this point, he is a below average center.
-
2
-
-
37 minutes ago, SCBills said:
-Big Back
-Instinctive / Gets the tough yards
-Good in pass pro
Checks all the boxes
Left out "No Burst"
-
The goal of a number 1 draft pick is to get a five year starter playing under a rookie deal. Not to get a player for two years who will command full market value of a FA after that.
-
1
-
2
-
-
draft Nolan Smith in the first and sign another vet oline men. Old
edge guys that are cheap are cheap for a reason
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, HappyDays said:
In 2018 we weren't in our Super Bowl window. No way we can go into this draft desperate for a MLB. If the board doesn't fall the right way, we're screwed.
maybe it could fall like this though
-
58 minutes ago, Gregg said:
I thought #27 would be OL but now it may MLB.
Chiefs signed LB Drue Tranquill, formerly of the Chargers, to a one-year contract.
Tranquill was a part-time player for the Chargers for three years but stepped into a larger role for the 2022 season. He started all but one game for LA last year and his numbers exploded. He led the Chargers in tackles while totaling five sacks plus 10 TFLs. He also forced a fumble and picked off one pass. Pro Football Focus graded Tranquill as one of the league's best inside linebackers in pass-rush and coverage situations. He should slot into a starting role for Kansas City in 2023.
maybe we will be getting this level of productivity out of one of our former backups this year.-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:
Yea they tried different things to replace Edmunds. But I am not out on them deciding Bernard is an option.
The bar is set pretty low for Bernard.
-
2 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:
Oh, come on guys
Get a grip. Previous poster tried to conclude that bettors like us the same because we are in the top 10. I was just pointing out that is factually wrong. Facts are facts even if they make you sad.
-
19 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:
Yeah, um, he's got 10 first downs and one TD on 3rd down and 1-3 yards this year, behind that OL that isn't great.
Five attempts the year before that, for 42 yards, another TD and three first downs.
This is only meaningful if the context of how many 3 and 1-3 yard situations are given. If Singletary is used in 80% of those situtations and is converting them 100% of the time, he is an incredible stud. If he is used in 10% of the situations and converts 50%, then he is just getting conversions by the element of suprise on occassion. So your statistical support doesn't really allow any conclusions to be reached.
-
1
-
-
14 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:
I think you're a little petty being that its March. It's not like they went from Favorites to out of the top 10.
We could jump to #1 again. Fanduel, Oddshark, Draftkings have is just behind the Chiefs.But yes, I want more help for Allen.
If bettting odds are the proxy of Super Bowl liklihood, we peaked at +125 last season. Meaning our odds are 6x worse now than at peak betting odds love for the Bills last year. If we go to preseason, we have gone from +400 to +850, meaning the betters think our changes are less than half of last season. So quite clearly trending downwards, among betting money.
-
18 minutes ago, purple haze said:
Tanner McKee, from Stanford?
Ehhh, I don’t know about that. I can’t see him going in the first.He is like the next qb off the board after the initial run. If someone like the saints or Seahawks wants him, they might trade up. If Robinson is gone , there does not seem to be other positional players that are so talented teams are going to move up.
Saints are not a good example they would wait until 29. The bills and bengals are not going qb. But if day the Seahawks liked him at 37 and thought the saints liked him at 29. They might trade to move up ahead of the saints
-
4 minutes ago, Tipster19 said:
Reflecting on what happened to the Bills’ players’ contracts and how they were structured. I was of the opinion that Beane was a wizard when it came to contracts but I’m not so sure right now. Knowing what the salary cap has been I’m a bit surprised by how much the checks and balances were a bit out of whack, finding ourselves upside down and over budget by a considerable amount I might add. If I recall correctly there’s been a few players that Beane put on a 1 year contract on and when the time came to re-sign them they had outplayed their contract, hence to re-up them the cost escalated considerably. I’m thinking it would be better to sign players to a contract that consists of multiple years (3 yes?) with funny money built into the backend of it so it would allow the Bills to have an out of it after a year or 2.
I referenced Tremaine Edmunds’ contract in the title of this thread and what I’d like some opinions on is due to Edmunds being so young (19 yrs old) when we drafted him. The Bills built a contract that in hindsight wasn’t going to favor the Bills in the end. Being only 19, getting 5 years of NFL experience when the contract expires leaves Edmunds holding all the cards. What I’m thinking is that when a drafted player is ultra young then it would serve the administration better to recontract such player by no later than year 3 before the player has more time to validate himself, hence his value/cost skyrockets. In Edmunds’ case I realize he never blew anyone away with his play so the Bills waited until the next year and then again waited again the following year after that in which he finally did play good and then became unaffordable for the Bills. If the Bills still couldn’t get an accurate bead on him after his 3rd year then when the Bills exercised the 5th year option with him then they should have traded him by the end of the 4th year or even extend him by that time. Allowing Edmunds to finish his contract left the Bills high and dry imo. If anyone wants to say that well at least the Bills will get a compensatory pick for him is very disappointing compensation if you ask me. Drafting 1st rders and just ending up with a compensatory pick is poor management imo.
Alternatively, do not draft 19 year olds.
-
2
-
5
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, purple haze said:
At 27, unless a talent like Robinson is there, they should be trying to trade back anyway. We can most definitely use an extra 3rd. Problem is: who would teams be trading up for?
Tanner McGee
-
1 minute ago, SCBills said:
I’m concerned that we may be sitting there at 27 watching another run on WR’s before we pick
There are no WR's that are sure things in this draft. There are a bunch of guys who do have a chance to be WR1s. Some of those guys will be around in rds 3, 4 and 5. Again, not sure things, but legit lottery tickets.
Beane still looking to add big bodied RB to roster
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
Most draft prognastication websites have Roschon Johnson projected in the third round.