JDHillFan

Nobody is just part racist. Maybe someone of color will label them with a slur you have shown yourself comfortable with and you can cheer that person on.

You have a phrase that you don’t mind using for people like this. It’s two words. Begins with U, ends with m. Go for it. You know you want to. It’s just an opinion after all.

Which of his writings do you take exception to?

No

It was an outrageously absurd claim that had zero point to it and you repeated it more than once. It goes in the Hall of Fame of ridiculousness. Sorry. Powerline is operated by some well-respected conservative attorneys. Why don’t you consider broadening your horizons and then come back and tell us what you disagree with from their writings. It will make you appear to be marginally independent and less Tiberius-ish.

Agree. YouTube on the other hand is irrefutable. That’s where I go when I want to learn about nazi flags in churches. 🤦‍♂️🤦🤦‍♀️

There was a time when Tiberius was the runaway leader in the dimmest bulb competition. Things are starting to heat up.

Seems like you are interested in going back to a time when it was ok for a white man to throw slurs at a black man or cheer others on as they do it. You are the only person on this board, generally made up of toxic people, that does it. On top of that you try to brush it away as “just an opinion”, all the while playing the righteous indignation card at those that think differently than you do. There’s no splaining someone that behaves as you do. Sick.

Because they are just opinions, right?

Racial slurs are now ok per redhawk. They just need to be directed at people you disagree with. Sick.

A senate committee chaired by democrats voted unanimously to condemn the racist comments towards Clarence Thomas that came from Keith Ellison. You have cheered those comments on. Seems odd that you would be playing the high and mighty role re: racism this morning. Splain.

Two days ago you referred to your own use of a racial slur as “having an opinion”. To quote you, “splain”. also - you are too old to be using splain. Are you also wearing a flat-billed hat pulled over your ears?

I think you should run with the “soccer moms are hate-filled extremists” ball. Someone labeled them after all. At some point you might like to share some of the awful things these ladies have done. Things like looking out for their kids and all. 🤦‍♂️🤦🤦‍♀️

And despite being one who likes to say “that’s not evidence” it’s good enough for you. Someone labeled them!

My first exposure was when the President of the United States put a spotlight on him. You should spend less time watching for signs of wokeness in action films and more on current events.

If one had enough time on their hands to review posting histories, it would be clear who spends more of their time thinking of DJT. Don’t be too hard on yourself though. The orange jackass broke weak-minded people coming and going. You’ve got tons of company.

He may be under the impression he can get away with certain things. How he got to possibly thinking that way is anyone’s guess.

One comment and one question: I don’t care for the modern day democrat agenda. If that makes me MAGA or a nazi in your eyes there’s not a lot I can do about that. That’s the comment. You can tell by the punctuation. The question - who do you imagine, you or me, spends more of their day thinking about the hefty orange menace?

Solid content here. Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts.

Just want to make sure I understand where you are coming from. It now appears you wait for solid evidence rather than engaging in supposition based on common sense and logic. Particularly so when it relates to a 50 year creature of Washington. Seems at odds with many of your other posts. Consistency is overrated though.

You don’t want to trust your well-known logic here for some reason. Seems out of character.

You are going with Hunter Biden, crackhead loser, tricked multiple foreign entities out of $17M and they were most likely stunned to learn they were left holding the bag. That’s something! Please reconsider the next time you intend to play the logic and common sense cards. They don’t work when your main impulse is to reflexively defend a 50 year creature of Washington.

Let’s move off the bribe, for which there is not currently hard evidence to prove, and consider influence peddling. Does common sense and logic tell you it occurred in exchange for 17,000,000? Or was it just Hunter’s people skills that reeled that in? Did he dupe the world? I’m trying to figure exactly where we should GTFO with facts and logic as you apply them.

Hunter Biden, a delinquent, was able to squeeze $17,000,000 from foreign entities with them getting absolutely nothing in return other than Hunter talking up what his father might be able to do. Your position is that Hunter Biden outsmarted all these foreign entities to the tune of 17M? Many times you have painted yourself here as the arbiter of common sense and logic. This makes sense to you? This is logical?

The IRS whistleblower revealed that 17 million was delivered to the Bidens from foreign sources and you would like people to believe that it’s from the business acumen of a crackhead that cannot keep track of his guns, taxes, or computers and is independent of his relationship with a Washington power player of the last 50 years. This is logic and facts to you as indicated with your use of “GTFO with that logic and facts”? Do I have that right? Rhetorical question. You were making more sense when you were on your “so many people are talking about sex because gay people exist” routine. GTFO. The dems never missed a chance to get their Trump itch scratched. What do the facts and logic say about them not looking into Kushner when they had total control of government for two years?