JDHillFan

You just said “it’s pretty clear now”. How clear exactly if you won’t comment until the transcript comes out? Just tell us the damn crime. Please answer this simple question* - based on your expertise and what appears to be your close following of this riveting event, has the other crime ever been specified before now? Your answer will obviously be used as a cudgel against the other barrister of the board so please answer carefully. *The simple question is actually a rhetorical one so no need to think it over.

Thank you for the detailed response. I am now satisfied.

Can anyone tell me what “the other crime” is yet? What specific law is Trump alleged to have broken as part of “the other crime”? https://reason.com/2024/05/24/prosecutors-are-still-hedging-on-exactly-what-crime-trump-tried-to-aid-or-conceal/ Donald Trump is charged with 34 felonies in New York because he allegedly falsified business records to conceal "another crime." In the run-up to Trump's trial, which began last month and is expected to conclude next week, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was cagey about exactly what that other crime was. His prosecutors suggested several possibilities without picking one in particular, and they are still hedging on this crucial point. It looks like the case will go to the jury with that central question unresolved. Chigoose says it’s crystal clear and everyone else out there is wrong on the matter. Can someone, ANYONE please clarify? I don’t want to have to rely on the guy that classified bussing of migrants to America’s great metropolises as “human trafficking”.

A-hole alert! Cue the outrage from Gene, Roundy, daz, Tibs, lil billsy.

This puts the mental fitness question to bed. unsaid by Goldman - he’s also spry for his age.

“Spectacular“ -me “That’s not funny“ -every board lefty. Heck, every lefty.

Then you should be able to tell us in a fraction of a sentence the specific tax and FECA laws that have been broken that he is being charged with. Virtually every legal analyst of note out there cannot do so. They are not in your league as you stated previously they have not read the documents and are wish casting. Please tell us.

You are smarter than every legal analyst out there. That’s impressive!

Smerconish radio show on SiriusXM opening this morning – “the question facing the jury is what is the other crime?” They should just ask Chigoose. He knows what it is because it’s spelled out in the charging documents. 🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽🤦🏽‍♀️

sigh…

Build back better? Let’s go Brandon.

This thread has become a total drag. Why did the WaPo have to “nothing to see here” this story just as the wedgies were getting tightest? Serious buzzkill.

At least now I know I’m not missing anything from you on the football side of the board. 🤦🏽‍♀️🤦🏽🤦🏽‍♂️

They seem like a nice family.

The left have a stick up their ass example 358,932. That’s not meant to be a slur towards gay men so please put your dudgeon down. It’s a slur towards the humorlessness of the typical liberal. Thank you for playing to type.

The comment about the meme police arriving was mostly sardonic but I guess it’s good to see someone grabbing the mantle. Good for you! Good for you? Not sure which punctuation mark to use.

Meme/tweet police arriving in 3…2…

beating Frankish to the punch

Lol

Total dumbassery on your part. I don’t care what anyone here calls anyone else. When someone, like you, makes something up and pretends it to be beyond reproach, I like to call them on it. You make it easy. At least you have given up on the 1 million part and made it about Lindbergh. Lindbergh with an h at the end. A historian of your caliber should know that. You made more sense when you were pretending to know what the Strategic Petroleum Reserve was. It’s easy to understand why you won’t take the All in the Family bait. Good for you. Hopefully you learn the pointlessness of embellishment. Unlikely, I know. It’s almost as bad as the jackass here that wanted people to think he went to school with Susan Collins.

I don’t need you to show me gravity but thank you nonetheless. All I have asked is for you to back up the baseless claim you made. You can’t (there is not a single reference you can cite)and evidently all you have left is “some people listened to Charles Lindbergh”. Why on earth did you claim that Edith Bunker played video games?

Your first paragraph here is commonly known as “deflection”. Incredibly weak on your part. You made a ridiculous statement several days ago, one that you tried to lend an air of authority to with “you may not be aware” that you can’t corroborate with a single reference. That’s on you. I will donate to the anti-nazi charity of your choice if you can find a post where I call someone a commie. You don’t want to spend a lot of time looking. Would be a waste.

A good part of your schtick is to make a ridiculous claim, be completely unwilling to back it up despite having access to the internet, and then spinning and spinning as you are questioned on the original ridiculous claim. I will gladly move along if you can provide a single link where you gleaned the information that “America first is a group of 1 million American nazis”. Should be easy enough, right? Rhetorical question as such a link does not exist. The only place it exists is in your imagination. Now, about Edith Bunker and those video games…

one MILLION American nazis keep digging