Ta111
-
Posts
594 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Ta111
-
-
Looked like he was throwing it away. Unreal catch.
-
1 minute ago, nucci said:
if he is healthy enough to be backup, why wouldn't he start?
Exactly. You’re either in or out of protocol. He’s going to start Sunday.
-
2
-
1
-
-
He was taking the equivalent of first team reps today. Unless he has some sort of setback he’s playing.
-
Just now, klos63 said:
Other than that, it's the same playbook. I agree there is a difference, just don't see it being that big of one as far as planning goes. Add a couple things, maybe take out a couple...
Agreed it’s the same playbook, but you will probably use it differently based upon the QB’s strengths and weaknesses.
-
1 minute ago, klos63 said:
Coaches, by league rule, are not allowed to comment on the status of the player in concussion protocol. Also, the player is not to made available to reporters. So it's not BS.
And I don't think that it's a significant advantage to not be sure who the starter is. It's probably not as complicated as people think. It's not like we change the playbook.
The difference is your defense has to play a lot different if Allen plays vs Barkley. Most teams keep a spy on Allen and won’t against Barkley so it does make a significant difference.
-
1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said:
He’s playing Sunday.
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, VW82 said:
He wasn't suggesting that, nor was I. He just meant that even if Josh clears McD will likely leave it as a game time decision and force Tenn to have to prepare for both, which given the difference in styles is actually a big advantage for us.
Exactly, the team can always make the decision to play or not play someone even if the protocol has been met.
-
1 minute ago, Seven-N-Nine said:
Wow, he actually checks down. Hope Allen is watching.
Actually all his passes are check downs. The announcers even mentioned his average pass goes about 3yards in the air.
-
1
-
-
Interesting comment by McDermott on Jones lack of effort. https://www.newyorkupstate.com/buffalo-bills/2019/09/zay-jones-shouldve-become-a-defender-on-josh-allen-int-bills-sean-mcdermott-says.html
-
1 minute ago, NoSaint said:
Contact is a key element of the penalty it seems. If a DB ran in front of a receiver and the receiver tripped trying to avoid him we wouldn’t expect a flag without contact to bring a more common but relatively analogous situation to think about
That may be what the officials yesterday were looked at but they would be incorrect. If you stop your route right in front of the defender, causing the defender to go around, it is PI. Otherwise you are telling DB’s to make sure if a receiver stops immediately in front of you to make sure you contact him to get the call. That certainly isn’t the point tent of the rule.
-
12 minutes ago, Mark80 said:
Uhhh, you can't have pass interference without touching the guy. It's pretty simple. As others stated, he should have ran into him. He didn't. So no PI. End of story, unfortunately.
Wrong. Any act that hinders the defender. There doesn’t need to be contact.
-
38 minutes ago, DaBillsFanSince1973 said:
don't blame him for being pissed. they had a chance at that game. defense held brady and company to 9 points. offense scored 10. had they not got the blocked punt this could of been a bills win.
yeah, I'm kind of pissed too. I picked the bills to lose but I woke up yesterday really feeling they win. well, as the saying goes, can't hang with the big dogs, stay off the porch.
they still have a way to go to hang with the contenders of the league, unfortunately.
Yea, about 1 1/2 yards.
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, JoPar_v2 said:
At some point, you have to wonder if Zay is as bad as so many of you hysterics say he is, why is he still out there every week for 75-80% of the offensive snaps? I mean, someone THAT terrible should be extremely easy to leapfrog on the depth chart, yes? Perhaps you all should start blaming the coaching staff a bit more.
I think they are blaming the staff.
-
2 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:
Look at the column entitled "catch percentage" in the rushing and receiving category and look at line 11: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/buf/2019.htm
Yea, interesting that we have all those 80% receivers and Jones is at 38%.
-
Just now, RyanC883 said:
apparently because Josh Allen is the more "favored child." Due to this, Zay gets blamed for not catching the wildly inaccurate passes that Allen throws to him.
I don’t understand why people keep bringing this up when other receivers can make tough catches from these “wildly inaccurate” passers. He just doesn’t seem to be able to fight through tough coverage.
-
1
-
-
Just now, CuddyDark said:
Can't catch from bad QBs.
Yet Knox made a contested catch at the end of the first half and Smoke made one with Gilmore all over him. When was the last time Jones made a similar catch?
-
1
-
-
I just don’t remember him making a “contested” catch. We’ve already seen Knox and some younger players come down with 50/50 balls. You need top receivers to come down with some of these catches.
-
1
-
-
Man, the Packers D is pretty bad. Unless they get turnovers they are in trouble.
-
I’ve said this before-85% of all games are won, or lost, in the 4th quarter. You win the 4th and you generally win the game.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Da webster guy said:
The worst offender of all is Sal Maiorana from the Rochester D and C. He's the new Jerry Sullivan.
Unbelievably cynical and depressing.
One guy on this board was upset that we haven't had a 300 yard passer in years.
Just had a huge home opener win to remain undefeated and he went online and posted a new topic on how embarrassed he is.
Some people.....
Agreed. There are a few clowns who frankly don’t understand the game.
-
5 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:
This iOS right. The rule doesn't consider the player's perception.
If he had popped up a second or 2 quicker, it's a safety.
There's no reason to run into your own EZ
Did you not watch the game.? The ref not only blew his whistles but he signaled the play dead.
-
2
-
-
29 minutes ago, rayray808 said:
23/36 - 243 yards - 1 TD, 1 INT - 9 carries for 46 yards
WEEK 1: B-
WEEK 2: B
WEEK 3: C+
Today we got to see "streaky Josh" and it is my biggest fear about him. I am okay however if it is a few bad plays during a quarter, followed by a game winning drive. I just donʻt want his "lows" to last entire games.
I had him at a B-, however the INT is inexcusable... especially after experiencing the intentional grounding call. That should have been the light bulb moment. Heck, even the fumble should have been a learning moment where he realizes he just needs to settle in and put the nail in the coffin.
All in all, he is still progressing along enough to prove that he can take over this franchise and lead us to greatness. Today just happened to be his worst game of the season thus far IMO.
And he also made plays now other QB can make. That escape from a sure sack and 1st down was special.
-
2
-
-
Not only did the whistle blow but the refs signaled the play dead. Plays like this happen all the time.
-
6
-
2
-
-
Josh Allen in concussion protocol: Update cleared 10/5
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
I really don’t understand the “almost” cleared view of a few on here. You’re either completely cleared or you’re not. It’s like the old joke of “almost” pregnant. If he’s cleared, that means he’s fine to play. If he’s not cleared he’s not fine to play.