Backintheday544

Thats the one floating around Reddit

The shooters Instagram had: “Praise the Lord ️ in my quest to end Epsteins evil empire PA Born and bred ", Maybe the Florida doc release of Trumps pedo activity was the last straw? https://duckduckgo.com/?q=tmcrooks03&ia=we

Everything is pointing to this guy being a registered Republican gun nut who wanted to end people with Epstein connections. the media should plaster Katie Johnson’s allegations against Trump every time this comes up so people know the shooters motivation.

The shooters Instagram had: “Praise the Lord ️ in my quest to end Epsteins evil empire PA Born and bred ", Maybe the Florida doc release of Trumps pedo activity was the last straw? https://duckduckgo.com/?q=tmcrooks03&ia=web

And I believe He wanted Trump to lose in 2020 and he wants Trump to lose in 2024. We will see whose God wins.

Let’s not praise this guy yet. God saved Trump but not this guy. There must have been a reason….

But the guy who was shot and killed didn’t have faith.

Like when Sarah Palin came out with this ad:

Go whine your therapist about the DEI hires that hurt you. The argument was clear. If a President assassinated a political opponent it could fall under official act. Im sorry your reading comprehension isn’t great. Maybe if you fell under DEI, you could have gone to a real school to learn things like how for read.

You’re such a snowflake.

Except i was quoting Trumps own attorney who said assassination could be an official act. Were you born this stupid or did you just grow into it?

I don’t know. Have you seen your comments 99 percent of the time? Trumps attorney in arguments: In a question to Sauer, Justice Sonia Sotomayor posed a hypothetical: If the president ordered the military to assassinate a rival he views as corrupt, “is that within his official act for which he can get immunity?” Sauer answered that, “it would depend,” but “we can see that could well be an official act.”

To add to the crazy, if Biden ordered the assassination, the US would have no criminal actions they could take against Biden.

is that not appropriate? I was quoting Trump after the Iowa school shooting. “I want to send our support and our deepest sympathies to the victims and families touched by the terrible school shooting yesterday in Perry, Iowa,” Trump said during a campaign rally. “It’s just horrible, so surprising to see it here. But have to get over it, we have to move forward,” he added. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna132610

It’s just horrible, so surprising to see it here. But have to get over it, we have to move forward

I graduated law school 4 years after Bush passed PSFL and before I went to law school decided I wanted to work for the IRS for 10 years to take part of Bush’s student loan forgiveness.

Bush passed the College Cost Reduction Act in 2008: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-bill/2669/all-actions?overview=closed&q={"roll-call-vote"%3A"all"} This was the law that created PSFL. PSFL allows people who work in the government to get loans forgiven after 10 years. So the reason it’s a thing is because of a Bushed backed law. Biden was just upholding the contractual terms from that law. Biden can’t just be like I’m going to ignore the law, I’m going to ignore the terms of the loan agreements people signed. PSFL is not unconstitutional and none of the forgiveness Biden has done so far has been found unconstitutional.

So you don’t support the $119 billion forgiven under the Bush law? Maybe it’s time to vote Dem

The better answer would be: Biden granted forgiveness of $167 billion. $119 billion is from PSFL and 20 year forgiveness. Both programs were contractually granted and originated under President Bush. $14 billion to students who were totally disabled, which is allowed per the loan contract they signed. $29 billion to schools who were fraudulent, which is a legal provision that originated prior to Biden. Biden can take responsibility for $5.5 billion of it through SAVE. So 1) if you don’t like it, blame Republicans for creating PSFL and 2) blame the contractual agreements that these lenders signed and the US government is abiding by the terms of those contracts.

The data book had the raw numbers on recruitment. Most stay in the IRS once there. A lot of people use it as a retirement plan and come at the end of their career and stay until the pension kicks in and retires). From the attorney side a lot will just stay until Public Student loan forgiveness kicks in and then leave for greener pastures. All IRS CI agents I know have been there a long time and don’t plan on leaving.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/irs-plans-audit-increase-who-will-be-targeted/ The IRS plans to triple the audit rates on large corporations with assets of more than $250 million. Audit rates for these companies will rise to 22.6% in tax year 2026 from 8.8% in 2019. Large partnerships with assets of more than $10 million will see their audit rates increase 10-fold, rising to 1% in tax year 2026 from 0.1% in 2019. Wealthy individuals with total positive income of more than $10 million will see their audit rates rise 50% to 16.5% from 11% in 2019 Their strategic plan calls for exactly that in 2024 as IRA funds hit the agency and agents are trained.

They said they wouldnt increase audits with the use of Inflation Reduction Act funds. You can’t just stop auditing people under $400k. 1) it’s a substantial population 2) everyone would put they made $399,999 on their returns.

For people under $200,000 of income, audit coverage is about 0.1 percent whereas audit coverage peaks at 3 percent for people in higher incomes.

You can have fun going through all the IRS statistics: https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-irs-data-book We have the 2023 tax gap estimate at $688 billion per year: https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-updates-tax-gap-projections-for-2020-2021-projected-annual-gap-rises-to-688-billion#:~:text=The %24688 billion gross tax,taxes and underpayment of taxes. 2023 Federal deficit was $1.7 trillion. So about 1/3 of our deficit is attributable to the Tax Gap in 2023. I don’t know how funding the IRS properly isn’t a bipartisan issue.