daz28

If you can read and understand like you claim, then you'll know that I was very clear this is an investigation by the House for legislative reasons, and not a matter for "law enforcement". The reason he will be begging for immunity won't be because he fears criminal prosecution for what they may find, but for the fact that he has ALREADY committed the crime of contempt of Congress. It's up to the committee(and DOJ) if they want to drop it now if he agrees to give testimony. He can't simply just show up now, and say, "sorry drop that charge i didn't mean it". That's not how the law works. Steve Bannon is simply being used as an example for others not to test the committee's patience. The'yre playing 3D legal chess, and apparently you, and a lot of other people still don't see the moves. The executive privilege thing is CERTAIN to fail(precedent), and now pretending they can avoid contempt is no longer an option. I'm not naive. I know the goal of the Democrats isn't to prosecute or legislate, or any of that nonsense. It's to bring the facts to light, which will hurt the Reuplican's politically. Even though the tribunal is indeed a farce, it carries political weight, and it was their own mistake to follow the orange doofus into the trap, even though it was largely unavoidable. That's the Republican politician's achilles heel is that they're doomed if they stick with him, or if they go against him. We'll see how much of this is my imagination. Apparently, Meadows got his warning shortly after Bannon got his 2 count indictment. Just read that.

Imagine a world where all people who were fired or resigned, because they did something that other employees did, but didn't get in trouble for, are given huge settlements. First, it creates a zero tolerance policy for ALL work policies/practices, and then requires the employer to fully disclose all misdeeds by all employees equally in a timely manner. I hope there's a ton of money in that infrastructure for courthouses and law schools. If his own union didn't stick up for him, and he admitted to the wrong-doing, then this is just sour grapes to get a settlement. If I were him, I'd be mad, but this kinda stuff happens to people every day, and I don't think the court system untintentionally setting some kind of impossible to manage equal justice for fired employees policies is the answer. There was no slander or libel here. These were his own words, so there's no defamation.

All I was doing was correcting him that it wasn't enumerated in the Constitution. Then he made a point that it is still Constitutional, because the Supreme Court says it doesn't go against it. As far as the truth goes, I said it's political theater, and a side effect of that is I get to hear the truth. I had no clue as to what Timmy was even talking about with the whole 10 month senate thing, and still don't. No messes here, but there sure is in the Trump camp about who's gonna BEG for immunity first, so they can run to the House and testify before someone else scoops up that deal first. There gonna slap them once to get them to talk, and then have to slap them 10 times to shut them back up. All the questions about what they thought was supposedly election fraud is gonna be pure comedy. Example: " Well, I didn't really have any proof of election fraud, but I was just believeing what so and so was saying", until the whole circle jerk blames each other. Don't miss it!

I think what he's trying to say is if you look at the wikipedia page that lists all instances of contempt since 1975, that you will see that up until recently most cases ended up with compliance. This would lead any rational person to believe that people recently have been attempting to flaunt non-compliance, and it's about time we started MAKING LAW AND ORDER GREAT AGAIN. That's like saying why bother looking into the causes of the Civil War, because all you can really do next time is have bigger armies. Ridiculous argument. Why bother studying anything to see if it can be handled better in the future??? I'll get back to you AFTER I find out all the facts, ok?

It's mentally exhausting trying to explain to the common sense hypocrtites what their OWN common sense ideals that they've backed forever are. Do they completely forget, or are they just messing with our heads? Do the crime do the time, play stupid games win stupid prizes(lookin at you Kyle), just follow orders, etc

Try reading, this is exactly what I said, "while the house committe is investigating to help understand what legislation may be needed to prevent another insurrection, aka their job." How in God's creation did you get that I said they are doing a criminal investigation??? BTW, you're the one talking about some trial in the house and senate that happened 10 months ago. That was so ridiculous, that I didn't even bother to ask you what the hell you were talking about.

He's arguing that you can't be law and order, and still think that they all should be able to just ignore legal subpeonas without being a hypocrite. While it most surely is a "political stunt", the bonus to the American people is that they will hear the facts. I'm completely ok with that trade off. Asking politicians not to politic is like asking your cat not to cough up furballs, especially in today's politics. No one makes everything more political than Donald Trump, so once again, you can't hate the Democrats for doing it, while Trump does, without being a hypocrite.

In a criminal case, there is a doctrine of double jeopardy. That's why the prosecution has to have all their facts in BEFORE the trial, because once it's over, then it's over. This is a committe investigation(not a trial), and obviously they feel there's still many, many facts to uncover. There is absolutley nothing illegal about how Congress is handling this, and not even the staunchest Trumplican will even attempt to claim such. That's why they(and the people who they brainwash) call it a waste of time or witch hunt. They claim that they should be busy obstructing any and all legislation in Congress, instead. The FBI is investigating criminal offenses(their job), while the house committe is investigating to help understand what legislation may be needed to prevent another insurrection, aka their job.

It's winning, because Americans are sick of people thinking they are above the law, and can see accountability, and the law being followed. It just so happens that the Democrats did it, while Trump broke his campaign promise to do so. Finding out the truth behind what REALLY went down on Jan 6th(and leading up to), and the false claims of election fraud, which had its day in court isn't a game. If following the law is "scoring", then yes, I'm all about scoring. The reason the country is going down the toilet is up for debate, but to be angry about finding out why is ridiculous. The fact you feel it's "pointless" is irrelevant, and if it's a waste of "your" time, then let it go Elsa. I hate to break this to you, but Trump would have in zero ways spent ANY "time" persuing Hillary. This may come as a shock to you, but even though Trump wishes he made policy or had control over the judicial/DOJ, it is a commonly held belief that it is independent. The fact is either his DOJ was either completely imcompetent, or there was no 'there' there with all the Hillary nonsense he sold to you all at the rallies. The coup-laid was too watery.

I think we're on the same page here, just some confusion. Obviously not every law or power is enumerated in the Constitution, but the power of Congress to issue subpeonas is not in there. The power to do so however has passed judicial review.

Ok, so the truth comes out, you're mad the "lefties" are winning by enforcing the law, that you guys normally so adamantly preach should be followed. If a 100% legal court case is one in which you feel is a "waste of your time", I suggest you just ignore it. Are you still ignoring the fact that Trump's DOJ failed to hold Hillary and Holder to the law like he promised he would, too???

Google 'judicial review'

What's your point? Should the law not be respected? I thought you guys were mad about immigration laws not being followed??? Selective much? Don't like it, elect legislators who will change it. That's how Democracy works.

Not trying to nitpick, but it's not an enumerated power, but it is a law that the Supreme Court is fully behind.

Is that the best you guys got? Hasn't Tucker told you what to parrot yet??? This is MOST CERTAINLY a law: Title 2, Section 192 of US code. Right now you guys are literally the guy choking meme, and it's pretty embarassing.

Look at the bright side. When they're all finished snitching on each other to save their hides, they will have an open forum on national TV to display all their proof of election fraud. 🤣

2 counts. One for failing to appear, and one for refusing to provide documents. Awful quiet in here from the Trump gang. Must be tough to be pro law and order, and also pro ignore the subpeona. I guess if I was in that boat all I'd have to offer was "witch hunt".

"LOCK THEM UP" "LOCK THEM UP"

Li'l Lucky

Sometimes they can pass rush, but it's offset by the fact that they all too often completely miss a block. As for run blocking, as long as we run the Allen Packer's power sweep, it's effective.

I think Mongo has been playing through a lingering injury. Hope they give him adequate rest for a couple weeks.

Better athlete confirmed

wonder if chris notices how were keepin mahomes off the field

11 pts aint crap. GOOOO

holding flag from far side poooor bills