Jump to content

Old Coot

Community Member
  • Posts

    658
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Old Coot

  1. 12 hours ago, Hebert19 said:

    Let's hope Von can help us close games out.

    Von will be double-teamed on crucial downs.  Either he'll need to beat those double-teans or someone else on the DL-LB corps will need to step up.

     

    I'm not saying that Von can't beat the double-teams.  When he is double-teamed that means there's an opportunity for the other DL or a blitzing LB to get to the QB.

  2. 4 hours ago, Steptide said:

    There's like 10 people at this game. Probably rain and Easter 

    A story perhaps apocryphal: at one of the AFL NY Titans early games there were so few fans that the players went into the stands to thank those attending.

  3. On 4/5/2022 at 1:37 PM, T&C said:

    April 5, 1974 - BILLS INTRODUCE NEW LOGO
    The Bills announced a major change in the team's logo for the 1974 season. Gone was the red standing buffalo that had been the team's mark since 1962. It was replaced by a blue charging buffalo with a red streak, the crowning achievement of artist Stevens Wright.

    The initial Bills' helmets in 1960 & 1961 were silver with the jersey number in blue on each side:

     

    https://www.buffalorumblings.com/2011/2/9/1984140/buffalo-bills-uniforms-throughout-the-years

  4. I'm an Old Coot.  I remember Tommy O'Connell handing off to Ritchie Lucas & throwing passes to Elbert "Golden Wheels" Dubenion, Jackie Kemp handing off to Cookie Gilchrist and throwing passes to Dubenion & Glenn Bass.  Ed Rutkowski (former Erie County Exec) was on that team.

     

    I remember the loss to the KC Chiefs in the 1966 AFL Championship game.  If the Bills had won they would have played in the first NFL-AFL Championship game.  Somewhat later the annual game was renamed the Superbowl.

     

    My interest in the Bills has waxed & waned over the years with the team's success.  It's waxing now.  Hopefully the team will win a Superbowl before I join the Choir Eternal.

  5. On 3/25/2022 at 3:09 PM, mushypeaches said:

    I think that your logic here is accurate - the salary cap structure isn't going to tolerate having top WR's paid like QB's.  What's going to happen is that smart GM's start to understand that the incremental benefit of having a top WR isn't worth the incremental cost, and the position overall will start to get de-valued.  Similar to what happened with RB's over the last 20-25 years. 

     

    It's not quite the same comparison, but the market correction will occur, and eventually teams will begin treating WR's like more "fungible" assets.  That's going to be a hard lesson to learn for top shelf WR's, but it's going to happen now that these salaries are getting downright ridiculous.  And the value of first contract WR's is going to be even more critical

    This is a very interesting theory.  If the WR position gets degraded because of huge QB contracts and the RB position has already been degraded does that mean that offensive production gets degraded & defenses improve? Is this why in recent memory the NFL has tweked rules to encourage offensive production?

     

    I remember when you could mug the receivers until the ball ws in the air and then mug the QB for good measure.

  6. I'm guessing that Beane & Co have a plan for this since they let Levi Wallace walk.

     

    Whether that plan is successful is another matter.

     

    As the noted philosopher Michael Tyson once said, "Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth."

     

    • Like (+1) 2
  7. 1 hour ago, NewEra said:

    gen·er·a·tion·al

    /ˌjenəˈrāSH(ə)nəl/

    Learn to pronounce

    adjective

    relating to or characteristic of all the people born and living at about the same time, regarded collectively.

    "generational differences in television usage"

    relating to the different generations of a particular family.

    "a compelling generational saga"
     

    it’s a word.  Why is this even a thing?

    It's a perfectly cromulent word.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Haha (+1) 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  8. Sign.jpg.85f29c6eca2ffbc1f01569da8d127a30.jpg

    21 minutes ago, JayBaller10 said:

    Just read in this same article a NY better laid down $5,000 for the Jets to win it all at 200-1 odds. $5,000. I mean, there’s better ways to blow that kind of money. It’s easy to see why Vegas stays rich

    Those fancy casinos aren't built by the winners; they're built by the losers.

    • Agree 1
  9. 59 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

    Except when it’s intercepted.... seemed like Carroll forgot the old chestnut about 3 things that can happen when you pass and 2 of them are bad.

    You are right on both counts but its a low risk throw.  Malcolm Butler made a great play on the ball.  I read afterward that the Pats practiced against that pattern and Butler wasn't able tp prevent a completion but learned from his mistake.

  10. 10 minutes ago, BobbyC81 said:

    Nothing may ever…ever…ever…be worse than the Seahawks throwing a pass at the goal line when they could’ve just handed off to Marshawn Lynch.

    I thought so, too until I heard Pete Carroll's reasoning:  If Lynch does not get in the clock keeps running.  By throwing a low risk pass like that, it's either a TD because the Pats expect a run or its incomplete stopping the clock and giving the Seahawks more time to run more plays.

     

    Remember Lynch is hard to bring down once he gets going but he can be stopped behind the line.

     

    I'm not saying that I agree with carroll but his reasonong makes some sense.

×
×
  • Create New...