Jump to content

ChronicAndKnuckles

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,554
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ChronicAndKnuckles

  1. 11 hours ago, Big Turk said:

    I know they don't always work out but I LOVE McDermott putting his fate in the hands of Josh Allen when it's easier to kick the FG. I don't think we realize how rare that is for a defensive coach to be able to step out of that defensive mindset and be aggressive offensively on 4th downs repeatedly in key moments.

     

    There would have been coaches from previous years that would have punted on the 4th and inches from the Bills 33 and hoped the D got the ball back for the offense one more time.

    I think most coaches go for that on 4th and inches with under 5 minutes especially against a team like KC where u might not get it back. I think it’s a no brainer. 

  2. 1 minute ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:


    I don’t think it matters at all.

     

    If I HAD to choose, I’d rather play the broncos than the chargers in the playoffs, so them I suppose 

    Yeah I was leaning towards the Broncos myself. One more loss to the Chargers would be helpful in securing that #1 seed. 

  3. 1 hour ago, aristocrat said:

    Heinecke time 

    Have no idea why they didn’t try building around Heinecke. Definitely a capable guy if given a solid defense and running game. 

    1 hour ago, SageAgainstTheMachine said:

    Most people thought Wentz was on track to do what Josh is doing now back in 2017.  Five years later and he's the guy you get when you want to look like you aren't tanking but you are.

    Still puzzled about what happened to Wentz. Such a promising QB in his early days. I remember my friends who were Eagles fans were ecstatic.

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  4. 10 hours ago, Livinginthepast said:

    Romo is the best colour guy in decades. Nantz for me is is ok , just like pat Summeral.  Romo is such a breath of fresh air after years of hearing from dolts like Dierdorf and his fawning over "Tom" or Collinsworth or B team guys like Solomon Willcots.

    I can’t watch Solomon Wilcots without associating him with the drought and 1pm games. Or Dede Spero for that matter. 
     

    What was that other guys name who was always so extra during the games ? I loved that guy. Can’t remember his name. 

  5. 6 hours ago, mrags said:

    My point still stands. McKenzie is not the answer 

    Von wasn’t either right? 
     

    im the last one in this board that has been crazy about the OBJ love. I think it’s overrated. But the fact is, McKenzie has not stepped up in the role of replacing Beasley. He would absolutely 100% be benched in favor of Crowder by now if he was healthy too. I love McKenzie. One of the best personalities on this team and is absolutely needed in the locker room imo. But I’d rather keep him to a gadget guy with limited touches. He’s had 2 good games in his career. Maybe 3. Other than that he’s shown he’s not a starter in this league. He’s a #4-6 at best. 

    Von Miller was an elite guy at a position of dire need.

     

    OBJ is NOT elite (hasn’t been since 2016) and WR is not a position of need. Depth is always good, but that’s why we signed Crowder and drafted Shakir. 
     

    2 totally different scenario completely. 

     

  6. 4 hours ago, mrags said:

    This is 100% correct.
     

    And this is exactly the reason why we should make a play for OBJ. As much as I like McKenzie, and as no I as he is a great team guy, he is no ODB. This offense would be incredibly better with someone like OBJ. Shakir is very good and will be the future of this team a slot. But not yet. After we win the Lombardi this year should be fine. 

    The OBJ worship on this board is nuts. We have plenty of capable guys. Why not Shakir? Why not yet? Guy has produced plain & simple. OBJ is the massively overrated and not the missing piece. 

  7. 46 minutes ago, Ya Digg? said:

    This-1:04 with 2 timeouts is better than 1:40 with no timeouts 

    We scored on 2nd down so it essentially would’ve been 1:40 with one time out, but who knows what might’ve happened if they had called one

    30 minutes ago, SageAgainstTheMachine said:

    I was convinced that we needed the turnover to win.  1:04 with two timeouts and 4 down territory all the way down the field is a perfect script for Mahomes.  

    I would’ve took the extra 40 seconds. They always have the option to spike it or throw a sideline pass. I still think 40 seconds is more valuable than an extra time out 🤷🏻 but I’m not an SB winning NFL coach 

  8. Not sure if this was posted, but KC had 2 time outs I believe on Buffalo’s last drive when we were near the goal line. Instead of using them they let the clock run down to 1:04. Don’t understand this strategy at all. Buffalo is down 3 and is pretty much guaranteed at least a field goal, but you have to know a touchdown is very possible. I think it would make more sense for KC to burn a Time out, Buffalo scores a TD, and then be left with 1:40ish + one last time out on their final drive. What am I missing ? Seems like bad clock management. 

×
×
  • Create New...