Ol Dirty B
-
Posts
3,209 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Ol Dirty B
-
-
3 minutes ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said:
I agree the O-Line has been bad for both QB's but the Chargers have the best D-Line in the NFL and they pressured a QB like I've never seen before. There is no way you can honestly say that you could get a true evaluate of a QB with the way Peterman was being pressured.
The O-Line has played average against weaker defenses and gave Taylor at least some time to throw. We know what Taylor is and we know he will not be here after this season. If we lose vs KC and Peterman isn't starting I will question McD ability to make his own decisions. You know McD wants Peterman to start because he knows Taylor is gone next year and the team as a whole is not ready to compete for a playoff spot. I wish he just would've stared Taylor vs the Chargers because they would've copied the Jets game plan and Taylor would've been done for good after that.
So I take it you didn't see the first half of the Jets game?
The chargers have a good defense, but they are not that great. Pressured a QB like you've never seen before? That's just making things up to support a position.
-
1 hour ago, PIZ said:
Tryrod needs to understand WHY he was benched, AND correct his game. I hope he gets it.
Because he's black? Should he go white face for McDermott and the fans and throw 5 ints? Then it becomes he has potential, gunslinger, it's not all on him
-
15 hours ago, GoBills808 said:
Is it just me, or does that article not make...sense? Like terribly written and contradictory all the time?
Shady not running much out of shotgun? Well, that would be a problem except his YPC under center is better this year...so...fire Dennison? Article is rife with these.
Also rambles through racial undertones of benching Taylor. 3/10 would not read again.
Of course you wouldn't. It's critical of the Bills.
13 hours ago, Heitz said:TT isn't terrible, who knows what Nate is (I need more than one game to make an informed decision), but neither is a guy that makes you say THAT'S our Franchise QB!
eh... 5 Int's make me feel pretty confident saying Nate is terrible. I'm envious of your level of denial.
-
2 minutes ago, QCity said:
No coach is ever going to say "it's a rebuilding year." Yeah, that would really sit great with vets like Shady and Kyle.
It's not the coach's fault you can't read between the lines. Honest question - what did you think was going to happen when they accumulated 10 draft picks? Were you expecting them to trade those picks before the deadline to make a November push?
Amen.
You're right about the fans, but does he owe it to guys like Shady or more so Kyle? A guy who is debating retirement then luring him back talking about making a run for the playoffs, or at least that was the speculation.
Then getting a guy like Boldin, trying to get him sign, selling him on a run, then trading your number 1. Good for Boldin for retiring, and how does Kyle trust this coaching staff if they indeed told him they wanted to make a run this year and then they have last week happen.
These guys are terrible at judgment. Belichick manages it well, has a proven track record. McDermott seems to think that he can equal that by just shipping out talent for less value and benching guys.
-
Well... Whaley was never really able to hire his own coach, so their was a constant rift between the FO and coaching staff which leads to sides being picked and in turn leaks. It's not really an accomplishment stopping that, they are all gone.
It just appears everyone is McDermott's puppet now, so yea no leaks. Just terrible surprises like Sunday. Is that really an improvement?
Also with the leaks, it was all a mess. Does ownership take any blame? Why is it coming out right before the Pittsburgh game that Rex could be fired if they lose, or before the season both him and Whaley could be gone if they don't make the playoffs.
The Pegula's have been absolutely horrible, and they deserve a lot of the blame too.
-
14 minutes ago, Sweats said:
It doesnt really matter if McD called this a rebuilding year.............once fans see a 5-2 start, then its playoffs or bust.
Now if McD really wanted to make a statement, he should have stopped the talks of hope after starting so good and brought the fans back down to reality ASAP.
The guy won't even say he made the wrong decision by starting Peterman. I agree with you, and I agree with a lot being said.
His messaging is awful, but McDermott is not long for the league in my opinion. He's the typical football coach, he thinks he's smarter than everyone else in the room and just speaks in cliches. How else does he come to the determination that Peterman should have started? I'm biased at this point because I just find him annoying. They are in a tough position talking about winning now and building for later, but it is a bit of a political act. Whenever things go well, they're trying to win now. When they start Peterman, it's about the "bigger vision" not a giant mistake. I just don't trust these guys and I'm just a fan, if you're a player, how do you trust them at all? And this process ****, don't even get me started with this process stuff. I know they hired a guy so they don't repeat the Whaley/Lynn debacle of last year, which also Terry needs to step up and be a man about it. He's an awful public speaker so for him to potentially fire guys for failing a decision that he oversaw, he should get it. Terry created that whole disaster. But that PR guy they hired, tell him to stop saying using the word process or it's going to be thrown in their face over and over again. It actually makes McDermott sound unintelligent at a point, it's all bull ****.
He already sounded like he was getting short with Schopp and Bulldog on Monday, he's lucky it's Buffalo, a bigger market he'd be destroyed. They're saying he should be fired on PTI, it'd be way worse if he was McAdoo, Bowles, or Garrett.
-
1
-
-
16 hours ago, BuffaloBill said:
Personally I think Sammy Watkins is an overhyped one-trick pony. His game has not translated well to the NFL and injuries aside, he has never been as productive as all of his supporters want to believe he is. I am glad he is gone from the Bills. The Doug Whaley era will go down as one of the worst in Bills history. The price he paid for Watkins was as damaging as any of the collossal blunders made by the Bills over the years.
One of the worst in Bills history? You must have missed a lot of this teams history and I'm talking even pre-drought.
-
2 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:
Yeah the dead money was going to be there after the season too.
A sixth round pick for a Jags team that will be picking in the 20's most likely is close to worthless.............but hey, all the losing not being able to stop the run AT ALL is leading to could flip the Bills first round pick so far it will be like trading up 15 spots in round 1!
Lol fair point.
-
13 hours ago, Commonsense said:
Whaley is gone. The new guys cleaned house and have a pile of picks to use this upcoming draft. Chances are there will be plenty to B word about soon, if you can't wait then it's more than likely you are bitching just to B word.
Watkins hasn't gone on to have some crazy season, nor has Darby who just returned from injury. The Dareus contract was once deemed untradeable, they managed to move it off the books.
The Dareus contract is not off the books.
-
1 hour ago, xRUSHx said:
Your dreaming, a bounce back game on the road for Tyrod? I do not agree, Tyrod on the road is a joke always has been but to think a bounce back was possible against his old OC? This game had ugly written all over it regardless of who was starting iMO.
Lynn was licking his chops, we all know he would have done exactly what the Saints did to Tyrod, load the box and make Tyrod be a QB. Only difference was Peterman was throwing the turnover while Tyrod would have let the kicker do it for him. Sack, sack, sack, kick.
Team is a hot mess, this is all about next years draft now.
..
It was a loss but how was Taylor on the road vs Seattle on Monday night? After getting destroyed by NE.
-
7 hours ago, Kelly the Dog said:
I'm not so sure. We have a bunch of high picks. We could sign 3-4 solid players in free agency. And if we get rid of a couple more of our stars for sixth rounders, those picks could really pan out.
Uh? What stars? They have one and that's Lesean and you'll never get value for him at his age and position.
-
On 11/19/2017 at 8:11 PM, Wayne Arnold said:
Peterman still threw for more yards in one half than Taylor threw the entire game last week.
Just sayin...
God what a horrendously stupid post.
He threw for more interceptions in a half than Tyrod threw all year. Does that register in your mind at all?
I will even leave out the douchey, Just Sayin
No **** you are just saying it, i just read it.
On 11/19/2017 at 8:54 PM, Wayne Arnold said:Let's not pretend Taylor is flawless just because Peterman had a historically bad first outing. Receivers are open for great quarterbacks even when it looks like they aren't. Peterman was finding guys to throw to for the most part - he just was getting annihilated in the process.
In fact, maybe today really did have a silver lining: I never saw Taylor as aggressive with downfield throws in limited time than today. Like he had nothing to lose. (Except for his fumble). Maybe we'll see more aggressiveness from him as a result of the benching.
What the hell did you watch? First, no one thinks Tyrod is a franchise guy but he is clearly the best guy they have right now.
Peterman was finding guys to throw too? He completed 43% of passes. He completed just under that to the other team.
You think it's good quarterbacking to just loft the ball up like a punt instead of taking the sack? I mean those balls just hung in the air and were going way short of their targets. He was wreckless... And you find a silver lining in that maybe he could be even more aggressive? If I were you, I'd just blame my posts on poor diction because if it's not, you have absolutely horrible judgment.
-
On 11/15/2017 at 11:37 AM, KGun12TD said:
Great Move.
TT Season: 9 games played: 163/254, 64% Completed for 1684 yards with 10TDs, 3 Ints.
This is NOT an NFL Starting caliber QB!!!
Neither is 6/14, 43% Completed for 66 yards with 0 TD, 5 Ints.
Great move for a tank... too bad it's too late for that, they were competing for a playoff spot in a horrendous AFC.
It's not even debatable it was an awful move. That's everyone, local and national media, and fans alike are laughing at it. Unless you have some odd motive for it, or is just down right delusional.
-
If you're firing the DC this early into a defensive minded coach's tenure. You might as well just get rid of the HC.
-
I'm not sure if it's numb or I've gone nuts. I didn't like the hire to begin with and he just always seemed too college/hs coachy to me, but so do most football coaches to me.
I was so mad after the Watkins trade I told my boss don't go out of your way to give me Sundays off. I get a bonus for them and this team just didn't seem worth giving that up. After passing on going to the Raiders game and listening to the players, not the coach, speak after that game I thought maybe I was wrong. Maybe their is something to what I think is bs he preaches even though the TO differential and quality of victories gave me pause. But listening to Jordan Matthews talk about how no one wanted him, Tyrod, or McCoy. How they all got passed on, I finally caved and bought in. I didn't think we were on a run for years of playoffs, but maybe we were finally going to be the garbage over achieving team that gets a wild card spot.
Then the Jets game happens. And halfway through it, I'm just laughing hysterically. The weak fumbles everything. All I can think is, you people thought this **** was good?
Then I go to the Saints game and that was anger.
Then McDermott comes out and says Peterman is starting and I'm annoyed.
Then I catch the first half of the LA game and I'm
Hahahaha Trust the process... Hahaha you believed in this ****? Trust the process, you guys got played, and then it's
He said after the game that he "Regrets the result but not the decision" Hahahaha
Maybe something's wrong with me, like I said crazy, but you just have to laugh sometimes.
-
Think about it.
They gutted FO and scouting departments and let the guy who just made the decision to play Peterman at this specific point in time lead the rebuild of that.
We fear 20 years? This can reach 30 easily
I'm being dramatic obviously, but just wow. I don't trust any of these guys judgment over there.
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, joesixpack said:
9-7 is .500. Don’t be a douche
Are you drunk? 9-7 has never been considered .500
Do you need a math lesson?
-
53 minutes ago, HamSandwhich said:
Start Peterman again, he had a bad outing. Yes, a historically bad outing. He's a rookie and will need to take his lumps. Tyrod is done here in Buffalo, and with this D and how it's completely pooped the bed, there is no point in going back to him. Sink or swim rook! Throw him to the fire!
We need to evaluate all the talent for next year.
Wait so you didn't see enough from today? I've seen all I need to see from him.
I'm biased because I didn't like the move, I'll admit that. But I've seen enough. The guy did stuff that's never been done post merger. He doesn't even know when to take a sack. Doing it once, I'm just talking about lofting up the ball for an interception, ok I get that, you can do that once in a game. Especially if you are panicking about taking a safety. But doing that one mistake twice in addition to all the others. I can't tell if he just has bad judgment, or the games too fast for him. Take the sack. He's awful, he's the worst QB they've trotted out since Hobart. Actually he's the worst. He is the worst, it's that simple.
Then the talk about we don't have losses we just have lessons post game ****. Is McDermott really peddling this participation trophy stuff? Someone needs to tell the both of them that they lost and they were horrendous. These are grown men. Clearly I could ramble on more, it's just nuts
-
8 hours ago, Bob in STL said:
to soon to tell.
Lynn has a Pro Bowl QB and a fine young defense.
McCoach has McCoy and that is all.
And whose fault is that?
This game is proof of why you take players over coaches. It's easy to change coaches. Accruing talent takes a lot more time and effort, and the players usually have more longevity than a coach.
-
33 minutes ago, BadLandsMeanie said:
I agree with you. And I think in time his having put Peterman in for a half won't seem like as a big of a deal to anyone but Peterman. And I hope he gets past it too.
No, this game is going to always be remembered pretty vividly. Even if McDermott turns it around and has a good run.
Peterman was record setting bad. It's delusional to think everyone will just forget about it.
Maybe I'm missing out on some kind of sarcasm or something here. I don't know.
-
3 hours ago, joesixpack said:
Do you know how long bill cowher was coach in Pittsburgh? As a corollary how long did he stick around before he won a super bowl?
that guy survived multiple seasons with kordell Stewart as qb ffs. That stability in the face of adversity is why they are who they are.
They were consistently in the playoffs. Kordell Stewart went 11-5 one year. The hell are you talking about? That comparison makes 0 sense.
-
41 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:
Whose*
You added so much to the conversation. Seriously man, what's your point with that?
-
The guy is chip kelly 2.0
He's actually chip kelly on steroids. Kelly made the playoffs and then ran all the talent out of town.
This guy was like eff playoffs, I'm trading away two top 5 picks, and benching my starting qb in half a season. I see you Chip and I raise you one.
I'm done with this guy. I won't root for him to succeed. He's just so unlikable to me. It really sucks, but I can't do it. !@#$ him.
9 minutes ago, GreggTX said:TT may be the best option right now, but I think they've already decided that he's just not good enough so they wanted to see what they had with Peterman before the season ended. I don't disagree with that decision. Who knew the kid would implode like that in his first start? Better days are ahead for young Nate.
But why do it now?
And I agree better days are ahead for Nate, he is gonna be getting that NFL money on the side while working in whatever he majored in at Pitt. He's awful.
-
2
-
-
11 minutes ago, fridge said:
Huh? You inferred a lot there. I'm not the OP, you realize that right?
I don't even know what you mean about rejecting criticism. Impossible to respond to, really.
Sorry, I just took you as the OP since you said you're defending his right to make bold decisions. So yea sorry, I made a lot of inferences because if thats all you can say like what are you even saying?
That's all you add? You don't explain it at all, who are you defending this right for Sean McDermott from that people are clamoring to take it away from him in vain?
Edit- still think most of the post holds up given what you said.
Tyrod to start vs Chiefs
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Sorry but if it makes some people uncomfortable maybe that's because somewhere they think their might be truth to it.
I don't think this applies to the coaching staff at all, but the fans... it's questionable.
Just my opinion, and I'm not trying to insinuate that the guy I originally quoted is one of them. The joke just came to mind there.