-
Posts
14,246 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BuffaloBillyG
-
-
Pats...sure. Monday night...
-
2
-
1
-
4
-
-
48 minutes ago, atlbillsfan1975 said:
How much are they paying him to do that dance?
I was under the impression Steve paid THEM to dance that way🤷🏻♂️
-
1
-
1
-
-
If Scott Chandler is the "Legend of the Shovel" leading the charge, I'm in.
-
3
-
2
-
-
34 minutes ago, Process said:
Hopefully diggs hits those incentives so he can afford to buy a truck or SUV. What is he thinking lmao. Time to store that thing for the winter.
Tasker like : We're on it
-
1
-
6
-
-
48 minutes ago, Greg S said:
Coming into this game Jets GM Joe Douglas teams are 0-11 vs the AFCE.
So, extend him?
-
2
-
-
-
1 hour ago, badassgixxer05 said:
Or the fact that a franchise guy that spent his whole career with a team and with his QB that was also drafted there wanted out. Don't know how much clearer it can get. Things aren't good there. Demanding trade is a little better then quitting though. ill give Julio that.
So...more speculation trying to be passed as fact. Got it. Thanks.
-
7 minutes ago, Builder Bill said:
He was close with julio. Last year he sat back and watched him get his way and atl had to make that trade to Nashville. Something is toxic in that reciever room
Again, based off what? Pure 100% speculation. People out here writing fan fiction.
-
The least few weeks especially these 2 have been lights out. Amazing how well they both have played once they received a higher percentage of the snap count. Hoping it continues after they both get a nice payday...and neither one of these guys strike me as a Dareus type.
Big Ed just has that crazy guy energy. Last week the way Phillips played....well it reminded me of this fella that wore 95 for us a few years back. And just in time for the playoffs!
-
4
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Buffalo03 said:
He apparently took time off because of his mental health but it looks like he might not want to play for Atlanta anymore
Based off...what exactly? Some random dude on Twitter twitting a tweet?
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, HardyBoy said:
Buffalo don't even live in North America....
So, the fraudulent behavior exists on a much larger scale then I first thought. Interesting.....
-
They could have brought it here if we had a dome. And enough hotels. And and extra Dave and Busters.
So build a Dome and put a Dave and Busters in it.
-
7
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
2 minutes ago, cba fan said:
Bison is the logo not the city name.
The historical range of 1800 American Bison extends up into the southtowns regions. It can be surmised some bisons roamed in Orchard Park and likely some strays ventured into what is now Buffalo city limits proper.
Older range reaserch shows range covered complete Buffalo area.
Be that as it may, but I guarantee NONE of those bison paid their Bills. Fraud.
-
2
-
-
The only thing I want in a new stadium is a Super Bowl Champions banner. I would prefer to see this Bills win it...but if not maybe some of us could go to Foxboro and steal some of theirs.
-
Well, I went to a Bills game and there was no live Buffalo anywhere roaming the city. I believe Tre White TRIED to address this a couple years back. To me that screams that they had knowledge of the fraud and continue to mislead. I'm suing for 2.5 billion dollars, a stadium with a dome, and insist that Patrick Mahomes gets deported (along with his sideshow circus family) to Sweden.
-
5
-
1
-
-
34 minutes ago, Huh? What? said:
If I wore panties... they'd be in bunch right now... although there's nothing wrong with panties in bunch...
Username is accurate.
-
24 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said:
Dont under-estimate the Cinci-Cleveland rivalry for Ohio.
Yes, big deal...for the fans. You really think that for the most part players care about "rivalry games"? After the game there will be jersey swaps, photos take, players catching up with opponents. This isn't college anymore.
Never would have seen Thurman and Bryan Cox swapping jerseys. Times change.
18 minutes ago, ngbills said:Some truth to this but there is also the match up thing. We may be able to beat every team in the playoffs except IND due to the bad match up. So say we avoid IND in round 1 and they lose to CIN. We then beat NE, TEN and KC/CIN to go to the super bowl. But if we play IND round 1 we are one and out. That is not unrealistic.
No, I agree...a matchup thing. Some may be better than others, for sure. But if you are a team that will rely on matchups to win in the post season....you don't deserve the Super Bowl...JMO
-
1 minute ago, ngbills said:
CIN still beats this CLE team most likely. They have already packed it in.
I think I prefer 4 over 3 anyway. Do we want to play NE and then @TEN, or IND and then @KC? The NE and TEN route seems like the preferred road to me.
My opinion: If you have to hem and haw about what teams we face where and when...we aren't as good as we think.
Set em up and knock em down. Not a team in the playoffs to fear.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Motorin' said:
Case Keenum > Baker Mayfield
Neither were good this year.
But Cleveland is just ready to end a miserable letdown of a season. Pretty sure they will just be going through the motions.
-
So, build the dome?
-
2
-
-
Mayfield is out too. Cleveland looked like they were loading the U-Hauls against the Steelers at the end. I don't think this mayters as much as we hope.
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:
He quantifiably plays better on the road, and there hasn't been a "home field advantage" in the NFL for 3 seasons now---using math.
But you still gotta have that home field game, huh?I'd be stunned if Denver beats KC, but it could happen. This is the NFL.
Don't count on it.
I'm honestly not caught up in seeding. It's more about who we would get as our game partner--who would we match up with--that's way more important than raw seeding number.
I want to see us get Raiders or New England, at least in the first game.
We are going to have to go through KC at some point anyway!
Josh Allen Playoff record:
2-0 at home
0-2 on the road
Because math isn't the only answer.
-
4
-
1
-
-
If this week plays out certain ways than it could be the Colts or Pats heading to Arrowhead. A case could be made for either to pull that upset.
Bengals are streaking right now, but have been up and down much of the year on a week to week basis. Even in the 4 slot we could host 2 games.
7 minutes ago, Logic said:I think it's more likely we get the #3 seed.
Mixon and a host of other Bengals are on the COVID list, and while I still think they'll beat the Browns, it at least seems reasonable to me that they could lose in an upset. If they lose and the Bills win, Bills are #3 seed.
If that happens, I believe our most likely opponent in round 1 would be the Colts, not the Patriots. Pick your poison, I guess.
Unless the Raiders and Patriots win. I believe Raiders hit the 6 seed then.
-
2
-


Falcons DC Dean Pees calls young NFL coaches “entitled” and “spoiled”
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
Spot on about analytics. They can be a helpful tool to incorporate, for sure.
But they cannot factor in specific events in what is happening to a team currently in the field. Way too many variables to be relied on 100%. A computer can't look a guy in the eye and say "He wants this more than normal. I trust him".