Jump to content

delirious

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    843

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by delirious

    Bills OTAs

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted · Edited by delirious

    11 hours ago, StHustle said:

     

    Yeah cause every team has all pro safeties on their roster. He is top 5 in his position but not paid as such. Tired of people crying like the NFL is making billions off these guys talents. He deserves his fair share and it reasonable for him to not show up for voluntary practices when he feels he's underpaid. Stop being selfish and only caring about the team and their success like these aren't real humans playing.


    I frankly don't get either sides of the argument.  Yeah the practices are voluntary, but it's not like the Bills were forcing Poyer to sign the contracts he did.  So Poyer can be upset all he wants, he is suffering the consequences of his own actions by signing the contracts that he did (and that he is still under).  

    We'll see what happens when the attendance becomes mandatory.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Eyeroll 1

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    More guns = better. Obviously not from a crime perspective, but from a freedom and anti-authority perspective, and self-preservation perspective.

     

    Why does the state get to hold a monopoly on force? I don't need to roll out all of the states throughout history that have abused that monopoly and made aggression towards people legal, just or not. I'd rather deal with the consequences of having guns exist than give it up and have no defence whatsoever against an abusive state.

     

    Secondly, crime is always going to exist, and abolition never works. Drugs, sex, porn, abortion, the list goes on. Guns wouldn't be any different.

     

    The slippery slope of this is tremendous. Okay, less guns, what's next? No knives? No forks? No tridents? When does this lunacy end? 

     

    It's disappointing foolish people throughout history have willingly given up their rights for non-existent promised security. It's a tragic comedy. 

    • Thank you (+1) 3

    Can we talk about Tremaine Edmunds?

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Yantha said:

    Guys....  with respect.....  considering some of the snide responses here, I'm guessing that if I bumped an old thread, I'd get equally lambasted for doing so.  If you don't want to discuss T.E., then please just stop posting your responses.  Nothing is forcing you to.

     

    Move along to a discussion you are interested in.  Just a suggestion.

     

    The wheels are already in motion, bud. All you can do is buckle up and hang on 😎

    • Agree 1
    • Haha (+1) 3

    Can we talk about Tremaine Edmunds?

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, Florida Bills Fanatic said:

    Whenever someone has an alternative that is 6' 5", runs in the 4.5's, and takes away many of the inside passing lanes; we should devote some time to it.  In the absence of that, it will be the same old same old.

     

    He took away all those passing lanes in the KC game as Mahomes targeted him countless times, and made him look like he had his pants down 🤣.

    • Like (+1) 1

    Breece Hall Please!!

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Chicken Boo said:

     

    If RB were so easily replaceable, we'd have a top tier guy.  I'm not too much worried about 2nd contracts.  That's for Beane to figure out.  I want the Bills to win and win now!

     

    This is DK Metcalf all over again.  A handful of us on here banging the table for an obvious talent, while others try to tell us why their game won't translate at the next level.

     

    Breece is going to be a beast for whoever gets him.  

     

    Just because the Bills haven't be successful at easily replacing them in the past recent years doesn't mean that's a global truth. In fact, the Bills have been the outliers compared to other teams getting great running backs outside of the 1st round. 

     

    If Breece turns out good, then ok. I'm gonna be skeptical in the mean time and I certainly will not be pounding the table. 

    • Agree 1

    Breece Hall Please!!

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    7 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

     

    If it weren't for those qualities, Harris wouldn't offer much.  He much slower and less explosive than Hall - AND Breece balance and yac aren't exactly lacking.  

     

    All things equal, I'd take Hall easily.

     

    All things equal, Breece had a lot of open field runs that I don't think will translate to the NFL.  Just my eyes I don't think he's good between the tackles, and busting big runs isn't a thing in the NFL anymore. 

     

    Besides, are you ponying up a second contract for a RB? I sure wouldn't.  So why would I spend a 1st round pick on a position that is easily replaceable?

    Jordan Poyer going into last year of his deal

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Scorp83 said:

    I see another extension coming for him, Poyer & Hyde are McDermott’s people! Like those 2 helped build that entire defensive vision for him, no way he let’s that go right now! He rode Kyle Williams until Kyle was ready to go, I think Poyer & Hyde as well will get that same respect type of treatment. I just think right now, they can’t give him an extension, gotta let some of these 1 year deals falls off after this year & get some of that money rolling back into the cap. 

     

    As of right now, with that logic, then the Bills would have rode Jerry Hughes til he was ready to go and yet here we are with him sitting in FA.

×
×
  • Create New...