delirious
-
Posts
843 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by delirious
-
-
Just now, VaMilBill said:
That play was on Dobson
Edmunds have been less than average every year, but he's even lesser than average tonight.
-
2
-
-
Edmunds is SO WORTHLESS. Below average linebacker in the league.
The mental gymnastics the fans make for this guy is mind boggling
-
Just now, 716er said:
Tremaine oughta give us a discount after this game
Please no. I want him off this team.
-
I hope they continue this series. I really want to see TKO and London Fletcher highlighted. They were some bright spots during the drought years as well.
-
1 minute ago, Breakout Squad said:
As to #3, how realistic is it that a 5th round pick would’ve made an impact. It’s possible but despite Fromm not working out, I can’t fault Beane for trying to find a diamond in the rough and/or following their draft board
Sure. Just my opinion. I was sold on Josh, so the thought of potentially getting another Milano type or a good 5th rounder in general (someone who actually gets playing time) vs someone that's gonna be sitting behind josh not getting playing time
-
2
-
-
4 minutes ago, Paup 1995MVP said:
What is there to like about Davis Webb? I never want to see him take the field in a Bills uniform.
Jake Fromm had an excellent college career. Never understood the crap many Bills fans gave him. And if I am a Giants fan I sure as hell hope Jake Fromm has more game then Daniel Jones has. Because Jones' performance last Monday nite against the Bucs was atrocious.
1. Idk because I like Davis Webb.
2. When the media took videos of training camp practices, it was always Allen and Webb having fun racing and joking around.
3. Jake Fromm has a noodle arm, and so does Webb, but I think Davis Webb is smarter (from reports by media in the past)
4. Fromm is JAG and a waste of a 5th round pick that could have been utilized elsewhere imo so I naturally don't like that.
-
2
-
1
-
-
I like Davis Webb more. See yah later, Jake
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, auburnbillsbacker said:
Terrible take.
They were down 2 key defenders versus the Colts and did a good job versus Henry with the exception of 1 run, where 3 Titans were holding our defenders. The rest of the season they stuffed the run.
Terrible take. Easiest schedule playing crap QBs.
-
1 hour ago, klos63 said:
What are your thoughts on a 3 DB alignment? With Neal being one of them,
I'm for trying anything this season.
I think the bigger issue is at least getting a bigger younger 1Tech in the upcoming draft. I personally also like bigger defensive ends, almost 5tech worthy.
-
12 minutes ago, klos63 said:
you think that's a terrible take, it's a fact, but no comment on a 4-4-3 defensive alignment? 3 in the secondary will take away the run, but of course there will be a lot of passing yards surrendered.
It's a fact with no context. It doesn't explain the Bills really easy schedule and it doesn't explain the terrible QBs the Bills have been fortunate to play against.
The reason it's a terrible take is because it was said as if there is no issue at all with the defense.
I've said it elsewhere, what I think can help the run defense get better.
-
33 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said:
It is absolutely hilarious.
And its not you. It is all year long on any of my devices here in Europe, so they are definitely decided that he just doesn't exist lol.
But why? I don't get it. Surely the NFL app and website runners have to know this?
This is just so weird but it drives me up a wall
-
Has anybody noticed when Zach Wilson is playing for the Jets, NFL.com just completely craps the bed and doesn't show his stats? I've never seen this ever but I I noticed it the beginning of the year.
He gets injured so I forget about it. Went to check his stats today on the NFL app and there is no passing statistics.
Is it maybe the NFL app on my.phone?
-
1 minute ago, Gugny said:
They gave up yards to the two best running backs in the NFL. In 11 games, they've given up fewer than 80 yards in eight of them.
Running backs are not as good without offensive lines. See Barkley, Saquon.
1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:Nope. You still didn't say anything at all. Why don't you take a moment and describe to us how and why, in your opinion, they struggled against the Titans and then the Colts - and whether those "struggles" can be fixed and how. Now that would not be a lazy take.
I've said multiple times that the bills have strugged most of the times against mauling type offensive lines.
My opinion on fixing that is bigger 1techs and 3techs.
I specifically wanted Alim McNeil this year in the draft.
-
1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:
And simply saying "they were no-shows" against the Titans and the Colts is a lazy take
It's hyperbole, if you'd like me to use a more descript name, then fine. They struggled. Satisfied?
-
1
-
-
Just now, Gugny said:
It's just easy to say, "the Bills can't run the ball and they can't stop the run." Kind of like it was easy to say, "Josh Allen is inaccurate."
Welcome to www.lazynarratives.com
I'm not saying they can't stop the run. There's nuance, and just throwing up a stat that doesn't accurately reflect a team that historically does bad against big mauling type offensive lines and having the one of the easiest schedules this year is the lazy take.
-
1 hour ago, MJS said:
It's not a terrible take, or a "take" at all. It's the truth. The Bills are top 5 in yards per game and yards per attempt.
And the fans come on here and spout nonsense about having 1 CB on the field or moving our nickel corner to the boundary? It shows a hilarious lack of understanding of how football works.
The Bills also have one of the easiest schedules this year. So I don't put much weight in that. But power to you
4 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:Yeah, no-shows against the Colts. Star and Edmunds. Total no-shows, it was like they weren't even on the field. Oh, wait, they didn't actually play. No wonder they were no-shows.
As for the Titans, they had that one long long run, but except for that one play, which appeared to be greatly due to Hyde taking a bad angle, the Bills were actually pretty decent against the run. Not great, certainly, and you can't just pretend that the big play didn't happen. But you absolutely can say that for most of the game they were not destroyed by the run. They were certainly not no-shows.
Oh right, star and Edmunds are the saviors. We'll just ignore all the other games where big offensive lines dominated us. They help, but in their years on this team, there are more than just a game or two where we've gotten ran all over.
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
43 minutes ago, mikemac2001 said:
Against the top 2 backs this year
dumb
What are backs without a OLine? The Bills historically tend to do bad against big offensive lines that are mauling.
"2 top backs this year" is an excuse.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, MJS said:
The Bills are top 5 against the run already.
Terrible take.
When that stat actually mattered against forealz run heavy teams (Titans and Colts), they were no-shows.
-
3
-
2
-
3
-
1
-
3
-
-
Dawkins is pure dog water holy crap
-
-
Like what they did that drive. Just want them to come away with 7 instead. Glad they at least capitalized on good field position.
-
Not a country music fan in the slightest. But a breath of fresh air vs rap or pop.
-
3
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson said:
If Isaiah 'the muff fumbler' McKenzie trips and fumbles again, Stevenson should be playing.
Stevenson should regardless. I don't like holding my breath every time McKenzie goes to field a punt
-
1
-
-
I hope he gets it just so I can stop seeing these threads pop up every year.
-
2
-
12/6/21 Gameday Thread Bills vs. Pats* 2nd Half Thread
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
Can the Bills booth person get fired? McDermoot has a TERRIBLE challenge record. He's missed stuff even us armchair tv viewers can see!!!
SMFH this person needs gone YESTERDAY!!