Jump to content

delirious

Community Member
  • Posts

    847
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by delirious

  1. 10 minutes ago, JGMcD2 said:

    A lot of posters here were pretty upset when the Dolphins signed Long to a deal for 2/$10M. They felt we should have pursued him… 

    I don’t think we should have pursued him but I was upset that the fish signed him. He was a good LB for the Titans. Off year, bad scheme fit? I don’t know why he dropped off a cliff. 

  2. This is so delightful to keep reading. After all the homers constantly and vociferously telling us he's good.  *Chef's kiss*, I hope this thread continues, not because of Edmunds, but so the Edmunds Truthers can sit there and be reminded about their homerism lol

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Eyeroll 1
    • Agree 3
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  3. 2 minutes ago, FireChans said:

    Edmunds report update:

     

    Baker was terrified to throw across the middle today. He only threw for 317 yards. If the Scarecrow wasn’t there, he might have had 500.

     

    This has been your weekly update, thanks as always for tuning in.

     

    What a STUD! Can't believe he slipped away from the Bills! 🤣🤣

  4. 37 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:

    the posters on TBD tend to skew older. They want a white LB with a mullet and a neck pad, like it was 1995. Edmunds was a modern LB and was hated here because he is a coverage LB and not Shane Conlin.

     

    Most sane Edmunds mental gymnast

    3 minutes ago, Snappysnackcakes said:

    If you’re gonna put nonsense like this out here, at least spell the name correctly. It’s Shane Conlan. And he would do well in today’s NFL. BTW, he never had a mullet. 

    Right? Shane Conlan would have actually been a beast. Unlike Edmunds.

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. 3 hours ago, I am the egg man said:

    Oh yeah? Don’t know what that means, but If it means what I think it does…..you’re eviler.

     

    MWAHAHAHAHAHA! >:]

    54 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

    The Bills need to redo the logo. Both iterations are terrible. Why can't they just do a normal looking aggressive bison?

     

    like the one in this image:

     

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQn3lQAv5mCb6R7MiyYrH9

     

    The current charging buffalo is awesome lol

    • Agree 1
  6. 9 minutes ago, Repulsif said:

    Since we won't change defensive schemes, can we have back at least the red helmet ?

     

    That red helmet Josh wore was MINT. The delusional ones who say it looks ugly are ontologically evil.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Disagree 1
    • Agree 1
  7. Just now, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

    The 1 seed is not something to play with. This defense absolutely sucks. Every time you try and talk about how clueless Fraizer is you get a laundry list of defenders. The guy is a problem and this defense sucks 

     

    The defenders are what's more maddening. Borderline schizos. The evidence is on the screen right in front of their eyes.

  8. Everyone keeps mentioning that it will help Josh see and Tua will be at a disadvantage seeing, which I agree with.  BUT  doesn't that also mean Josh will have a hard time noticing defenders in lanes, and likewise, won't Tua be able to diagnose defenders in lanes easier?

    Just seems like no one really has too much of an advantage over another.  Although, I would much rather my QB have an easier time seeing his receivers than the other team.

    • Like (+1) 3
×
×
  • Create New...