dgrochester55

I like this as a low key signing. Moore showed flashes in his first year with the Jets and was productive a couple of years ago in Cleveland when Flacco was at QB. It would be interesting to see what he can do with an offense that doesn't have a dumpster fire situation at quarterback.

Yes.

A First round pick from last year who was doing okay until he got injured is already beyond hope, but a 4th rd pick who has yet to see an NFL field is the difference between the Super Bowl and another early exit?

A, I do not know enough about the players to criticize or praise them, but the positions filled and the types of players selected to fill them were logically sound. There are some valid arguments about how we could have selected WR, but I feel a lot better about Samuel, Coleman and Palmer that I did about our CB and Defensive line depth before today.

6th round........of the 2026 draft.

Taking what was thought to be a top 5 pick in round 5 is a good risk for Cleveland. This is unprecedented to have someone projected that high fall that far down so quickly. The closest parallel that I could think of was Maurice Clarett about 20 years ago and that was for a more concrete reason.

I always love learning every draft day how the difference between a Super Bowl run and fading into obscurity is solely dependent on which person that everyone already passed over three or more times is selected. Last year, it was because we didn't draft Tony Franklin in round 4.

It remains to be seen how these players work out, but i am glad to see positions of need being filled. Getting someone with high upside like Walker in the 4th is something that I am on board with.

That would be like asking my cat to teach me quantum physics.

Honesty with a late round pick, why not? You can develop him for a couple of years and trade him down the road.

Seven years later from the original post, and democrat politics have gotten worse. Typical online arguing with Dems in 2025. Normal poster: I prefer tart tasting apples to sweeter tasting ones Karen Dunning-Kruger: I don’t like tart apples, what are you an idiot? Normal poster: No, I just prefer the taste Karen Dunning-Kruger: But it says here that more people prefer oranges, what the hell is your problem? Normal Poster: I thought we were talking about apples Karen Dunning-Kruger: Don’t change the subject, oranges with thicker rinds are sweeter! Normal Poster: What does that have to do with this? Karen Dunning-Kruger: Are you a botanist? How dare you question scientific research! Normal Poster: I don’t see what this has to do with apples Karen Dunning-Kruger: Stop gaslighting me!

If Cleveland gets Sanders anyway and the extra picks, they got over huge on this trade.

I would rather see the NFL overhaul their officiating and stop running an obnoxious amount of gambling app ads. Regardless of how much tampering if any is actually going on in the games, those two things combined are a bad look and leave it wide open for people to question them. As far as expanding the playoffs, I haven't seen enough competitiveness from the 7th seeds in the playoffs to make me think that adding an 8th or 9th team would enhance the experience.

I noticed that a large portion of the Climate change narrative faded after they tried to blame the Maui fires on it two years ago and it blew up in their face. Shortly before that, Canadian wildfires covering most of the northeast in smoke were blamed on climate change but we later found out that Canada was grossly undermanned to fight it and allegedly that Trudeau had instructed his firefighters not to battle the fire. In early 2020 before COVID the Australian wildfires pitched as "Indisputable proof of climate change" ended up being at least partially due to arsonists. Not only does this look bad, but it resulted in half or more of the population wanted nothing to do with environmental conservation at all. That is a shame because there are numerous issues with pollution and we should all do our part. If climate change is real and human caused, no one wants anything to do with the current preventative plans because all they saw was virtue signaling, hypocrisy and a giant scheme to give China massive profits. My personal take is that I will take the climate change threat seriously when celebrities and politicians are no longer allowed to fly private jets.

Caring about human rights means that your intentions are at least good. Human rights does not mean absence of consequences. For example, I would have an inherent right to not be assaulted by you, but if I was to break into your house, that changes that and you have a right to defend yourself in that scenario. This person broke the law by coming here and that at the very least beating his wife and driving without a license and likely but allegedly at this point was in MS-13. Any other county would deport someone who entered illegally and committed crimes. Why is the US doing that a sudden violation of human rights? His rights do not allow him a free pass to violate the rights of others. Edit: Since progressives sometimes have trouble comprehending figurative vs literal when reading, let me add that the breaking in to your house sentence was meant as an analogy and not a literal threat.