Governor
-
Posts
3,846 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Governor
-
-
Would an elite edge guy make that happen? Maybe. But it would have to be a Mack type player. I think we need to find out, and quickly.
-
7 hours ago, Nelius said:
Over performing? Never really thought of it that way. If anything I thought Edmunds, Epenesa, Hyde, Zack Moss, Dawson Knox, etc. were underperforming. This team should upgrade anywhere it can (especially at RB) because that's what good teams do but this isn't a team of average players playing above their heads right now. There's a lot of talent.
I really just don’t see it. I think the offense was obviously playing over their heads and the coaching did a great job of hiding the lack of talent on defense. I lived in Carolina all of those years and there’s no resemblance at all.
Who is the Julius Peppers of this defense? Who is the Charles Johnson of this defense? Those D lines were absolutely dominant. We don’t have ANY of those pieces. I would send BOTH of our LB’s packing tomorrow. We aren’t close on defense at all if the model is Carolina.
I think a few posters here recently hit it right on the head. We don’t just need an edge guy. Those Carolina defenses had outstanding pressure and sacks coming from up the middle.
-
1
-
1
-
-
I truly believe this team has been over performing and I’m worried that it won’t last.
We need the best FA DE we can find, draft the best LB available and even trade back up for a RB if need be, and call it a day. I’m also worried about Star.
-
1
-
5
-
1
-
-
We are way lacking in talent. The process can only get you so far. We need 3 or 4 great players added to this team. How?
-
1
-
5
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
Thomas Davis is like 60 years old.
-
Dave Wannstedt made the best adjustments.
-
1
-
-
Buffalo, not SF, rushes for 200 yards and 2 Moss TD’s.
-
Guys, he called a Cover 0 on the last play of the game. It’s kinda obvious what’s going on isn’t it?
-
1
-
-
If you're referring to the Rich case, it was most assuredly not debunked last night.
If you're referring to the Russian meddling/collusion case, it's been suspect for many, many months.
Sorry the Rich story didn't work out for you.
Debunked.
-
Another point in favor of that explanation is that Trump has always insisted the Russia investigation is much ado about nothing. So he either fired Comey because he (Trump) was lying all this time, and thereby impulsively and precipitously exposes his own statements as lies. Or he fired Comey for some other reason, impulsively and precipitously...and not realizing that it would make his previous statements look like lies. Which, either way...five-alarm moron.
And another reminder...not eight hours before Comey was fired, Congressional Democrats were calling for his head because of the discrepancies in Comey "misled" the Senate Judiciary Committee with his testimony, which required written "clarification" from the FBI. HOW !@#$ING EASY would it have been to wait a couple of days and ask Comey to resign for his mishandling of the Clinton case as evidenced by his clearly inconsistent testimony. Get what you want, get a politcal win by giving Senate Democrats what they want, insulate yourself from any blowback by indirectly engaging Senate Democrats in the decision. But no...let's just poke the situation with a sharp stick, and make Comey the anti-Trump hero to people who not eight hours earlier wanted him drawn and quartered as a pro-Trump stooge.
It's actually pretty hard to be that stupid accidentally. You almost have to put some effort into it.
Apparently It was Kushner's call which surprised me. They aren't very bright. It also was Ivanka and Kushner that insisted on promoting Flynn when everyone knew the FBI had him dead to rights.
This is a family that doesn't believe they have to follow the law. Laws are for the peasants.
-
He wants subpoenas and public hearings. It's very obvious what's he's doing. This isn't the only memo. More will come out.
His memos aren't a "smoking gun" without him being fired first, which he was expecting from the start.
The two events together are what makes this so bad.
-
Lol. At least you're fun. The rest of this place is a factory of sadness.
-
Gotta hand it to you. Ever since lyrbob left we've been lacking his special brand of ignorance coupled with pre pubescent snark. You make a very adequate replacement.
I'm just here for the salty tears. Can you show me where I could find some?
-
What if Trump leaves on this foreign trip and never comes back. He just flies to Moscow and lives with Putin or something
From the looks of it, that trip might be cancelled. Trump doesn't have the "energy" to go. Guy is low energy.
-
So, to put this in context:
The Seth Rich report today revealed he shared 44 thousand DNC emails with WikiLeaks' most known middle man - a man who is no longer with us.
The DNC denied the FBI access to their servers during the investigation - something that never made sense... until now. The FBI has/had Rich's laptop in their possession, which the DNC was aware of at the time. Had they let the FBI examine their servers, the FBI could have then tied the emails on Rich's laptop directly to the server, thus proving he was the leaker.
This would, of course, blow the entire "Russia hacked the DNC" narrative out of the water. People who want to make the Rich case into something less than it is, or who wish to ignore it completely, are exposing their bias. The Rich case is central to this entire Russian investigation.
The Russian / Trump story being pushed today is designed to distract you from this information.
It was all debunked last night.
His name was Seth Rich.
Putin came out to save Trump's presidency. That should buy him some time right?
-
So his private memorandum content gets leaked and virtually the entire media, the left and some on the right are running with the story that Trump committed obstruction of justice and you fall back on this schit?
Comey hasn't said a word about any of it. You worried?
-
Why would he? Comey ignored the evidence and cleared her.
What about Hillary?
Will you tell me about Seth Rich?
-
Looks like Comey is !@#$ed or really !@#$ed:
Here is what we do know.
Under the law, Comey is required to immediately inform the Department of Justice of any attempt to obstruct justice by any person, even the President of the United States. Failure to do so would result in criminal charges against Comey. (18 USC 4 and 28 USC 1361) He would also, upon sufficient proof, lose his license to practice law.
So, if Comey believed Trump attempted to obstruct justice, did he comply with the law by reporting it to the DOJ? If not, it calls into question whether the events occurred as the Times reported it.
Obstruction requires whats called specific intent to interfere with a criminal case. If Comey concluded, however, that Trumps language was vague, ambiguous or elliptical, then he has no duty under the law to report it because it does not rise to the level of specific intent. Thus, no crime.
There is no evidence Comey ever alerted officials at the Justice Department, as he is duty-bound to do. Surely if he had, that incriminating information would have made its way to the public either by an indictment or, more likely, an investigation that could hardly be kept confidential in the intervening months.
Comeys memo is being treated as a smoking gun only because the media and Democrats, likely prompted by Comey himself, are now peddling it that way.
Comey will soon testify before Congress about this and other matters. His memo will likely be produced pursuant to a subpoena. The words and the context will matter.
But by writing a memo, Comey has put himself in a box. If he now accuses the President of obstruction, he places himself in legal jeopardy for failing to promptly and properly report it. If he says it was merely an uncomfortable conversation, he clears the president of wrongdoing and sullies his own image as a guy who attempted to smear the man who fired him.
Either way, James Comey comes out a loser. No matter. The media will hail him a hero.
After all, he gave them a good story that was better than the truth.
Now that's silly.
I don't recall Comey accusing Trump of "obstruction of justice" do you?
Anyone?
I think that would be for Congress to decide.
-
If Trump can't change this news cycle in the next 4-5 days he's finished. Republican donors are walking away. The market is tanking.
He's going to resign.
-
He's trying to do his !@#$ing job and no matter what he does the MSM and the left hound him. We're dealing with pure hypocrisy. When an ACLU attorney can admit in court that Trump's travel ban would have been ok if only Hillary had issued it and when dumb schit Maxine Walters can say that Comey's firing was bad because Trump did it, but would have been ok if Hillary had then even you libs should feel ashamed.
Whatabouthillary?
False equivalencys!
Kellyanne, is that you?
-
Impeachment is not about public opinion. It requires conviction (to be found guilty) of bribery, treason, or high crimes and misdemeanors. Public opinion has squat to do with it. If it worked that way, no president in my lifetime would have served a full single term.
It has everything to do with it. They pick from a list of crimes, that he easily created for them, and they just move forward.
It's over Boss.
Look at the Republican shift just in the last 5 days. What do you think it will look like a week from now? This is already in motion.
-
He technically did enough just in his first week to be impeached. He still hasn't divested. Impeachment is more about public opinion, which crime they throw at you doesn't really matter. They, or really the public, decides if it's serious enough. If they public demands it, they'll impeach him for a petty crime.Well...except given that you actually have to commit a crime to be impeached.
And Trump hasn't even done that much yet. Being a simpering orange retard isn't a crime.
Not really. It doesn't tell me anything that I didn't already know.
-
Is anyone here concerned that the President asked the FBI director for loyalty at a private dinner, and then this morning threatened him with tapes of their conversations? Or are we hand waving this away with some reference to something a Democrat did in 2009?
It's just your classic deflection, whataboutisms, and false equivalencys. I was hoping this board wasn't infected with Russian trolls but apparently not.
-
The fake media is being mean to me. No fair!
Free Agents We Should Be Looking At
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
I really don’t know. Would adding an elite DE tell us everything else we need to know about the others? I sure hope so.
I also hope the model is different because if Beane thought Singleterry and Miss were going to be the next DeAngelo Williams/Jonathon Stewart 1-2 punch, he missed by a mile on that one. I don’t know what’s going on there but it isn’t funny anymore.