Figster

I get having a difference of opinion on this subject , what I don't get is the need for insults.

Taylor has a winning record in the NFL after two seasons and given a starters salary to continue playing for Buffalo. While I believe the Bills may have hit the jackpot in Peterman its refreshing to see the loyalty returned to Taylor who has proven his loyalty to his team. I respect the decision. Myself personally, still a big T T fan, fan of the whole 53 man roster which includes Nathan Peterman. I'm an even bigger fan of the team...

Here, let me help you

I explained my position on the topic once and you gave me a thumbs up by way of acknowledgment so go figure. Is your memory that bad?

I've replied out of courtesy, not because you're adding anything to a discussioon...

You called me a flip flopper and I already agreed so what are you looking to accomplish here.

Curious, do you take sides to an argument? I think I've explained my position on this topic well...

this is what it boils down to and If a small hanful of preseason games is already casting doubt over a veteran QB, Hello...

It accomplishes nothing by way of evaluating the QB That has a much better chance of being in Buffalo's long term future. Normally I would agree with you grb, but Peterman's not your average bear IMO. with all due respect sir I mean seriously, Peterman has played the way I had hoped Tyrod could play.

Peterman has played the way you would expect a veteran starting NFL QB to play while learning a new system/players in my humble opinion.

To me its almost like instant replay, do we see enough to overturn the decision. In my opinion we do and perhaps Dennison and McD feel the same way, but it makes no sense telegraphing that line of thinking to the opposition not just for this Sunday, next Sunday as well in my humble opinion bandit.

I think the Bills brain thrust understands by now T T doesn't perform that well in the pocket and the regular season gameplan with T Mobile behind center will focus more on what Taylor does well in my humble opinion.

After careful consideration grooming the rookie Peterman the way you might a higher draft choice is acceptable to me under the circumstances AFL. My preference is still to play Peterman...

sure, why not...

Its possible Peterman could start game one and have T T ready by game 2 IMO.

As do I

WCO spreads the field horizontally and concentrates on a 15 yard area off the line of scrimmage so to stop Petermans short game is to stop the Dennison O in my humble opinion.

decisive split second read, react and make highly accurate throws is what Peterman does best and there is no taken that away or they would have stopped tom brady years ago in my humble opinion.

I've become a big fan of the new regime

QB's fit different systems and it should come as no surprise Taylor's ability to run fits well in a run heavy G Roman O.

Sully just doesn't understand...

The holy Trent lives on in all of us... ...ok...some of us...

What does that have to do with the normal procedure they would follow until a change is made?

You make a good point because the play makers on your football team want the football.

hahaha, I 've got to 2nd that, funny stuff