Roundybout

Pacers really falling apart that quarter, it felt like they pushed way too much at the end.

Guy was playing with fire by going out there with that calf strain. You absolutely hate to see it

Sure man. Holding consistent principles must be a foreign concept to you

Like you lit the fuse, you think it's fictional? Mystical? Maybe, spiritual hero Who appears in you to clear your view when you're too crazy? Lifeless to those, the definition for what life is Priceless to you, because I put you on the hype ***** You like it? Gun smokin', righteous with one toke Get psychic among those, possess you with one dose

Great post. And think that’s why this proposal is hated by both the left and right.

Let’s keep it that way. I’m opposed to sprawl. It’s bad development and bad urbanism.

I agree with this and it's frustrating that Dem leadership sticks with this line instead of focusing on Trump's lie about no new wars.

Yes. Here is a study from Headwaters Economics, a research firm in Montana. https://headwaterseconomics.org/public-lands/wildfire-public-land-housing/ "Less than 2% of the 181 million acres of Forest Service operational and Department of Interior land included this analysis are close enough to towns with housing needs to be practical for development—around 2.4 million acres. Most of this land is concentrated in a handful of western states—primarily Nevada, Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Utah—and the vast majority of the land is managed by DOI. Forest Service lands offer even fewer options, with only three states (Arizona, Utah, and Oregon) having more than 5,000 acres near towns." Developing housing on public lands may offer benefits in a limited number of communities, but it is not a broad solution. While access to low-cost land can help, housing affordability depends on a complex set of factors—such as construction and labor costs, financing availability and interest rates, insurance access and affordability, and proximity to jobs. In addition, hyperlocal constraints like water supply and community opposition can further restrict feasibility. Beyond this, I don't want our pristine and beautiful natural lands to be taken over for suburban sprawl. It's unsustainable development. Housing policy should be focused on upzoning existing municipal lands and reusing underdeveloped sites, instead of paving over new ones.

Sure. I think he was a practice squad guy during the offseason. Anyone remember A.J. Tarpley?

When did I defend Iran? Please be specific.

The land the federal government owns in the west is pristine and also not developable. Leave it be.

So, it IS a war then? Good to know.

I love the little tough guy faces they’re trying to make. Vance looks like he just let out a wet fart and is trying to hold it in.

What is stopping Iran from a) simply purchasing a nuke or b) restarting the development at other sites?

Management? What?

So he was never about peace, as I said the entire campaign cycle. Thank you!

No new wars. That’s what he ran on. It was a lie. Just admit it!

I think it’s a rather big deal that he flat lied about one of his big campaign selling points, don’t you?

Weird definition of “peace”

This isn’t the point. The point is that Trump ran on being anti-war. His fan base ate it up, as below: It was a lie. You were all fooled.

Unfortunately you’re right. Strikes like this are red meat for respondents. Boots on the ground, on the other hand…

And again, this just shows how much the “president of peace” line was complete nonsense. If Iran had a nuke, they’d be parading it through the streets. Someone’s intel would have figured it out - ours, UK, Israel, etc.

They didn’t attack us. Why are we attacking them? I don’t care about Israel. America First.