Buffalo716
-
Posts
21,011 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Buffalo716
-
-
12 minutes ago, Limeaid said:
The show is actually about his wife. He is a guest star.
Of course , everybody needs a sidekick ?
-
Just now, Shotgunner said:
That article says he's famous in the show for being indifferent and unmotivated.
Sounds just like his football career.
Exxxactlyyyy lol
he would Be perfect for Jersey Shore
-
Some memorable quotes...
so Jay, have you thought about what kinda work you want to do now that your retired from football?
Jay-“ Yea, not at all... that is like the exact opposite of what I’m trying to do right now, exact opposite “
What have you been doing recently?
Jay-“ Not much, I like to keep myself very free”
Got a pretty good lookin wife though I will give him that!
-
2
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Magox said:
This makes absolutely 0 sense. If Peterman wins the job it's because he won the job. No hidden meaning, no ulterior motive, no nefarious plot it simply means he won the job and that is the QB they felt gave them the best chance at winning that particular game. If he stinks it up, then they will move on to McCarron or Allen.
If they start him and he stinks it up then it was a bad decision
If they start him I pray he’s good
-
17 minutes ago, eball said:
Man, I appreciated Fred's effort as a Buffalo Bill as much as anyone but people sure do like worshiping "decent" players on bad teams. Aside from 2011, when Fred was off to an awesome start until he got hurt, he had "nice" statistics but nothing that jumps out at you. Really hard worker, great guy, and some memorable moments as a Bill, but certainly never an "elite" RB in the NFL.
He overcame pretty ridiculous odds to fashion a 9-year NFL career and should be commended for that. He doesn't belong in the NFL in 2018 and to suggest he's "better" right now, at age 37, than RBs on NFL rosters is a bit silly. Could he suit up, carry the ball a few times, and catch a few passes? Sure, but not at the expense of younger players with more potential.
When someone starts clamoring for Fred to be on the Bills' wall of fame, my eyes will really start rolling.
He led the NFL in all purpose yards before.. don’t let just rushing yards make your opinion of him
he was one of the best if not best blocking back among his peers... he was a kick returner / punt returner for us at 1 point
a slot receiver and a 3 down back
He was the star of the offense and the league knows how good Fred was
-
9 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:
He's played 5 games in which he threw 6 TD and 2 INT, was remarkably consistent at mid-60s completion, and passed for between 160-280 ypg (average 209).
He kept the team in every game, broke even on W-L during the regular season, and came durn close to winning the playoff game.
Unless he comes on in a big way, he's not a starter, but established veteran, I'd agree. He has demonstrated that he can handle an NFL-speed game competently.
It's possible Peterman may develop and show he is better, but to date, he is far from having shown he can play competently during a regular season game. He is rockin' 49% completions, 2 TD to 5 INT, under 10 completions per game in his 2 starts, and under 50 ypg in his 2 starts. I grant that both his starts were in remarkably challenging circumstances, but until he generates better, data are data. And he did some dumb sh*t - headfirst dive etc.
I see it a little differently - no inside gouge of course - Rico Dennison benched a stagnant Peyton Manning for Brock Osweiler at precisely the same point in the Bronc's superbowl season. At the time, Manning was injured, yes, but also struggling to execute Kubiak/Dennison's offense the way he wanted it executed. Hard to argue Osweiler is a better QB even than the injured embers of Peyton Manning. It was like "listen up, I'm the boss, and you do what I say or I'll sit your butt".
I think Dennison sold the Peterman start because Taylor simply wasn't executing what he was told to do on offense, and he felt that Lynn (from coaching him) had Taylor's number and would shut him down hard. I don't think he thought it would play out as it did (take the heart out of the team, lead them to play like they were sleepwalking), but then, I don't think much of Dennison's abilities as a coach for not knowing that.That was my fathers take as well that it was Dennison and I can see that 100%
Dennison never tried to play to TT strengths for sustained periods and wanted a QB willing to push the ball
-
Just now, Commonsense said:
I don’t think highly of Nate or AJM but I trust McD and their decision making enough that whoever starts is the best option.
They had the balls to sit Taylor in hopes of improving the passing game. That’s a guy desperate to win, he isn’t starting a lesser QB so he can get a better pick.
But he did start a lesser QB vs the chargers because he was desperate... I wanted to see how it played out because we were getting stagnant on offense
BUT
nobody could say that going into that game that Peterman was a better QB than TT , technically a pro bowl QB
Mcdermott took a gamble to spark a fire because he was desperate to win, and he started a worse QB who just wasn’t afraid to throw
-
5 minutes ago, Commonsense said:
So by your logic all backups can possibly become starters and earn big contracts unless your Nate Peterman, Nate = tank? Right?
AJM has played very few NFL snaps, he got the lowest contract offer of any of the available QBs on the FA market. I just don’t see the big disparity in talent, both guys are underwhelming. Only thing that matters to me is that Josh Allen knocks over these pawns before week 3 of the preseason.
Again I never said I think Mccarron is the answer. I said in my opinion he is more ready and better than Peterman...
the NFL is a different animal, where you are drafted is meaningless once you step on the field
its all about heart and work ethic... whoever has that can be a success...
of course backup QBs can work hard and earn success and become starters, but it’s very hard, of course Peterman can too, but I personally don’t have faith
i want Allen to win the job outright in camp and Pre season because he oozes talent that neither have
Allen can be our Cam, Big, Ben
-
15 minutes ago, Commonsense said:
Do we really need to list long term back up QBs who are absolutely terrible? Or are you just having fun? Peterman was horrible, I never liked the pick, I still don’t see how it’s far fetched that he ends up being similar or better than another subpar prospect.
Horrible by your standards or NFL? No NFL player is horrible(untalented) let alone a #2 QB... just not as good as their peers
if you are a 10 year backup QB, you will be called horrible for 10 years... but that’s not the truth
im not talking a backup who stick for 2 seasons... by all accounts Mccarron is going to be a 8-10 year veteran, already going on year 5... that’s far from horrible for an NFL player
he isnt a top QB, he’s a backup... he can become a Keenum, Mccown type in a good system possibly ... I always thought Keenum was pretty good as well and people said he was horrible as well
All backups are backups for a reason
-
Just now, Commonsense said:
AJ/Peterman were both drafted in the 5th round, neither had high hopes of being a starter in the NFL. AJ has thrown for 920 yards and 6 touchdowns, far from established. AJ has sucked less than Peterman but I don’t see this group wanting to tank and I don’t see either one of these QBs being the difference maker.
Established backup.
You don’t stick as a backup for 5 years if your bad, especially as primary
TT was less established than McCarron when we got him...
i never said Mccarron is good or anything, I said he has to be better than Peterman
-
5 minutes ago, MJS said:
You think McCarron is an established veteran? He's played like 5 games in the league.
He is a established backup veteran by NFl standards. He has been a backup for years
TT was an established backup Vet when we signed him too, an NFL veteran... and Mccarron has more playing time
-
If Peterman wins the job they are legitimately trying for a top pick.
McCarron is an established backup veteran and should be better than Peterman. At least good enough to win 4-8 games
I don’t see Peterman winning 4 games...
If they want to protect Josh because they think we don’t have the pieces around him then they are going to sacrifice Peterman to the football gods
and try and draft Nicki Bicpes aka Nick Bosa
13 minutes ago, Homey D. Clown said:I wouldn't be surprised in the least, nor would I be entirely disappointed either. If they want Josh Allen to succeed, the Bills will need him to grow into a starting role, and Peterman looked good at times, better than what they have passed off to fans as a starting QB over the last decade anyway...
What actual starter have we trotted out over the past 10 years that was as bad statistically as Peterman?
not TT,not Orton, not even EJ or Jeff Tuel who was undrafted
even Thad Lewis won us 2 games with more TDs than picks
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Freddie's Dead said:
He'll still be better than the last RB on our final roster. GO FredEX!
I’d wager he is better than alot of backs still
Probably better than Cadet
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:
Light. As in prancing around. It's a definate trait.
Gotcha... skip to my loo kinda person
-
2 hours ago, ExiledInIllinois said:
My nephew is gay. For starters, he is a "little light in his loafers." Not that there is anything wrong with that... But maybe that is what the other poster was getting @. Gronk was jumping around out there.
Now... The question really should be: "What does normal look like?" Definitely NOT me and totally NOT Gronk!
But I get your point of: so what...
That phrase really never made sense to me lol loafers are shoes so they are light in the shoes? Lol
somebodies actual weight should have no barring on sexuality lol so it’s a phrase I always heard but doesn’t make much sense to me
-
Fred Jackson , one of my favorite and a lot of peoples favorite Bills from the last 20 years refuses to quit
Still going strong in the AFFL(American flag football league) Fred just scored 2 TDs to help his team beat Michael Vick’s Squad
Fred is a great football player and an even better person and I’m glad he as always represented Buffalo with class and pride
Miss ya Freddie
-
3
-
2
-
-
3 minutes ago, #34fan said:
STUD.
-Can't wait to watch more of him this year.
He was uncoverable in the MAC last year
and I’m sure he will take it to the next level this season... I’m talking Corey Davis type explosion
He could win the biletnikoff
-
2 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:
...."rumblin', bumblin’, stumblin', mumblin', grumblin'.....NEVER to be worn out.....
Sincerely,
Chris Berman
-
-
15 minutes ago, The Process said:
Here's one:
"They are going tempo" - Used when a team goes no-huddle. Did anyone ever tell the announcers that tempo by definition can be slow, medium or fast?
Any others? ....
I usually hear them say going “up tempo”...
meaning sped up
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Your Brown Eye said:
Oj at 10 is too low, Barry Sanders at 7 is too low. Both should/could be top 5. Bo Jackson played 3 seasons averaged less than a 1000 yards per season and is #4?
I didn’t even get that far lmao
He really has Bo #4?
he was a freak but shouldn’t even be on the list because of lack of longevity
-
1
-
-
Thurman comes in at number 16
A little to low in my opinion...
Id have him closer to 10-12...
He was the best ALL AROUND back from his era. His versatility including his receiving and blocking skills were unmatched
-
20 hours ago, wppete said:
Smooth WR. Anyone know how fast he runs?
He reminded me a little of Charles Clay.
No official times...
im around UB football but I haven’t caught him running a 40
id guess 4.45 (fast end) 4.52 ( slow end )
he is very smooth
-
She’s been liking meek mills photos and vice versa ??
Watch out Poyer ?
Some comedy to lighten the mood
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted