-
Posts
21,996 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by HappyDays
-
-
27 minutes ago, Roundybout said:
Beane presser now. Says they never tried to move up. Ben Allbright says they did. Someone’s lying
I just finished listening to it. Everything he said makes sense and echoes what I said earlier in the thread.
He basically admitted their 1st round grades were wiped out by the time it got to their pick. He said he never wanted to give up #60 in a trade up so that limited the trade up options. So once the 1st round grades were gone he started taking calls to move back.
On trading with KC specifically - he pushed back on the notion that we gave KC the player they wanted. Said they could have just traded up with the next team down, or maybe their player gets to their original pick anyways. He said in those discussions he's just making the best decision for the Buffalo Bills, not worrying about the team he's talking to. Mentioned that he's even had those conversations with our division rivals.
He said he had other offers to move even further back into the 40s or 50s from #28 but didn't want to go back too far. He planned on picking at #32 but getting to move up 59 spots on day three to move back one spot was too enticing to turn down.
Also he didn't exactly come out and say it but he somewhat implied that the added draft value he got could be used to move up on the board again tomorrow. I won't be surprised at all if we pick at say #33 and #50, giving up our 4th perhaps to make it happen.
Beane still has to be right about the players he drafts tomorrow. But his execution tonight makes a ton of sense. He explained himself well.
- 3
- 4
-
2 minutes ago, Beast said:
Tonight was so unlike Beane.
It's actually just like him. What he showed us tonight is that his 1st round grade draft board dried up quickly. In 2022 he traded down multiple times in the 2nd round until finally taking Cook, because his 2nd round grades were wiped out. Beane is very consistent. He will trade up if value plus need match up. He will stay put if he has multiple players in the same tier that match the draft round. He will trade back if he has no players on his board valued in the current round.
Most evaluators see this large group of 8-10 WRs after the top three as 2nd round talents. Beane clearly agrees. So he wasn't going to reach up his board in the 1st. He got some value back and now can take those players in their proper round.
I'm pleased Beane showed some restraint. He is learning.
****Major asterisk that if he does something stupid like take Dejean at #33 I will revoke everything positive I've said about his strategy in this thread.
- 5
- 2
- 2
-
Just now, Roundybout said:
It’s more that you allowed your hated conference rival and defending champion to get THEIR guy.Right but if we weren't taking Worthy, I highly doubt anyone else before the Chiefs would have either. So it simply comes down to the fact that we didn't value Worthy in the 1st round. KC gave us a 3rd to draft a player they probably would have gotten anyways.
- 3
-
The stupid thing about this conversation is we could have just taken say Adonai Mitchell at #28. And then the Chiefs would have taken Worthy at #32 anyways.
Whereas with the move we actually made we could take Mitchell at #33 while picking up an extra 3rd and a favorable day three swap. But because it "looks" worse fans are less happy about that scenario than the objectively worse first scenario.
- 1
- 1
- 8
-
1 minute ago, transplantbillsfan said:
Oooohhhh thanks for this. Forgot about Coleman.
My dream is Coleman and Franklin tomorrow. Two WRs with different physical gifts. Plant them on the field with Josh Allen for the next 5+ years and prosper.
- 4
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
3 minutes ago, buffblue said:
To me this would be acceptable but hardly a dream scenario. McConkey is the only sure thing of those five and he has a relatively low ceiling
No WR outside of the top 3 is a sure thing. That's why all along I've wanted us to draft two of them by the end of R2, ideally while picking up an extra 3rd. We're 50% of the way there. Beane just has to close the deal.
-
The only reason people are upset is they assume KC knows better. But their WR draft investments have been meh overall. Rice looks like a good pick but it turns out he's a massive idiot. Moore and Toney and Hardman were straight up bad draft investments.
If Worthy becomes a star this turns out to be an all time stupid move by Beane but let's wait and see how it turns out. And I say this as someone that would have been happy picking Worthy in the 1st, but his flaws are real and it's possible he doesn't ever come close to reaching his potential.
- 2
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Process said:
Still very much alive. I'm waiting until we pick tomorrow before getting too worked up.
I'm not worked up at all. The only wrong thing the Bills could do tonight was draft a non-WR, although that nightmare is unfortunately still a possibility. As long as we still draft a WR at #33, we made the best possible move for sure.
-
The dream is still very much alive. Draft two of these WRs in R2, likely with a medium trade up from #60:
Coleman
Franklin
Mitchell
McConkey
Polk
BPA at #95, perhaps with a small trade up to get a true 3rd round graded player.
- 8
- 2
- 2
-
There you have it. Beane's 1st round grades are wiped out.
- 1
- 2
-
12 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:
If Worthy goes on to light us up in the playoffs...
Imagine if the Chiefs rack up 8 yards per play against us in the playoffs...
Oh yeah, they just did that. It really can't get worse. As long as take a WR here I'm good. Then take another one tomorrow.
-
11 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:
Wow. I hate that decision from Beane. Worthy isn't my guy necessarily but why are you giving the team you are trying to catch and surpass a guy they really covet in a position where they need help?
Best I can say is that if we didn't take Worthy, he was probably going to be there at #32 anyways. If KC wants to give us the picks for the pleasure, by all means.
It's crazy ballsy of course. Because if Worthy is a star, Beane will never live it down. I'm mostly okay with it though.
- 1
-
By the way the trade value matches up exactly perfect by the Rich Hill chart:
https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart-Rich-Hill.asp?RequestTeam=Buf
227 points for both sides.
- 6
- 1
-
By the way the trade value matches up exactly perfect by the Rich Hill chart:
https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart-Rich-Hill.asp?RequestTeam=Buf
227 points for both sides.
- 2
- 1
-
Ugh I love the trade back but you have to do it with the Chiefs? They better have paid a premium.
- 1
- 1
-
Getting really nervous. Please not a DB
- 2
-
4 minutes ago, FireChans said:
I'm genuinely terrified. Green Bay was the opportunity. I hate that I'm not 100% positive Beane isn't that stupid.
- 1
-
4 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:
nope
Dude come on. You did this last year too. What is the deal? You're not impressing anybody knowing picks that are posted by 10,000 people on Twitter. No one in this thread wants the hints. Please just stop.
- 5
- 2
-
5 minutes ago, sven233 said:
If we really wanted BTJ, we would have gotten him.
Don't think he's a character/attitude fit for us. I'm proud of Beane for restraining himself.
- 1
-
The Jaguars signed Davis to an overpriced contract, then drafted the fast version of him in the 1st round. I don't understand their strategy at all but I'm happy we are prevented from trading up for him.
Now Green Bay just has to take DeJean and I can breathe easy when we're on the clock.
- 3
- 1
- 2
-
The Eagles maybe got the best defensive player in two consecutive drafts. Howie Roseman just gets it.
- 1
-
-
I don't know who won the draft but the Vikings pretty clearly lost it IMO.
Good news for us though. Their 2nd round pick next year could be pretty high.
- 2
-
That is a good pick for Cincy, unfortunately.
- 1
- 4
Trading down from 32 to 33 may have been a dumber move than trading down to help the Chiefs!
in The Stadium Wall
Posted · Edited by HappyDays
The 5th round pick doesn't play into the decision at all. In fact on the draft value chart the difference in value from pick 32 to pick 33 is slightly LESS than the other adjacent picks just before and after, which indicates that teams see those picks as closer in value. Presumably because #33 is like $2 million cheaper against the cap which is not an insignificant amount.
If the player you draft at #33 is good you extend them after 4 years. The 5th year option is more of a bargaining chip than anything, and the same concept can be executed with a franchise tag if needed. But I mean really, we are that concerned about something that won't come up until 2029 when Josh Allen is 33 years old?