MAJBobby

Me neither, but Commish said that cannot be a reason, so it was a loaded question that McD answered properly

Agree he seems pretty tired of walking the line of not publicly calling out players but also giving information. It has to be hard walking that line.

A bit different, that is football in the COVID era, those will happen. Being warned about mask wearing and then STILL not wearing a mask on the DAY you know the league is coming is something completely different.

Yesterday players sent home. McKenzie letter shows warnings, yes it does seem to be systemic

And Beasley REALLY should take his own advice from Last year and get off Social Media. Remember when the Steelers players went after the league on the safety stuff, they became targeted by the league

Guess we will find out. if he is Vaxxed (might still have been in the 2 week window after the second shot) the NFL would consider that unvaxxed I think I read. Maybe it was just a misunderstanding of language, However the fact he did get a warning in July, and then the DAY the league is at OBD, still wont put the mask on. either way if is vaxxed but just not out of the final two week window, I would expect an appeal. Maybe to at least get him out of the Cross Hairs for enhanced discipline

Yeah I will say that I think Stevenson was drafted to Replace Beasley NEXT year. Similar to Davis / Brown. Davis just had to step up much earlier than I think the Bills would have liked. Will Stevenson have to do the same is the question.

OOO ***** I didnt even catch that. LMAO

Very easy. McKenzie is a non rookie that hasnt played MUCH. The Skill Sets are a wash, and ooo He hasnt Muffed Kicks, He is available and he apparently isnt a headache, yep a Wash

Easy statement all the way around, unless you are talking about say a Nuke Hopkins or Elite players being cut, then obviously the GM would be lying in that answer. But seriously here we are talking about a Gadget Returnman and a Slot (when we drafted INTO that position). Think of Stevenson as Gabe Davis, Drafted to replace Beasley next season, maybe have to step up earlier ala Davis and Brown

And still a WR group that will put up a 13 win Season IMO. Though I agree the group is better with Beasley, McKenzie IMO is a wash with Stevenson

Question "Beane why did you Cut McKenzie" He is on a 1 year contract, Stevenson is future in that position and has performed well and improved alot, and availability. There EASY You think ANY GM is going to say we cut them because they were unvaxxed?

Looks like they have one more violation before they start getting suspensions

Which is fine as long as he is following protocols (which seems to be). But dang really Beasley and McKenzie didnt when they KNEW the league was in the building, I man that is not even trying to hide it

I Do think there is a way to move on from BOTH Beasley and McKenzie if that is what the FO decides. WR - Diggs / Kumerow Slot - Sanders / Stevenson WR - Davis / This is the spot a little up in the air

Can we SERIOUSLY have a football discussion on the issue without this????

"Process" "Team DNA" are all those just lip service? sure seems it for some players

Yes you can Waived/Injured

I actually JUST typed something similar up while you were posting

Here is another thing. Could this play in to roster Decisions. Lets Say Marquez Stevenson is vaxxed and therefore not subject to the enhance rules that Beasley and McKenzie have at least ignored once. McKenzie is on a 1 year deal.... So Cut Down day, the decision comes down between Stevenson and McKenzie. Would the Team look at the Risk, they know Beasley is going to do Beasley at this point, would they want a guy that is less risk according to the protocols behind him (Stevenson) or would they go with evidently the more risky choice in McKenzie. I would think that Risk HAS to be thought about when making the final 53.

Dont forget TD Jesus LOL

Yeah this wont hurt the team at ALL. Now this also validates that no matter what MeKenzie said when he re-signed he would not play for Candy LMAO