Jump to content

4th&long

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,210
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 4th&long

  1. 3 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

    J6 did happen.  

     

    The official story from the Democrats and the J6 committee is 150,000 angry protesters, with direction and under orders from the outgoing President, attacked the Capitol with the objective of taking over the government and installing the outgoing President as the new President. Some claim a for life job. Yet they failed to achieve or even come close to their objective. The "insurrection" was a failure both in planning and execution. In subsequent months and years almost every person entering the Capitol was arrested and convicted of one charge or another. Are you with me so far?

     

    Now the part which to this day goes without explanation and very little discussion and no questioning. Even with such a simple question. Which is, faced with a token force of Capitol Police, and no National Guard reinforcements, how could 150,000 protesters challenged by only about 200 police officers fail to take over the Capitol? Just stopping a crowd that large with such intent with only about 200 officers armed with sidearms seems impossible. Because it is impossible. What stopped them? To believe that 200 officers stopped the takeover of the Capitol is to raise this event to the legendary performance of the 300 Spartans that repelled the entire Persian army at Thermopylae in 480 B.C. In order to believe the official J6 "story" you need to suspend reality and dismiss critical and logical thinking. 

     

    Because the logical explanation is the crowd failed to take over the Capitol and achieve their aims because they had no intent to take over the building, overthrow the incoming administration, and reinstall the former President, or stop the electoral vote count. A small number of people attending the protest resorted to violence with the possibility of government agency infiltration into their ranks and some official incitement of the violence. Those responsible for the violence should and were held responsible. The government under Biden refused to divulge specifics or comment on government involvement. The J6 Committee wouldn't touch or entertain the topic lest it spoil their preconceived conclusions. Expectations are soon we will know more facts and details. 

    I can't imagine anyone is reading all this drivel. I didn't., save it. 

  2. Me and all my kids caught covid, some how my wife never did. And I told her I was staying in the living room. She stayed in their with me. Oldest son, who was a young healthy 17 year old at the time sounded like a fat 80 year old smoker when he walked up the stairs. We got worried about him, thought he was going to need to go to the doctor but he didn't. My cousin got it bad, was in the hospital and was near death. I don't want to hear it was a hoax. ***** people they can do and say what they want. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  3. 5 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

    Then let me ask directly- did you believe the "experts" that protesting in 2020 was safe but going to a party with 10 people was dangerous? 

    I didn't listen to anything anyone said. I tried to make the best decision for my family that I could in the area we live with the info I had. My kids were not going to be pawns in some politically mixed up pandemic. I didn't go to any parties or protests. I didn't like wearing masks but I was not going to cause a scene in a store. I don't give a ***** what other people did. 

  4. 5 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

    Post like this are so funny because no one my side believes this, we simply disagree on whether J6 was handled properly. The more info on J6 come out the more the FBI looks incompetent and complicit. But seeing as your side literally believed that COVID was dangerous but not if you stood in packed crowd to protest racism, I might not try such snark. 

    My side? That's where I stopped reading. My side is trump is an idiot./

  5. 3 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

    You seem a little defensive about clicking around pride.com. Maybe that says something.

    Your the one who keeps talking about it, maybe that says something. I'm secretly in love with you big boy. 

  6. 1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

    I just think it’s nice that you are sniffing around pride.com, especially with Pride Month just around the corner. Your interest is indicative of personal growth. Keep up the good work!

    For not commenting on a thread you sure are commenting a lot. 

     

    I use an app that pulls in articles from all over the web. It's not like you sniffing around trumps balls. 

  7. 1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

    You have admitted to being a homophobe. Looks like you were lying. Awesome work!

    I don't mind if they join in mocking Trump. You just keep doing your job sucking trumps ass

  8. 1 hour ago, JaCrispy said:

    Actually quite the opposite- the effort was certainly there, and hundreds of billions of dollars of savings were found…

     

    Now, whether the Establishment Republicans have the balls to make the recommended cuts, is a different story, as Elon does not have the authority to make the cuts, himself…

     

    But Elon certainly did was hired to do…👍

     

     

    Hundreds of billions?? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Rotflmao! 

  9. 10 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

    I’m sure it’s disappointing and a little embarrassing to start a thread that no one is interested in engaging with. It happens to Tiberius and BillsLander a lot. This is me pretending to engage. Hope you have a super day! 

    That's your hero, that's your god. He's going to save America. 

     

    I thought he was playing 4d chess and he was so far ahead of everyone else? They got him figured out. He's an idiot. 

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...