Jump to content

4th&long

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,318
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 4th&long

  1. 1 hour ago, Roundybout said:


     

     

     

    What the hell, man

    These jack asses think that makes it better? This country is in the toilet. 

    3 hours ago, wnyguy said:

    I don't think he's protecting someone involved in this, think of someone who is closer to him than that.

    Trump only cares about one person, himself! These people will say anything to direct people away from Trump and to distract. 

  2. 2 hours ago, B-Man said:

     

    I honestly spit my coffee out Teef. . . . . . LOL

     

     

     

     

    Meanwhile:

     

    "Looks terrible — until you learn that [VICTIM] is the late Virginia Giuffre, who had worked for Trump before she fell into Epstein’s clutches, and had publicly said time and again that the future president never misbehaved in the least toward her."

    Writes the Editorial Board of the New York Post, in "Epstein emails: The Dems and their lapdogs with laptops cry Wolff again."

     

    What an incredibly sleazy move, redacting the name Virginia Giuffre, as if it were to protect her, when her name has already been public, she wrote a book to get her story out, she's told us she believed Trump did nothing wrong, and she's no longer alive. It's plainly and deliberately deceptive, and it's stupid too, because the name was going to come out, as it did in less than one day.

     

    Such an idiotic distraction. I'm happy to look at any new evidence about the Epstein story, but I don't want to waste my time on manipulations like this.

     

    I refuse to read the NYT article, "Michael Wolff, Chronicler of Elites, Provided Epstein With Advice on Trump/Mr. Wolff was enough of an insider to provide advice to Jeffrey Epstein on how to handle his dealings with Donald J. Trump." 

     

    What does "enough of an insider" even mean?? Enough of a Trump hater? I made that a gift link, in case you want to figure out how straight the NYT is playing it.

     

    Posted by Ann Althouse

     

    https://althouse.blogspot.com/2025/11/looks-terrible-until-you-learn-that.html

     

    https://nypost.com/2025/11/12/opinion/epstein-emails-the-dems-and-their-lapdogs-with-laptops-cry-wolff-again/

     

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/business/media/michael-wolff-epstein-trump-emails.html?unlocked_article_code=1.008.4eL_.QbCvCRrLOMS9&smid=url-share

     

     

     

    Still protecting pedos, just like at church. 

  3. 18 minutes ago, B-Man said:

     

     

     

    The Democrats’ Latest Trump-Epstein 'Bombshell' Actually Vindicates Trump

    Matt Margolis

     

    Democrats are scrambling to change the subject after caving on the government shutdown, and their latest stunt is hilariously transparent.

     

    On Wednesday, House Oversight Committee Democrats released emails from Jeffrey Epstein's estate that they claimed raised "serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein's horrific crimes."

     

    The problem? The emails prove nothing of the sort.

     

    ABC News even admitted "The full context of these email exchanges is not clear from the portions released by the committee Democrats."

     

    That's putting it mildly.

     

    The supposed bombshell consists of three exchanges from 2011, 2015, and 2019. In a 2011 email between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein referred to Trump as "the dog that hasn't barked," noting that an alleged victim had spent hours at Trump's house but Trump's name had "never once been mentioned." Maxwell responded, "I have been thinking about that."

     

    That's it. No accusation. No evidence. No incriminating information whatsoever.

     

    The victim referenced in those emails is Virginia Giuffre, whose name was redacted in the Democrat release. And there is probably a good reason they did.

     

    Giuffre, who previously worked at Mar-a-Lago, has consistently stated under oath that she never witnessed Trump engage in any wrongdoing. She testified that Trump never acted inappropriately with her, that she never saw Trump and Epstein together, and that she never saw Trump at any of Epstein's homes. Her memoir makes abundantly clear that Trump had zero involvement in Epstein's illegal activities.

     

     

    The 2015 emails show Epstein corresponding with anti-Trump author Michael Wolff, who was fishing for gossip during Trump's first presidential campaign back in 2016. Wolff, not Epstein, suggested ways to "hang" Trump politically depending on how he answered media questions about Epstein. Wolff is literally trying to urge Epstein to blackmail Trump in the email over the issue of whether Trump flew on Epstein's plane or had been to his home. "If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency," Wolff wrote. "You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt."

     

    Then there's a January 2019 email between the two in which they discussed whether Trump had banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago years earlier.

     

    More at the link:  https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/11/12/the-democrats-latest-trump-epstein-smear-actually-vindicates-trump-n4945915

     

     

     

     

     

    A lot of pedos in the catholic church too. You have experience defending pedos. 

  4. 1 minute ago, Big Turk said:

     

    Well some wanted Worthy or Legette, Coleman has more yards this year than both of them.

     

    Let's not pretend the other ones they could have picked are some kind of stars.

     

    McConkey was also never in play because they already had Shakir in the slot, so that's not really a valid argument.

    A lot more things they could have done that day than these two guys. They move up and down the draft board all the time. And worthy is head and shoulders better than Coleman. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. 1 hour ago, IYKYK said:

    I’m not the one who is being a douche. You B word and most over EVERYTHING Trump does! Maybe you shouldn’t be so narrow minded. 
    As far as a 50 year mortgages? Not gonna happen. Unless democrats get in power again and turn this country into a communist country. 

    What an as shole. 

  6. 10 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    C.  over $1mil in interest on a 50 year loan.  That's $1mil less for retirement and still paying a mortgage at 75 or 80.  Lord, I hope people are smarter than that.

    They elected Trump so I wouldn't count on people being smarter than this. 

    11 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    I thought this was a joke when I first read it. 50 year mortgages, what could go wrong?

     

    I see some reddit posters have already done the math. Example:

     

    A 50 year mortgage doesn't actually bring down the cost of a home by that much.

    Consider a 430k home. 30 year FRM would be 6%. 50 year FRM would be 6.5% to account for the longer term.

    Monthly payment on 30 year is 2578 and on the 50 year is 2423. Total interest paid on the 30 year is $498k and on the 50 year is $1024k.

     

    Got that? The 50 year mortgage would "save" the buyer about $150/month, at the cost of paying half a million more bucks over the length of the loan.

     

    Possibilities:

    A. He really is that stupid.

    B. He really thinks you are that stupid.

    C. Both A & B.

    Sounds like an idea someone who regularly bankrupted business would come up with. 

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...