K-Apps
-
Posts
206 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by K-Apps
-
-
Basically AB wanted to play with Derek Carr over Josh Allen listening to the conversation. Man, seems like AB thinks Allen as “trash” like Ramsey. Allen better hope with a huge prove it chip on his should this season to disprove the many skeptics still out there.
-
-
33 minutes ago, Just Joshin' said:
Why is it clear?
The timing of the report, of this report came out a week or two before the AAF season I could believe it. This just seems like a PR spin by the AAF to keep the attention of their league. I doubt Kaepernick and AAF had any real discussions besides whether he was interested in playing in their league.
-
Clear this story isn’t real, great for the AAF to keep some attention on them as they compete against NBA All-Star Weekend.
-
Just now, OJ Tom said:
No.
? good luck winning with that attitude
-
6 minutes ago, OJ Tom said:
Last week it was "we HAVE to have a dominant O-Line!!)..this week it's the TE.
Why not both ?♂️
-
Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:
No doubt he wants Allen to start, but only if he's ready to roll with from a health perspective. He's finally done with Peterman as he should have been long ago. From my vantage point if Allen's not ready to start, then it's best to make him inactive as they head into the bye week.
That’s fair and that’s how I feel too, guess I wanted a compromising way to this current situation. Shame Anderson isn’t healthy enough to go still.
-
3 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:
If he doesn't start, it means he's not physically ready.
Maybe, I’m just going off what McDermott said this morning. The fact he seemed hopeful that Allen might play tells they believe he’s close to ready to go. He basically also is finally given up on Peterman as well. We will see Sunday, I still think it’s Peterman but I wouldn’t shock me if Allen is active as well.
-
1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:
Allen should either start or be inactive. Anything else makes no sense to me.
I rather have Allen play in a blowout to get some reps in to slow get back from the injury and there no pressure in that scenario. Having him inactive is fine too. Rushing him back for a mealiness game before the bye week makes no sense to me. I rather start him post bye week when he has a full week of practice.
-
I think Allen will be active as the backup to Peterman. If the game gets out of hand, Allen can get some game reps in the 2nd half in a blowout.
-
25 minutes ago, john wawrow said:
Late to this party, but let's clear up some things.
If several members of the media are going to follow this lazy and tired narrative in accusing the Bills if completely mishandling the QB situation, then perhaps they should at least ask a question or two to at least be fair. There was one asked on Tuesday, which is what sparked my thread.
And rather than simply following the tired narrative, someone needs to explain to me how else the quarterback situation needed to be handled.
One valid point made through the discussion on Twitter was the Bills needed to bring in another quarterback immediately after trading McCarron. Beane has acknowledged that as being a mistake.
Otherwise, I've yet to hear any valid rundown on how the quarterback situation has played out since March.
And no, don't respond to me about what about Tyrod?
That ship sailed because Tyrod refused to restructure his contract; the Bills would be handcuffed under the cap with it; and they got a valuable draft pick out of it that allowed them more room to trade up on draft day.
WEO, of course, is trying too hard to over-think things and reading far too much into this as usual.
I'm hardly surprised.
jw
Mr. Wawrow, I will explain in my opinion why they mishandled the situation. I get Tyrod’s contract was a big reason why he was traded away, but if the plan was to let Allen and learn this season than they needed to go after a better option than AJ McCarron. I know Teddy Bridgewater’s reps did not release his medicals, but I felt he was the best option available besides McCown and perhaps Bradford. I watched McCarron in 2015 with a talented Bengals roster and largely unimpressed especially in that playoff game vs Pittsburgh. His very average performance overshadowed by Burfict being Burfict, but I felt he cost them that game more than Burfict. To me the McCarron singled they hoped he would be a solid stopgap this season without any proof he would legitimately do it. Hopefully, this off-season they take having a good back-up QB with more importance.
-
1 hour ago, H2o said:
Kyle Shanahan
Picking Rex over Shanahan was another bad Pegula mistake
-
3
-
-
2 hours ago, quinnearlysghost88 said:
I think the Bills want to avoid the publicity that comes with the team that finally signs Kap. Also, WNY is bright red. There are a lot of fans that would have a problem with it. They're not going to rock the boat with the red necks.
I think it has more to do with the fact that signing Kaep would be a temporary move and the outrage if they cut him when Allen is healthy would cause a firestorm the organization doesn’t want and wouldn’t be able to handle. Beane/McDermott are already looking shaky as a tandem, they don’t need any more create any more fires they can’t handle
-
BPA, trading down when you lack elite talent period is a foolhardy mission that bad franchises do (Browns). If it’s D-Line, O-Line, WR, TE, or LB, doesn’t matter, just pick the best player that can contribute right away.
-
1
-
-
If the Bills are going to keep this Peterman facade, might as well hire his Pitt OC Matt Canada then lol
-
7 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:
Should we be looking for an offensive minded Head Coach? I say yes.
McDermott should’ve never been hired in the 1st place. To go from Rex to McDermott, it shows how clueless the Pegulas are about building a modern NFL franchise. They really should’ve hired McVay, Shanahan, or a young, bright offensive mind in college. Hiring an conservative, meat and potatoes defensive coach like McDermott showed no progressive thinking whatsoever.
-
2
-
-
-
14 minutes ago, Gugny said:
I think putting a 35-year-old QB who's been on the Bills for a week and hasn't taken a meaningful snap in two years would be a pretty bad move.
Plus it won't be nearly as fun, as far as TBD meltdowns are concerned.
Can’t be worse than Peterman, I can’t see any scenario Peterman being named as the starter. I think they will be run heavy and limit Anderson to 15-20 pass attempts.
-
1
-
-
Trading back #1OP with one of the least talented rosters is foolish imo. Need premier talent and best way to do it is to pick it. Trading down isn’t the always the best way to build way, hell look all the talent Browns missed by trading back over the years
-
1
-
-
Not getting Bridgewater or Bradford in the off-season when you have an unproven rookie QB and a barely replacement level QB in Peterman was organizational malpractice. Coupled with wasting all that draft capital on Edmunds and Allen with a depleted roster is not smart way to build a team imo, but we will see
-
2 minutes ago, todd said:
Really? It is their job to explore options. Please, let's not get overly dramatic here.
Paxton Lynch is not an NFL QB, this is a waste of time imo.
-
1
-
-
Really losing some belief in Beane/McDermott that they are working him out, seriously
-
1
-
-
Makes up for the Allen pick by a lot imo
-
11 minutes ago, Idandria said:
So take they guy they don’t like? No guys, no glory. GO BILLS!
Take the BPA or Best QB left, Allen was neither
How important is the Week 1 game against the Jets
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Anybody who doesn’t think beating a divisional opponent on the road isn’t important doesn’t realize Bills and Jets more likely gonna be battling for a WC spot. Tiebreakers will be important come December, gotta have as many advantages as you can in that criteria.