Andrew Son

So now preseason plays matter, just not yesterday with Darby. At least you're consistent

If Darby had three picks last night I'm sure he'd be right here reveling in it.

Yeah, I agree on the secondary, but am not as sold on the front 7 outside of Hightower. I'm not sure David Harris is David Harris anymore

Not to derail the thread, but what do you make of the Pats* defense this year? I see them having a borderline elite secondary with absolutely zero pass rush. Not the way I would build a defense.

Thanks for posting, always enjoy these

That is a point I like to make. I think he is the type of back that can age well

Hopefully no one else at ESPN named Ryan is found naked

The definition of schedule 1 is having no medicinal value. That is clearly false

Christie is against, but they hate him there. My understanding is that they will legalize the moment he is gone

Population centers are so close on the east coast, once one major state went it was going to be dominos

It is only a matter of time. My understanding is that NJ is likely to legalize next year. That will probably push NY to do so as NJ will get a windfall from NYers crossing over

Tyrod is probably driving him to rehab, and doing the icing and taping himself. "Hows that feel, Cordy?!?!" "Feeling better?!?!"

That should do the trick

If a franchise QB is sitting there, then yes, we do need to be that team. Get the QB, it is all that matters. Then build around him.

Sure, not sure how likely that is though

+1. Ideal situation would be the Browns getting the number 1 pick and Kizer having shown signs of being the guy. Then they would feel comfortable trading down with a team that could give them a bunch of picks...

Yeah, you need to get this checked out immediately. I can't imagine what your typing will look like with any further eye damage.

It is an apt reason for his retirement. Confederate statues are currently moving faster than Boldin.

You have a window? Fancy

Not the point, and I don't necessarily believe any of that about Sammy. The point is that you were hammering posters for posting their opinions on Sammy. Demanding proof. Then, in this situation, you post absolute speculation with zero proof. Has your narrative not been debunked by all of the reports on why Boldin retired? Or do you only need "proof" when you don't agree?

I find your position on this amazing, especially given your take on the Sammy situation... Some posters were drawing conclusions about Sammy maybe being a prima donna, not being a great leader, not always taking care of his body in the best way, and maybe a bit soft. There were some interesting comments made by teammates like Shady and Boldin, comments Sammy made himself, and even comments from Leroi- who obviously gets some inside info. But no, nothing good enough for 26. We need concrete statements! None of this speculation! Link?... Some might ask- "You think they would ever say that publicly?" Then the Boldin retirement... And the actual statement made by Boldin, and others, can't be correct. Only rampant speculation will do! You think he would ever say that publicly? Your inconsistencies show you are obviously pushing a narrative.

More BS cherry picking. I'm sure you're also aware that he mentioned getting back Matthews and Gaines as "proof." And what does boldins decision to retire have to do with Beane's intentions when he signed him? Are you saying Beane knew he was going to retire?

I'm confused as to the "move that they made" here with Boldin that generated all of this outrage?

What does that mean? Win now and later? Like they said? Maybe, correctly, they didn't see a change in this teams win total going from Sammy and Darby to Matthews and Gaines? And they got the picks to build their team. This place has gotten so whiny

Why did they get Matthews and Gaines back in the deal then?