thebyrdman31

YouTube TV will only stream games in your market area ... unless ... you are part of a family plan in which the main account holder is in WNY, thats the case with me (lives in DC) but I still get the local channels of that area, including the Bills games.

Benjamin Allbright ✔@AllbrightNFL Think it's down to NYJ and Buff for Matt Paradis. We'll see if anyone jumps in last minute. $$

Jets are working on finalizing deal with (C) Matt Paradis source says it's getting close to being done barring any late snags. https://twitter.com/incarceratedbob/status/1105175753082236928

Im right there with you, i dont want to see him leave either, but hes on a line of 3 pro-bowlers, if this was a case in which one of those guys werent tagged, and we were about to let a guy like dareus walk, i would be alot more frustrated. i think they know what they are willing to pay, and tagging him for twice of what hes worth prob wasnt in their best interest. again, think they feel a deal will be reached.

http://www.buffalorumblings.com/buffalo-bills-news/2015/2/20/8075255/jerry-hughes-nfl-free-agency-2015-buffalo-bills-re-sign-doug-whaley If negotiations end up going south, the Bills sound willing to consider the franchise tag on Hughes, but Whaley told Simon on Friday that the team would rather not do that. "We hope we don’t have to go down that road," Whaley said Friday. "Right now, we’re of the feeling that we can get this thing done, and make sure everybody feels happy about it. You start using that tag, there’s some feelings from the player’s side that, you just don’t want to go down that road, because we want to have a long, healthy relationship." My guess/hope is that they feel they are close to a deal, and felt they didnt need to use the tag. All indications have been that he wants to stay and the front office has sounded highly optimistic that this thing can get done. Just my two cents.

"The Buffalo Bills are pursuing a trade for St. Louis Rams quarterback Sam Bradford, multiple league sources told Yahoo Sports." http://sports.yahoo.com/news/sources--bills-eyeing-qb-sam-bradford-184954525.html

Here is what Cole had to say, via SB Nation: "This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else." http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html

My favorite plan that I have seen so far, makes the most sense, stadium built in perry projects, extension of light rail, and expansion of cobblestone district. thoughts? http://twointhebox.com/2014/08/08/the-2itb-plan-for-a-bills-stadium/

Report: Rogers will not make bid on Bills A report from the Toronto Sun Tuesday morning, has indicated that Edward Rogers III will not make a bid on the Buffalo Bills. "Even though the Rogers family fortune was estimated last fall by Canadian Business magazine to be $7.6 billion, two sources said Rogers himself was not in a position to be a sole bidder for the NFL club," John Kryk reported. Even though Rogers won't be heading the Toronto group to bid for the Bills, it is unclear whether Rogers will end up becoming a minority investor under Jon Bon Jovi and Larry Tanenbaum. However, the Toronto Sun reports that "the groups once unwavering intention apparently has changed in recent weeks," when it comes to relocating the Bills to Toronto. "The Bills aren't leaving western New York this decade, and probably a lot longer that that. Even to Toronto." http://www.wgr550.com/Report-Rogers-will-not-make-bid-on-Bills/19323337

John Kryk of The Toronto Sun reported on Wednesday a clarification of previous reports regarding the Buffalo Bills stadium lease: that a reported $400 million relocation buyout option does not exist, at least in the way we have understood it for 16 months. Instead, Kryk reports that the payment - which still drops to $28 million between the 2019 and 2020 seasons, giving any new Bills owner intent on moving the franchise a one-time out within the next nine years - exists as a sort of backup plan in the event that said owner wins a court battle to break the Bills' lease agreement with Erie County. Kryk's report, based on a conversation with Marc Ganis of Sports Corp, Ltd., strongly hints that the idea of anyone winning that court battle is extremely unlikely. It's an important distinction, and further cements the idea that the Bills aren't going anywhere, regardless of who buys them, for at least another six years. The lease for Ralph Wilson Stadium currently runs through 2022. The Bills, Erie County and New York State have already begun assembling a committee to investigate the possibility of a new stadium in Western New York, while $130 million in renovations are already underway for the team's current beloved facility in Orchard Park. http://www.buffalorumblings.com/buffalo-bills-news/2014/3/27/5552758/buffalo-bills-stadium-lease-relocation-fee-ralph-wilson

Nike site shows a different collar http://www.nike.com/us/en_us/c/nfl/buffalo-bills