Jump to content

eSJayDee

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,763
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by eSJayDee

  1. Okay, so the Fins managed to circumvent the existing protocol to allow Tua to re-enter the game.  I don't care about that.  Congratulations.

    What pisses me off, is that if he has a back injury, that's SO severe that it causes him "gross motor instability", how the F%$%^& can ANY medical professional w/ good conscience (& ability) allow him to subject himself to more potential (possibly permanent) damage/injury?

    If you truly are prioritizing player safety that's absolutely appalling and needs to be penalized & not allowed to continue.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 2
  2. 16 minutes ago, LabattBlue said:

    I was out at a bar and didn’t get a good look at the replay…was the blocked FG a miss hit by Bass?

    Yes, as others have said it was blocked, but it was a terrible kick.  I don't think the penetration was significant & it was blocked about 6' off the ground & seemingly no end over end action, which I think you would have by then.

    • Agree 3
  3. 6 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

     

     

    This is a TBD myth, not fact.

     

    He ran afoul of the refs in 2014 and 2015 (couldn't keep his mouth shut).. After that, they pretty much left him alone.  He had a season with 9 penalties, then nothing significant.

    Yes, he didn't have many calls against him, but (now maybe this is a homer's or observational bias) it seemed like he was often a victim of, shall we say, lenient holding officiating.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 6
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  4. I believe once defenders have control of the ball-carrier (so that he can't advance?), the play is whistled dead.  So I believe Singletary could theoretically  lift his feet off the ground (w/ no self imposed forward momentum) & the play should end.

    As I'm not sure about the specifics of the rule & given the interpretation (& necessary prompt whistle), I'm not optimistic that it would work & therefore isn't a prudent strategy.

  5. At the time, it certainly looked like it warranted a challenge.  Doubtful that it'd be overturned, but looks like he had that 2nd foot down w/ ball in possession.

    In hindsight, and considering the probability that it actually would be overturned, that extra timeout allowed us to potentially win the game; moreso, IMO, than a 2nd(?) down play near the goal line when we had 2(?) more to score).

  6. A couple of things I can think of -

    1) It was a "reward" to Barkley.  As people had mentioned, it's a practice game, so it doesn't really matter.

    2) Perhaps Bass can't reliably catch a snap.  Trust me, having someone throw a ball to you underhand, as hard as an average person is capable of throwing, w/ your hands away from your body, is a LOT more challenging than you think. 

    And, of course  as people have mentioned, there's the injury risk.  Replacing a 3rd string practice squad QB is easier than an elite kicker.  (For that matter, Barkley's value to the team is not based on his physical capabilities.)

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  7. 16 minutes ago, JayBaller10 said:

    In the MattvsMatt Puntapalooza, Buscaglia says Araiza won the day, his 2nd straight practice win. The results after 8 punts:
     

    Haack

    Avg yards: 43.1

    Hang time: 4.46

     

    Araiza

    Avg yards: 48.4

    Hang time: 4.39

    Is that really winning?  I'd say winning is having decisively better hang time & slightly better yardage.  Failing that to have even a slight edge, you've gotta be better in both metrics.

    • Disagree 1
  8. I saw OJ play.  He was definitely the best RB at the time, but he wasn't head over shoulders better than a few others.  Jim Brown was before my time, but from what I understand, he was like a man amongst boys.  Just dominant.  Statistically at least, there was a receiver before the proliferation of the forward pass who far exceeded the output of any others.  I think it was Don Hudson of GB, but again, that was before my time.

     

    I'll add Walter Payton was IMO the best player of his era.  He might not have exceeded others excessively statistically speaking, but he was great at everything - running, catching, blocking, punting.  Anything.

  9. 59 minutes ago, FireChans said:

    Lol I mean sure, but Mac’s ball a little more accurately placed outside is a TD. And Sanders was way more open.

    I don't think he was any more open.  Hyde was able to close & make the INT cuz he was moving (much) faster than the ball.  Sanders (still) had no one near him cuz the ball got there so quickly. 

    More outside might/probably would've done it but throwing the ball w/ more velocity & less arc definitely would've made it impossible to make a defensive play on it.

    • Agree 4
  10. 16 minutes ago, wppete said:


    one of the great plays by a Bills DLine in the last decade. Amazing play! Damn that was a great defense too bad our offense was brutal. 

     


     

     

    I thought this was going to be another play.  A fumble return (I think he scored), where he made moves & avoided tackles that would've made Barry Sanders envious.

  11. Our cap issues in the past were 2 fold -

    1) We had the edict "cash to the cap", which is to say we were NOT spending up to the cap, ie Ralph is cheap

    2) We saddled ourselves w/ burdensome contracts.  That isn't so much a cap issue, but rather a talent assessment problem.  ie we were giving lots of $ to people that didn't live up to their contracts.

    Related to #2 - I've noticed that we now have a few contracts that are "burdensome" (Allen, White, Miller & I think a few more).  Hopefully, these guys continue to live up to their contracts; if they don't we'll be in trouble in the next few yrs.

  12. Only thing I really see it is that it's a sleezy thing to do to the player.  The team is free to not tender a RFA thereby immediately making them a UFA.  As a RFA he's free to shop around his svcs & he presumably found not much of a market, so he signs the tender.  Problem w/ RFA is that the potential signing team doesn't immediately get the player.  Player can only submit 1 offer, so they'll be shopping around their svcs; then the team holding his rights has 7 days(?) to match. When there's a race for signing talent, these issues lower that player's desirability.

    • Agree 1
  13. I don't see a problem w/ this.  He's a top flight backup to bottom rank starter quality.  Only thing bad I see is so much guaranteed.  If they're able to fix/develop Jones & presumably draft someone that works out, that's a lot of dead cap they've gotta account for.

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...