erynthered

BiB

Why does this not surprise me.

Coming from someone with a " Cowbell" avatar really makes your post even more hilarious.

Daytona 74 , for me!

So what you're saying is... That the Irish people in San Diego are Poll sitters? Isn't that illegal?

So, they're light Poll's?

And calling wrong numbers

They need more Poll's in Kalifornia.

Do they have Poll's there?

Poll right? Is that a sailing maneuver?

Polish jokes are much more funnier.

So? What about it.

Is this a Poll?

Is this a poll?

You forgot one thing. We're also moving to Toronto.

GG's right. And NOW, I cant find the NYT piece.

Sorry, thought I did. NY Times. I'll find it again later. Time for lunch.

Like I said, Questionable. Like I said, Questionable. For example:

If a Democrat is elected president, say hypothetically Mrs. Clinton is elected president in 2008, are you telling me that Mrs. Clinton will not be free to fire any United States attorney because to do so would be political? As far as those fired, doing a fantastic job. Thats questionable. This whole thing is, to use your own words, Foolish. Carry on.......

In comparison to President Clinton's firing of all 93 U.S. Attorneys, this is nothing. And there appear to be good reasons for replacing these officials, who all serve at the pleasure of the President anyway. Its the Law. The scandal here is not that 8 U.S. Attorneys were sacked, but that the White House communications operation is still not up to the task of defending its position against political attacks.

This article is from 2 months ago. http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDZmM...YzFjYTRmYTlhNzk I'm shocked too!

And, He'd be able to cover your ass, when you say something stupid.

Miz Frank? Is that you?

Has anyone seen my paper airplane?

His pissed cause he's getting sued. GOOGLEGATE!!!!!!!