BillsFan130
-
Posts
12,567 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by BillsFan130
-
Yep. Got a feeling the bills will go DE/DT in the draft. Its same story- Pass rush not good enough, defensive backs can't cover, and out coached by Andy -
Ok let's end on this- And then we can agree to disagree if need be. If someone told you before the game and you didn't know the outcome from the chiefs offence: The bills got 29 points, 374 yards, and won the time of possession. Would you have taken that, yes or no?
-
Exactly- Chiefs defence in 4 games last post season games didn't let up 30 points. (And haven't let up 30 in 2 games this year( I believe this is the most points they have given up since the Super Bowl against Philly. 29 should be enough to win
-
Agreed. I'm just looking big picture- 29 points should be enough to win. Did the offence have a chance and could they have done better at the end? Ya for sure. But I'm looking at the game from a macro view - Almost 400 yards of offence and 29 points on the road against a top 5 D is pretty damn good
-
100 percent. If you are gonna win a Super Bowl, it's almost impossible to score 30 plus points every game lol. Especially against elite defences. KC won a game 17-10 in the afc championship game last year against Lamar Jackson to get to the Super Bowl. Its just unrealistic to ask for 32-35 points every game from your O
-
The defence does suck, agreed . Which cost them the game . (Which was my point) Can't keep depending on the offence to score 30 plus points to win 4 playoff games in a row against elite defences. Just not going to happen
-
KC had their best output today all season on offence. I would expect the bills defence to hold them under 30, as KC was under 30 all season with the exception of one game where they were right at 30. This is not the Tyreek Hill/prime Travis Kelce Chiefs offence where you should need 35 points to win
-
Yep- like I posted before, the problem is they play and design their defence to play bend but don't break all season. Then they ask their zone corners to play man to man in the playoffs and be more aggressive. It's such a backwards philosophy
-
Yep, sadly you're correct . He wouldn't
-
Not time to move on from McDermott. But time to move on from his defensive scheme. He needs to hire a DC from the outside and change this scheme that gets crushed every year in the playoffs by KC
-
Interesting take- If someone told me bills got 29 points before this game, I would have signed up for that in a heart beat. KC literally got like 210 yards last week This game as a whole, is 80 percent on the defence IMO
-
Yep. Elam sucks. But they tried to mold him into a zone corner. And you can tell he plays like a guy who is terrified of making a mistake as he plays 10 yards off the receiver and holds when he's slightly beat
-
Joe Brady and Aaron Kromer had a rough night
BillsFan130 replied to Einstein's topic in The Stadium Wall
It was too conservative and predicable again . (Mostly predictable) I said that last week but got roasted for it -
I know- But big picture at the end of the day, I think getting 29 points on the road against a good defence should be plenty. Wouldn't you agree?
-
Problem is the bills philosophy and players are built for zone, and then they try to play a lot of man. Its a backwards philosophy- They need to start bringing in more man to man players in their back 7, instead of playing heavy zone all season and then trying to change it up in the playoffs
-
Fair- but I think that's the difference between our teams. We look at letting a field goal as a win, The chiefs don't. They stop them when the game is on the line and let up 0 points , where we are content with letting up 3
-
Yep. It will continue to let them down if McDermott keeps running this scheme. He needs to take a long hard look in the mirror and realize it's not good enough. And hire an outside the building DC to change up this scheme/philosophy
-
Exactly- And realistically it would have been 31 points. (If not for declining the made extra points and the failed two point conversions)
-
Yep Mark Andrews is a perennial all pro/pro bowler who had a bad game last week. Kincaid isn't even close to his level
-
Yep. 29 points on the road against a good defence should be well enough to win. KCs offence is good, but it's not great. Defence continues to sh*t the bed against KC in the playoffs
-
Yep worthy at this point is objectively better than Coleman. Still early, but that trade down is not looking good right now
-
Your first points are definitely true. But I also think The scheme/coordinator isn't good enough. Which is on McDermott and Babich
-
It's McDermotts defence, but Babich also sucks as a DC. Andy was a step ahead of him all night. Even the last 3rd and 9 which iced the game. He knew Babich was gonna call man. He calls the perfect man beater, and it's curtains
-
What? It literally went right through his hands. Im not sure if you're being sarcastic or not?
-
Not in the fire McDermott camp. But I will say this.. He needs to hire an outside defensive coordinator and needs a makeover with his defensive philosophy. This undersized penetration style (which still gets 0 pass rush) simply is not good enough against KC. Time after time after time
