^ and here is the primary example of the person I'm describing in this thread. Despite any and all statistical proofs, there are Bills fans who insist the guy's actually good.
If that's the case, then why all the dollars and effort spent on the position?
Why not just find two random tubs of goo to go out there and eat up space?
That's your completely incorrect and unsolicited opinion, but OK.
I'm thinking a 2 sack a year DT could be had for a whole lot cheaper than Ed.
And, please, for the love of all that's good and holy, spare me the pass rush win rate baloney
Exactly, for as much as people here over-rate oliver, they under-rate Edmunds.
Now that he's gone, everyone's knickers are twisted up about the MLB position. Would have been better off giving Ed's money to Edmunds.
Wasn't my argument, sorry for any confusion.
My opinion: People over-rate Oliver, including this FO. I mean they signed the guy to another contract when he clearly didn't earn one.
I look at other DTs from his draft class and tend to disagree with your opinion.
He's an average, undersized and underwhelming DT.
No, everyone KNEW those guys were bad.
Some people here still refuse to believe that Ed Oliver was an absolute waste of a top-10 pick and should never have been re-signed