Jump to content

RunTheBall

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,845
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RunTheBall

  1. sounds like the first surgen did a bad job from what my sister says. they are watching him closely at this time.--- thanks for the prayers

    321530[/snapback]

     

    I hope for a full recovery for your brother-in-law and wish your family the best. Keep in mind that it's possible that everything was done right. Operating on the carotid artery is major vascular surgery and has serious risks.

     

    RTB

  2. Actually, that's a fair perspective. I'm sure the Bills watched many players they hoped would fall to #55 get picked early and Parrish was the best athlete available at that spot.

    315920[/snapback]

     

    That sums up the Bills first day of the draft succinctly and accurately. Sometimes the picks don't fall as you want them to and you can't draft for need and value at the same time. I'm glad TD picked the best athlete available instead of reaching for a prospect.

     

    RTB

  3. i would have attempted to trade up for barnes (went 3 spots ahead)........

     

    failing that, i would have took adam terry........

     

    why? a potential starting LT is much more important and harder to find then a potential 3rd string slot WR with return ability......i think we already have those needs filled (josh reed, fast freddie, nate).......

    315915[/snapback]

     

    I wasn't sold on Terry. I'm an SU grad and watched all but 1 game this season and was surprised the pundits were talking about him going so high. I think it is more indicitive of the lack of talent at the tackle position in this year's draft.

     

    RTB

  4. I look at it this way - There was a RB available for AZ to pick at 44 so the TH trade was off, even if we still wanted to do it. By that time, the 3 offensive linemen we've heard about (Baas, Mankins, Spencer) were already gone so it didn't make sense for us to jump 11 spots anymore even IF it were possible.

     

    I was surprised at the Parish pick but not dismayed. I have to conclude that the CBs, DTs, and OL still left were not worth the 55 pick and we could get better value at these positions later in the draft.

     

    I'd like to know from people who have studied the draft more than I who would you have picked at #55 instead of Parish and why?

     

    RTB

  5. Once the 3 O-lineman were off the board before AZ's pick, I think the trade with AZ went out the door. I think we're looking at either a 3rd round pick this year (which I think is TH's value) or a 2nd rounder next year for TH. Tampa and AZ are out of the running, which leaves pretty much the Eagles. I'm glad Nugent is out of the picture. We'll probably go CB or DT wtih #55.

     

    RTB

  6. Is Berman going to give this kid a reach-around too? How pathetic do you look when the ESPN guys feel sorry for you and are begging teams to take you. If they are going to stroke this kid like he's the next Favre, they should at least have kept the camera on him as he dropped dropped dropped. I think he's over rated even at 24.

     

    RTB

  7. Not really a fair assessment as Jim wasn't anywhere near as lead-footed as DB, TH wasn't anywhere near the blocker/receiving threat Thurman Thomas was, Pete Metz/Keith McKellar were far more feared than our current TE duo, and until this past season there wasn't a second threat the equivalent of James Lofton.

     

    There's simply more to it than just the OLine.

    313110[/snapback]

     

    Ya, what was I thinking. Jennings was as good as Wolford. I'd take Lawrence Smith over Richter. Teague would give Hull a run for his money. Davis was no Villarial. And House Ballard wasn't anywhere near as good as Mike Williams.

     

    I understand having hall of fame players such as Kelly/Thomas/Reed on the O will make your o-line look good. That being said, our current o-line would be lucky to back up our line in 1991.

     

    RTB

  8. I actually have a couple of friends who are vegetarians and they avoid leather products as well.  One of them won't even ride in my car due to the all-leather interior (the other doesn't mind).

     

    CW

    307842[/snapback]

     

    That's cool. I don't have a problem with them taking what they feel is a moral stand as long as its consistent. For those vegetarians who don't make it a moral issue and just don't eat meat, all the more fur to 'em.

     

    RTB

  9. I don't have a problem with vegetarians, eat whatever the hell you like. Just don't go pulling the moral trump card as you walk around in your fine leather jacket, belt, and shoes. Most vegetarians I know who make an issue out of it are hyprocrits in that respect.

     

    I love veal, the less that little dude moves the better.

    Chickens are the wildebeast of the western world. Their sole purpose in life is to act as food for the rest of the chain.

     

    RTB

×
×
  • Create New...