B-Man
-
Posts
69,615 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by B-Man
-
-
7 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:
So we are just going to downplay a leftist trying to shoot ICE agents today.
-
-
57 minutes ago, TH3 said:
Texas Floods chiming in
Beyond ignorant.
MEANWHILE:
Democrats retreat on climate: ‘It’s one of the more disappointing turnabouts.’
By Jeremy B. White and Camille von Kaenel
SACRAMENTO, California — Donald Trump is coming for California’s signature climate policies — and so is California.
Stung by the party’s sweeping losses in November and desperate to win back working-class voters, the Democratic Party is in retreat on climate change. Nowhere is that retrenchment more jarring than in the nation’s most populous state, a longtime bastion of progressive politics on the environment.
Yes, setting Teslas on fire followed by the mass elite’s jet-powered commute to the Bezos wedding signaled the end of the good old days of radical environmentalism.
-
Yeah, we know.
-
Made things worse.
What a big deal, right Joe ?
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
There’s a lot of shady business surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein cover-up.
We’ve gone from lists allegedly being reviewed to now supposedly
no lists existing at all.
Surveillance tapes somehow didn’t work. Prison guards were charged,
then quietly had those charges dropped.
Future Labor Secretary Alex Acosta gave Epstein a sweetheart deal and
then all his emails from that period mysteriously vanished.
The list goes on.
It’s all too murky to untangle, and we have no real way of knowing which
claims are true, which are false, or what really happened in any of these
bizarre “coincidences.”
But there is one thing that could still be definitively exposed, and it would
go a long way toward explaining everything else:
How did Jeffrey Epstein actually make his money? If someone could offer a clear,
credible explanation—that he was just some brilliant investor who made his fortune
through legitimate trading—then maybe, just maybe, the lone-wolf predator theory holds.
Maybe he really was just a monster who occasionally let his powerful friends join in.
But no one has offered that explanation. Not then, not now.
And until they do, the cover-up speaks louder than the silence.
-
No surprise.
-
-
-
-
Of course they are, they are ghouls, it is what they do.
-
10 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
Roundy only laments apparent lack of law enforcement dead at this point.
Example.
On 6/2/2025 at 2:50 PM, Roundybout said:
Don’t care. They’re getting exactly what they deserve.
I’m stunned they didn’t get shot for this. Fake cops, too stupid to join border patrol so they have to do this instead.
-
1
-
-
Democratic Party voters are calling for a revolution. An insurrection, if you prefer that word.
In any case, they want political violence.
Another told Axios that a "sense of fear and despair and anger" among voters "puts us in a different position where ... we can't keep following norms of decorum."
I always find it hilarious when a Democrat warns about "norms." These are the people who have been creating hoaxes about Donald Trump for a decade, sending the FBI after Catholics and disgruntled parents at school board meetings, burning cars in the streets while waving Hamas flags, and attacking ICE agents.
https://hotair.com/david-strom/2025/07/07/axios-democrat-voters-calling-for-violence-n3804535
-
1
-
-
Trump’s 'Take It or Leave It' Tariff Blitz Is Bigger Than Monday
David Manney
Need another example of 'this isn't your grandfather's president"?
Forget quiet, back-channel diplomatic communications. President Trump grabbed a bullhorn, walked into the center of a mass of people, and blasted five words that reverberated off the walls:
"Take it or leave it!"
Twelve countries will receive letters from the president tomorrow, notifying them that their 90-day grace period is about to expire, much like a person realizing too late that their coffee was not decaf.
If they miss their July 9 cutoff, tariffs of up to 70 percent will hit them like a falling piano on a sidewalk.
The FO'd, and now they will FA.
A soft handshake of sorts was shared in April in the form of a 90-day grace period. This was the quiet warning that's been in diplomatic circles for generations.
Except those circles have been made irrelevant.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cut to the chase:
Those countries will be staring at that letter the way I used to when receiving service interruption notices without having a job.
The president isn't pressuring them; he's simply following through on what he said he'd do.
Instead of wanting to play fair with our country in trade, some of those countries seem like they're "going to the mattresses."
Australia is sending warnings about increasing prices. Dairy farms in Canada are holding their breath. Manufacturers in Mexico have been holding emergency meetings.
With industries totally depending on American buyers, it seems that nobody wants to be on the receiving end of a 70 percent slap.
Rebalancing trade imbalance should have taken place a long time ago. One penny at a time, we've been bled dry over decades, resulting in a $12 trillion deficit. That amount isn't abstract; over time, it was factory shut-downs, pensions disappearing, and vibrant towns dependent on "the mill" being quiet.
{snip}
This isn’t Grandpa’s diplomacy. It isn’t a slow-burn compromise. This is fast, intentional leverage. This is American comeback energy.
Whether they sign by July 9 or not, the message is the same: we’ve noticed the imbalance. We’re not silent anymore. And we expect fair play, because we built the market that enables the world.
Trump just stopped waiting. And, like it or not, the rest of the world will.
-
Have We Reached Late-Stage Climate Hysteria?
A United Nation’s report issued last month calls for the criminalization of spreading “disinformation and misinformation” about global warming. Is it the desperate act of a dying crusade – or business as usual for the climate fanatics?
While our hope is the former, it’s more likely the latter.
According to Elisa Morgera, the U.N. special rapporteur on climate change, governments should “criminalize misinformation and misrepresentation (greenwashing) by the fossil fuel industry” as well as “criminalize media and advertising firms for amplifying disinformation and misinformation by fossil fuel companies.”
This is disturbing. Who gets to decide what is “disinformation and misinformation”? We’ve already seen, thanks to COVID-19, that the meaning of those words is determined exploitatively by the ruling class and the loudest voices, not by any objective means.
Just the News quotes experts who say the call for criminalization shows a growing desperation among the climate alarmists. Given that global warming has cooled off considerably as a pressing issue for the public, this rings true.
Yet demanding that skeptics be arrested and tried is not a fresh fantasy for the eco-fascists. They’ve been dreaming about a 21st-century inquisition of those who hold dissenting views (the Galileos of our time?) for more than a decade: Examples at the link
https://issuesinsights.com/2025/07/07/have-we-reached-late-stage-climate-hysteria/
-
1
-
-
From Epstein Island . . . . . . . . . .
.
-
-
-
-
Trump ❤️ Tariffs
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted