Jump to content

B-Man

Community Member
  • Posts

    69,611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by B-Man

  1. THE REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHMENT IS ROOTING FOR DONALD TRUMP OVER TED CRUZ, Erick Erickson posits:

    The truth is this: the establishment wing of the Republican Party would rather Hillary Clinton win than Ted Cruz win. If Ted Cruz wins, a good number of the establishment staff would be on the unemployment line, shut out of jobs in the White House that they covet.

     

    Ted Cruz could use this all in an advertising campaign. The establishment hates him so much they’re rooting for Trump and Hillary. The very guys who lament that the Trump nomination would be the death of the GOP, would rather see Trump win Iowa than Cruz.

     

     

     

    However, as with Obama in 2012, Trump gets results!

     

    Eleanor Darragh, mother of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), was born in Delaware on Nov. 23, 1934, establishing her citizenship by birth — and, according to U.S. law, that of her son, even though he was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, on Dec. 22, 1970.

    The Cruz for President campaign provided Breitbart News exclusively with the birth certificate.

     

     

  2. Is the Hive breaking up with Bill and Hillary?
    American Thinker, by Fritz Pettyjohn

     

    Original Article

     

    The disciplined drones and diligent worker bees of the Hive do the Queen´s bidding, but they also provide feedback to the Queen from the world outside the Hive. This, in turn, informs the Queen´s future instructions. For a quarter century the Hive has viciously swarmed anyone who dared describe Bill Clinton as a sexual predator and Hillary as his enabler. No more.

     

    (snip)

     

    The strength of the Hive has waned, its ability to control the narrative is in decline. Donald Trump, of all people, has proven too strong a force to be ignored

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Politico goes with “GOP slams” angle to downplay Hillary ordering aide to strip classified markings off email.

     

     

     

     

    Bombshell: In Email, Hillary Ordered Aide to Strip Classified Marking and Send Sensitive Material
    Townhall, by Guy Benson

     

    Original Article

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ON GUNS, OBAMA AND HILLARY ARE FORGAINST THEM. Bernie Sanders reminds voters of Hillary Clinton’s fake pro-gun past and it’s brutal:

  3.  

    Six terms?

     

     

    H.W.................(2)....................Bubba..............(2)..........................W....................(2)..................... = 6

     

     

     

    That's what I was criticized for about a year ago, when I declared that I didn't care how good (or bad) a candidate Jeb was

     

    I was NOT going to vote for another person in the immediate family ......................enough.

     

    and .Hillary....................well she simply does not deserve anyone's vote.

  4. Is Nuclear Power Really Too Expensive?
    by Kevin D Williamson
    One of the ways you can tell when Democrats are out of even remotely plausible arguments is that they turn to cost. They never give a damn what anything costs, until they’ve run out of reasons to hate whatever it is they hate for whatever reason: military projects, school-choice programs, etc.
    You’ll recall congressional Democrats raising an unholy fuss over the fact that the Benghazi investigation cost a little over $4 million; the federal government currently spends about $7 million a minute, 24/7/365. You could fund a dozen Benghazi investigations with whatever the government spends in the time it takes Hillary Rodham Clinton to find her glasses on the nightstand at 4 a.m.
    No surprise then to find our friends at ThinkProgress (h/t Heather Boulware) arguing that nuclear power, the cleanest form of reliable electricity generation currently known to man, is just “too expensive” to play a role in reducing carbon-dioxide emissions in the campaign against global warming. About that: The International Energy Agency forecasts the price of switching to low-carbon energy sources at $44 trillion over the next 35 years or so. You could build a lot of nuclear plants for $44 trillion.
    How many? ThinkProgress cites a study that nuclear “decarbonization” would require building about 115 new nuclear plants a year between now and 2050. If we take the IEA’s $44 trillion and divide it by the total number of new plants in that scenario, that’s about $11 billion per new nuclear plant, which is a bit more than they average now. (Never mind, for the moment, that the cost of building a new nuclear plant is a relatively small part of the cost of building a new nuclear plant, regulatory payoffs and the like representing an enormous share of the expense.) Looks like a few billion left over for spillage, to me.
    I don’t know whether nuclear power is the right solution to our future power needs; I am generally suspicious of the notion that there is a single “right” solution, and deeply suspicious of the notion that politicians and activists are well-positioned to discern it should it exist. But we are constantly being told that there is no price too high to pay to prevent global warming . . . except whatever it costs to build nuclear plants that progressives hate for reasons that have nothing to do with cost.
  5. Following his executive actions this week, President Obama will participate in what CNN is calling a "town hall" style discussion about gun control at George Mason University tomorrow night. The one hour show will be hosted by CNN anchor Anderson Cooper and airs live at 8 p.m eastern.

     

    But according to a memo sent to faculty and students by GMU Communications and Marketing Vice President Renell Wynn earlier this week, participation in the town hall is by invite only. There are no tickets available to people who are not specifically invited to the event.

     

    "This is an invitation-only event. No tickets are available," the memo states. "The event is not open to the public."

     

     

     

    newspeak-dictionary1.jpg Town Hall Meeting = The event is not open to the public

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    PS: The Bonnies play there tonight....Go Bonas !

  6.  

     

    They listed this as one of her "Top Five" accomplishments.....................................really ?

     

    5. Texts From Hillary

    In 2012, Clinton became an internet sensation because of a series of memes depicting her having fictitious, comical text exchanges with other celebrities while wearing her trademark sunglasses. Texts from Hillary became so popular that Clinton herself submitted her own caption to the website and invited its creators to meet with her at the State Department. Her star power and ability to capture the imagination of individuals around the world is one noteworthy aspect of her success.

     

     

     

     

    giphy.gif

  7. Obamacare subsidies may have gone to non-paying customers

     

    The Obama administration can't verify that Obamacare subsidies were withheld from customers who didn't pay their health insurance premiums, according to a new inspector general report released Wednesday.

     

    The earnings-based subsidies go to low- to middle-income Americans to help make their premiums more affordable — but those customers are expected to pay a share out of their own pockets. But the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services doesn't have an effective process to ensure customers are covering their part of the bill, the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services found.

     

    Instead, CMS is relying on insurers selling the plans to verify that the customers are paying their premiums and are even eligible to receive them, the oversight agency said.

     

    "CMS could not ensure that [advanced tax credit] payments made to [qualified health plan] issuers were only for enrollees who had paid their premiums," the agency wrote.

     

    To ensure the subsidies go only to those who pay their premiums, the inspector general recommended that CMS establish its own verification process instead of relying on insurers.

     

    In its response, the agency agreed that it should set up its own verification system.

     

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obamacare-subsidies-may-have-gone-to-non-paying-customers/article/2579717

     

     

    Perhaps, that should have been done from the beginning ?

  8. Obama Quietly Prepares to Transfer Prisoners From Gitmo

     

    While Obama cried for TV cameras yesterday, his administration was putting the finishing touches on a plan to transfer up to 17 prisoners from Guantanamo Bay. This has been in the works for a while.

     

    Catherine Herridge of FOX News reported Monday:

    Source: ‘Al Qaeda followers’ among 17 being transferred from Gitmo

    The group of 17 detainees expected to be transferred out of Guantanamo Bay as early as this week includes “multiple bad guys” and “Al Qaeda followers,” a source who has reviewed the list told Fox News.

    Little is known publicly about which prisoners are being prepared for transfer, but the Obama administration has notified Congress it plans to ship out 17 detainees – some of whom could be transferred within days.

     

     

    (more…)

  9. Oregon Standoff Reveals There Is No Adult Supervision of Federal Agencies in the West
    Over the past two decades . . . government officials, and perhaps [others], entered into a literal, intentional conspiracy to deprive [the family members] not only of their [grazing] permits but also of their vested water rights. This behavior shocks the conscience.” These are not the words of the embattled Hammond family in Harney County, Ore., nor their noisy defenders who made headlines with their illegal occupation of a few buildings at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge — actions the Hammonds do not support — nor even conservatives who see another Sagebrush Rebellion spreading across the American West.
    Instead, they are the thoughtful words of Nevada chief federal district-court judge Robert C. Jones in a painstakingly thorough 104-page decision in May 2013 following a 21-day trial held in 2012 in Reno. Judge Jones ruled in a lawsuit filed pro se by Wayne N. Hage, defending the estate of E. Wayne Hage, his father, against two huge federal land-management agencies — the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service — and their employees, all represented by scores of lawyers from the Department of Justice, the Department of the Interior, and the Department of Agriculture. (The federal lawyers’ appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit was argued last month.) As National Review’s David French has chronicled, the Hammond travails over the decades mirror the fearful path trod by the late Wayne Hage and his family, except for the substitution in the Hammonds’ case of yet another federal land-management agency, the Fish and Wildlife Service, which runs the national wildlife refuge surrounding their ranch.
    Unfortunately, federal agencies’ abuse of the citizenry is not uncommon

    {snip}
    That federal lawyers have “run amok,” much like the bureaucrats they defend, is evident, not just from my experience, but also from the fact that the Hammonds were charged, not with trespassing on 140 acres of federal property with the backfire they started to protect their land, but with terrorism! The Oregon district-court judge trying the case saw the outrage and the injustice but was reversed by a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit.
    Meanwhile, where were senior officials at the U.S. Department of Justice and where were their overseers in Congress, which had ample opportunity to question the legal proceedings in Oregon during the confirmation of Attorney General Loretta Lynch? Silent as always!
    No wonder fury builds at the injustice being done in the West


  10. cry.jpg?w=479

     

     

    Montage: In 33-Minute Speech on Guns, Obama Refers to Himself 76 Times

     

    While announcing his new executive actions on guns, President Obama spoke today about the pain of having to give speeches after mass shootings. He also spoke about meeting Gabby Giffords shortly after she was shot, and noted that she opened her eyes for the first time just an hour after his visit.

     

    He spoke about his support for the Second Amendment, his background as a constitutional law professor, his critics, his frequent trouble locating his iPad, and perhaps most memorably, his anger when thinking about child victims of mass shootings.

     

    If it's starting to sound like Obama made frequent mention of himself, that’s because he did.

     

    In total, we counted 76 references to himself during his 33-minute address.

     

    (Note that in arriving at this calculation, we included mentions of "we" when he was clearly including himself as part of the plural pronoun; the many uses of "we" in referring to America at large were not included. "Me," "myself," and "our" were also included. )

     

     

     

    Why our President hasn't been so moved and cried in public since..............................................................

     

    Oh yeah, last week when Aretha sang at the Kennedy Honors...................... :lol:

     

     

    aretha-franklin-and-obama.jpgAretha Franklin brings President Obama to tears with 'Natural Woman' performance

  11. TWEET of the Day:

     

    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/01/05/hillary-clinton-i-know-right-where-the-oval-office-is/

     

    Hillary Clinton in Sioux City today;

     

    I’m a progressive who likes to get things done.” She finished with a nod to her long experience. “And I will get into that White House. I don’t need a tour. I know right where the Oval Office is.”

     

     

     

     

    601NbzQt_normal.jpg Don Surber @donsurber

    @danmericaCNN @instapundit Big deal. So does Monica Lewinsky

     

  12. Obama’s Executive Actions on Guns Will Help . . . . . . . . .Obama
    This much can be said for President Barack Obama’s executive decrees on gun control: By shifting some federal funds into intervention for the mentally ill, he at least acknowledges, in some small part, one of the key problems. As for the rest . . .

    President Obama will seek to rejigger some of the licensing rules in such a way as to cause some casual sellers of firearms to fall within the federal definition of “firearms dealer,” and thus oblige them to obtain federal dealers’ licenses and to perform background checks before selling a gun. What kind of well-thought-out criteria will the government use to determine that somebody is a firearms dealer under federal law? Whether he has a business card is one consideration (really) and whether he processes credit cards is another. Given the ubiquity of credit-card-processing technology attached to mobile phones, this could very well present a significant expansion of the legal definition of firearms dealer under federal law.
    The president insists that he is acting within preexisting statutory authority; he has been wrong about that before, and the inevitable litigation may show him to be wrong this time around, too: The relevant statutes make no reference to such considerations as the president is putting forward.
    {snip}
    But all of this is far too much detail for President Obama, who thrives off one thing and one thing only: an enemy.
    In this case, the president has calculated that having the National Rifle Association as a foil in the final year of his failed presidency will provide some lubrication as he endeavors to jam his presidential legacy into the body politic.
    That won’t prevent much crime or secure treatment for any mentally ill Americans, but President Obama has always been at the top of President Obama’s agenda.

×
×
  • Create New...