Jump to content

B-Man

Community Member
  • Posts

    69,611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by B-Man

  1. This is quite a development: the US government just made a direct payment to the Iranian government of $1.7 billion.

    "So, nuclear deal implemented. American families reunited. The third piece of this work that we got done this weekend involved the United States and Iran resolving a financial dispute that dated back more than three decades. Since 1981, after our nations severed diplomatic relations, we’ve worked through a international tribunal to resolve various claims between our countries. The United States and Iran are now settling a longstanding Iranian government claim against the United States government. Iran will be returned its own funds, including appropriate interest, but much less than the amount Iran sought," Obama said.

    That payout to Iran from the United States? $1.7 billion.

    Secretary of State John Kerry said today that the settlement is $400 million debt and $1.3 billion in interest dating back to the Islamic revolution.

     

    That's separate from the sanctions windfall Iran will receive.

     

     

     

     

    AP_336523169796.sized-770x415xc.jpg

     

    YI4gl12-_bigger.pngThe White HouseVerified account @WhiteHouse 7h7 hours ago

    "We have now cut off every single path that Iran could have used to build a bomb." —@POTUS #IranDeal

     

     

    They will never dare risk our fearsome arsenal of strongly-worded condemnations

    "Until Saturday, Obama had never granted a pre-trial pardon to anyone, nor had his predecessor, Pres George W. Bush"

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/01/iran-deal-obama-grants-clemency-to-seven-217879#ixzz3xWTruu7y

    Hope and Change............ :thumbdown:

  2. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/us/politics/hillary-clinton-regrets-not-attacking-bernie-sanders-earlier-her-allies-say.html?_r=0

    She now regrets not going all Clinton on Bern earlier. She must have not thought much of him and too much of herself being the entitled presumptive candidate to bother to give him the regular foe-of-a-Clinton treatment. Her people probably poo-pooed Bernie's candidacy never thinking that he could be a serious challenger.

     

    I hope she does take the gloves off and go after him, because it'll be a delight to see her twisting into new contorted forms to try to appeal more to the far left while leaving what few centrist dems remaining to gulp in disbelief. I hope she gets completely desperate and that it shows. She's an elitist phony of the first order of magnitude.

     

     

    "It's a sad commentary that Hilary Clinton's campaign sees her mistake as a failure to 'undercut' Bernie Sanders..."

    "... rather than a failure to realize just how desperately many people are seeking what Bernie has to offer. She had a lot of time to get out in front of that parade."

     

    The second-highest rated comment — with 1230 recommendations — at a NYT article

  3. Xk72orYA_bigger.jpgJay SolomonVerified account @WSJSolomon 3h3 hours ago

    .@JohnKerry says two tracks of diplomacy -- nuclear and prisoners -- "not related." But then says it was.

     

    UiXKV85L_bigger.jpeg Omri Ceren@cerenomri 5h5 hours ago

    Omri Ceren Retweeted Jay Solomon

    Genuine question: why is Kerry even going through the pretense? Not a single reporter in the room believes him.

     

    j05xET-V_bigger.jpegKatherine MillerVerified account @katherinemiller 4h4 hours ago

    Clinton: "The treatment of our Navy sailors earlier this week was offensive, including the release of a demeaning and provocative video."

     

    Why..................she must be a "warmonger"...................right Lefties ?

  4. QUESTION ASKED AND ANSWERED:

     

    “Can D.C. afford a $15/hour minimum wage?”, the left-leaning Brookings Institute asked in July.

     

    Yesterday’s Washington Post article headlined “District leaders furious Walmart breaking promise to build stores in poor neighborhoods” is a succinct response:

     

    Evans said that, behind closed doors, Walmart officials were more frank about the reasons the company was downsizing. He said the company cited the District’s rising minimum wage, now at $11.50 an hour and possibly going to $15 an hour if a proposed ballot measure is successful in November. He also said a proposal for legislation requiring D.C. employers to pay into a fund for family and medical leave for employees, and another effort to require a minimum amount of hours for hourly workers were compounding costs and concerns for the retailer.

    “They were saying, ‘How are we going to run the three stores we have, let alone build two more?’ ” Evans said.

    “The optics of this are horrible; they are not going to build the stores east of the river, in largely African American neighborhoods? That’s horrible; you can’t do that,” Evans said. “A deal’s a deal.”

     

     

    As Tim Worstall responds at Forbes,“Obviously, the people who brokered the deal aren’t happy about this. Yet those same people are the very people that passed the laws that Walmart, informally at least, is saying have led to the change of mind. It is, obviously, always nice to see the biter bit, someone hoist on their own petard. But the people who will lose out from this are the consumers of those poorer areas of the capital. And the reason they’ll lose out is because the politicians have been loading costs onto Walmart by insisting upon higher wages in several different ways.

     

     

    Related: Early evidence suggests that DC’s minimum wage law is also having a negative effect on the city’s restaurant employment.

  5. JUST IN: Hillary Clinton calls for new sanctions on Iran http://hill.cm/V6yLkHv pic.twitter.com/PzrYdwCmYp

    CY4NX2aWwAAOQO-.jpg
    3:26 PM - 16 Jan 2016 · Details
    67 retweets 22 likes

     

     

    So in her Iran statement Hillary decides to sound tougher than Obama & Kerry rather than contrast with Republicans.

     

    DEM lemmings' circuits overloading with confusion. Dear Leader says Iran good; the First Uterus says Iran bad.

     

    Hypocrisy.........anyone ?

     

     

     

    .

  6. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/wisconsin-high-school-chant-ban_56965df3e4b09dbb4bad5923

     

    To underscore just how inane some of these recommendations are, here’s a complete list of the exact words and actions that the WIAA considers “sportsmanship infractions.”

    1. Booing of any kind (Reminder, this is a Sporting event)
    2. “Over-rated” chant
    3. “Scoreboard” cheer
    4. “Air ball” chant
    5. “Nuts n’ Bolts…” chant
    6. “You, You, You” chant
    7. “You can’t do that,” “fund-a-mentals,” “We can’t hear you,” “Warm up the bus” chants
    8. “Sieve, sieve, sieve” chant
    9. “Nah, nah, hah, nah...hey-eyy goodbye” song; “Season’s Over” chant
    10. “Push it, push it, push it” chant
    11. “U-S-A, U-S-A, U-S-A” or any acronym of derogatory language or innuendo (U-S-A is not allowed ?)
    12. Any chants/comments that are disrespectful to an opponent or official, including school mascot, school nickname, school population, opponent’s town or community or that is derogatory to an individual because of race, gender, creed, body type or ability
    13. Holding up papers or props during opponent introductions
    14. Turning backs to court/field during opponent introductions (LOL...........now that is coddling)
    15. Dressing in attire that is not associated with school spirit or is inappropriate
    16. Waving arms or making movements or sudden noises in an attempt to distract an opponent
    17. Fan participation activities while the game is actually being played (i.e. roller coaster, the wave, etc.)
    18. Competitors not shaking hands after a contest
    19. Competitors “trash-talking” before, during or after a contest
    20. Competitors celebrating a play excessively by beating on chest; pointing to the crowd; dancing; or a movement perceived to be drawing attention to one’s self (let's see them enforce that at some schools)
    21. Competitors celebrating a play by prolonged staring at an opponent, or standing over an opponent
    22. Criticizing or diminishing the efforts or abilities of an opponent or official in the media before during or after a contest
    23. Criticizing teammates or coaches
    24. Not standing at attention during the National Anthem or excessive talking, chanting, yelling or movement during the playing/singing of the anthem
    25. Throwing of any object by fans or competitors throwing/hitting equipment (pucks, balls, bats, helmets, etc.)
    26. Body passing
    27. Damaging any property (bleachers, hotel rooms, locker rooms, etc.) associated with a sporting event
    28. Attending an event inebriated or under the influence of mood altering substances
    29. Bare-chested fans and body paint at indoor events
  7. HISD board votes to rename 4 schools named after Confederate loyalists

     

    The Houston school board voted 5-4 Thursday to rename four campuses named after Confederate loyalists and postponed decisions on four others amid community concerns.

     

    Trustees agreed to kickstart the process of renaming Henry Grady, Richard Dowling and Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson middle schools and Robert E. Lee High School.

     

    Now, a committee at each school, including a teacher, student, parent and alumni, will be charged with proposing a new name. The policy calls for the superintendent then to make recommendations to the board for a vote – to take place in May, according to the meeting agenda.

     

    Board president Rhonda Skillern-Jones had included eight schools on the list for renaming, but trustees agreed to remove four – Lanier and Johnston middle schools and Davis and Reagan high schools – to allow for more discussion. Trustees who represent those four schools made motions to exclude them.

     

    http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/HISD-board-votes-to-rename-4-schools-named-after-6760140.php?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

  8. It wouldn't even take 72 hours.

     

    As soon as a few observant people realize it's an emp within the first few hours (independent electronic systems would fail simultaneously, electric grid, cell phones, utilities, modern cars etc, unless electronics were protected in a faraday cage) the observant people who understood the scope of the disaster would be looting within the first 6 hours to start hording supplies then when panic sets in the masses would be looting by the end of day 1.

     

    But whatever I'm getting way off topic here

     

     

    No you're not, looting and hoarding, that's the GOP isn't it............................. :w00t:

     

     

     

    By the way, this laughable criticism of Ted Cruz's "New York values" remark by the 'experts' is funny

     

    If your reaction to "New York values" was anything other than "what an effective insult" you fail politics 101.

  9. LOL...........

     

    Not Too Obvious: Coordinated Democratic Talking Point On GOP Debate, ‘Sons Of Immigrants’ ‘Against Immigrants’

     

    Screen-Shot-2016-01-15-at-12.00.42-AM-55

     

    Mother Jones writer:

    Elite Daily writer:

    NY Times columnist:

    Political Strategist, CNN, Former DNC chair:

    Daughter of Nancy Pelosi:

    Journalist at Grasswire:

    Op Ed writer for El Nuevo:

    Digital media, Harvard:

     

     

     

     

     

     

    WHY, IT’S ALMOST AS IF THERE’S A SORT OF TALKING POINTS LIST FOR JOURNALISTS. OR A JOURNALISTS’ LIST. OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

  10. Hillary Was Interviewed on Lifetime and It Was the Worst Thing Ever
    by Katherine Timpf

     

    Original Article

     

     

    Last night, Hillary Clinton was interviewed on a Lifetime show called “The Conversation” by host Amanda de Cadenent and a bunch of “YouTube stars,” and I must admit that it wasn’t as bad as I expected it to be. It was much, much worse. Earlier this week, Politico touted the interview as something that would be “showing off a softer side” of Mrs. Clinton. In other words: It would be her campaign’s 9 billionth attempt at humanizing her, an attempt to get voters excited about Hillary the Gal and not just Hillary the Candidate. There’s just one problem: Hillary is Hillary is not an exciting person. I’m a young and energetic insomniac, but this “interview” had me wanting to pass out before 11 p.m., and had I not been repeatedly jarred awake by the urge to vomit in disgust, I’m sure that I would have done just that.

    More at the link...............

     

     

    lifetime.png?w=300&h=226

  11. One would wish that Mr. Trump would criticize Hillary Clinton as consistently as he does others .

     

     

    Of, I know better than to hope for that at a GOP debate tonight, but maybe out on the stump..........okay Donald.

     

     

     

     

     

    Fox Debate Main Stage: Three Insurgent and Three Establishment Candidates

    breitbart.com ...

  12. Hillary Attacks Bernie on Healthcare after Thanking Him on Healthcare
    An interesting development from the last week: Hillary Clinton, apparently Feelin’ the Bern in Iowa and New Hampshire, has been attacking Bernie Sanders from the right.
    “His plan would take Medicare and Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program and the Affordable Care Act health care insurance and private employer health insurance and he would take that all together and send health insurance to the states, turning over your and my health insurance to governors,” Clinton said, criticizing the Vermont socialist senator for his plan to turn the U.S. health-care system into a single-payer plan.
    Even Chelsea has hit Bernie on the issue — indicating that this is a coordinated response from the Clintonistas — telling a New Hampshire audience on Tuesday, “Senator Sanders wants to dismantle Obamacare, dismantle the CHIP program, dismantle Medicare, and dismantle private insurance.”
    Wow. Do the Clintons have Bernie confused with Ted Cruz?
    But Sanders’s camp hasn’t hesitated to hit back, tweeting out an old picture of a certain someone thanking him for his “commitment to real health care access for all Americans.”
    CYnXnjPWsAA9ZSi.jpg
    Good response by Bernie's gang..............they understand Social Media better............I suspect, neither candidate does
×
×
  • Create New...