Jump to content

B-Man

Community Member
  • Posts

    68,909
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by B-Man

  1. 8 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    I'm a voter.  I care a great deal.  So do es literally every voter I know.  Why do MAGA's need to lie so much?  This is like the 7 stages of grief for you fools.  We're nearly done with denial....

     

     

    You know I was quoting a CNN report that shows that the majority of voters don't consider it a priority. Right ?

     

    Save your standard "oh those MAGA fools" screed for when it is appropriate Goosie.

     

     

    .

     

  2.  

     

    Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy puts it this way:

     

    Ordinarily, falsifying business records is a misdemeanor under New York penal law. The statute that enhances the offense into a felony requires proof of fraudulent intent to conceal “another crime.” New York’s constitution forbids such vague incorporation by reference; to be valid the statute would have to prescribe what other crimes trigger the felony enhancement. That is especially true in this case, in which Bragg (a) is claiming the other crime is a violation of FECA, for which Congress has vested the Justice Department and the Federal Election Commission with exclusive enforcement jurisdiction, and (b) is alternatively claiming the other crime is a misdemeanor violation of New York election law. In New York, misdemeanors have a two-year statute of limitations, and the potential penalty is less than a year’s imprisonment; yet Bragg is claiming that if one falsifies records (misdemeanor) to unlawfully influence an election (misdemeanor), the prosecutor can somehow inflate the crime into a felony with a four-year prison term and a six-year statute of limitations. If the business-records-falsification statute were intended to allow such a counterintuitive result, it was incumbent on the legislature to spell that out. Empire State lawmakers did not do so.

     

    Then there is the indictment. It put the defense on no notice of what “other crime” Trump was alleged to have concealed. As I contended yesterday, this was not an oversight; Bragg knew it would be controversial to proclaim in clear terms the power and intention to enforce federal law — against a defendant whom the federal agencies with authority to prosecute investigated and as to whom they decided, for sound legal reasons, not to bring charges. The failure to provide a defendant with notice of the charges in the indictment violates the federal Constitution — and it strongly suggests that the grand jury did not find probable cause of the other crimes that Bragg now alleges (there is no “other crime” pled in the indictment).

     

    McCarthy adds this (emphasis in original):

     

    Without being limited to the charges in the indictment, as prosecutors are supposed to be, they presented the case to the jury as if the charge were conspiracy to influence the 2016 election by burying politically damaging information.

     

    To say that this conspiracy appears nowhere in the indictment does not explain the half of it. It is not a crime to conspire to influence an election unless one does so by unlawful means (that’s the afore-described New York misdemeanor), and there is nothing unlawful per se about burying politically damaging information.

     

    https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/05/choose-one-from-column-a.php

     

     

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  3.  

     

    I am not as big a fan of Nikki Haley as a lot of Republicans, but this was well done:


    Despite other politicians from both sides denouncing the country’s aggressive offensive in Gaza, including democrat and fellow Israel supporter Chuck Schumer, Ms Haley has repeatedly rushed to Israel’s defense.

     

    On Tuesday, she visited an artillery post on the country’s northern border and wrote on a shell: “Finish them! America [loves] Israel. Always. Nikki Haley.”

     

    36jogikg_nikki-haley-_625x300_29_May_24.

     

     

    https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/05/hurray-for-haley.php

     

     

     

  4.  

     

    Anyone surprised ?

     

    US economic growth last quarter is revised down from 1.6% rate to 1.3%, but consumers kept spending

    Associated Press, by Paul Wiseman

     

    Washington — The U.S. economy grew at a sluggish 1.3% annual pace from January through March, the weakest quarterly rate since the spring of 2022, the government said Thursday in a downgrade from its previous estimate.

     

    Consumer spending rose but at a slower pace than previously thought.

     

    The Commerce Department had previously estimated that the nation’s gross domestic product — the total output of goods and services — expanded at a 1.6% rate last quarter. The first quarter’s GDP growth marked a sharp slowdown from the vigorous 3.4% rate in the final three months of 2023.

     

     

    https://apnews.com/article/economy-growth-inflation-gdp-consumers-federal-reserve-a6c0086a4a55111c38939bf6cfa0db79

     

    .

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...