Kemp

I have to go out for a while. It's been fun exposing you. Will continue later. Sincerely, Me

It's sad to watch someone crumble under such minimal pressure. Nah, it's not all that sad. He is good at pasting memes, though.

Uh-oh. We are getting closer. "Real investigative journalism is done by small independents and former reporters whom work on their own these days". Finally, a hint. Name some. At least than we can examine these independents and former reporters. Thanks for at least bringing us a little closer to what I'm trying to find out. Please follow through. I appreciate it.

One source. I don't think you can do it. By now, even your supporters must be wondering why you can't name one reliable source. I realize that at this point that multiple sources would be too much to ask for, but one? Of course, you could continue to scream Asshat and post memes. You are melting down.

Anyone else notice that he still hasn't listed a single source. What is he afraid of?

Another non-answer. What are you afraid of? Is it possible you are incapable of answering? I promise Rhino won't call you an Asshat.

t's fun watching you unravel. Keep on Asshatting.

That is just false. It's not his geo-political stance I question. I question his known, factual monetary ties to Russia, including his having to turn to Russian banks for financing help because American banks were tired of getting stiffed by him. It's his dealings in real estate with so many Russians and that in lieu of these things that his policies towards Russia and Putin differ from almost every other single person in government for many years. News of his financial involvements with Russia did not come from the "Deep State". They came from his own son.

Others have insulted me, but that's not important. Why is it so difficult for all of you to actually name at least one of these multiple outlets? I'm not saying they don't exist or they are wrong. Instead of one of you giving me a couple names, it's turned into endless pages of insults and telling me I'm lazy or stupid. It's hard to come up with a reason to not list the good multiple outlets in order to get past this impasse. It seems that people are afraid to list them because they fear it might open up a discussion that they are afraid of having. Is there another reason? The only stated reason is because I am to be punished for not reading about it elsewhere. That seems childish to me. You seem to be aware of these trustworthy outlets. Why not list a couple? I really don't understand. What do you lose by naming a couple? It's not your time, because you've spent far more time not answering. What is the big deal about all of this? Rhino, rather than doing so, has been reduced to flailing Asshat memes. What is it you people fear?

Shocked to see more insults from you. So, who is reporting the truth? If you ever decide to answer, we can continue. Wonder why someone who prides himself on being analytical likes saying "Asshat" instead of telling us where to find the real truth. If you take a second and cite specific reliable sources we can at least discuss it. All I've seen in the last few pages are insults and your posting of opinions by other sources. Is this what you mean by reliable sources?

There you have it boys and girls. Insults without answers. Again. Says he's done. Maybe. Maybe not.

Okay, I'm too lazy to wade through tons of material. Why are all of you too lazy to respond with a couple of sentences?

Are you talking about Fox?

It avoided answering. I guess I should be used to it. What's particularly amusing that there is at least one source I know Rhino would like to cite that I respect. Perhaps the problem is that they write other things that also work against his narrative.

Did I say that anywhere in that post or anywhere else? I asked very specific questions. It's okay to not answer but posing a nonsensical question in response is pretty puzzling.

You are woefully mistaken by Rhino's stated standards. He has never said this is specific to the NY Times.

I thought you guys only liked facts, not opinions.

Geez, was that so hard? Now you have finally answered the question as to who specifically is reporting the truth about all of this. "Many places" are reporting the truth. Ya can't get more specific than that. Deeply appreciated. It's clear as swamp water.

You should have learned by now that insulting me instead of answering gets you nowhere.

On the 4th try he comes up empty, again. It's like watching someone who can't hit a foul shot.

Translation: I don't want to write 10 words to answer so I'll write 60 or so words to show that I won't waste my time.

What is the goal of the investigation of Trump, in your opinion? If it is to have him removed from office, do you believe Pence is part of the conspiracy against Trump or is he innocent in all this? Who or what is the driving force? This driving force would have to have someone or something pulling the strings. Something this big cannot happen organically. Your contentions remind me of the Bilderberger story. Is it connected? I am beginning to understand your point of view. However, even if you are right, it should seem readily apparent to you that on a separate track Trump has been acting as an ally towards Putin for no readily apparent reason, or do you dispute the existence of this separate track? If you do, it's most difficult to take you as a serious investigator and scholar in the political arena. Is all negative news reported regarding Trump in the MSM fabricated? Is the MSM part of the conspiracy or a useful idiot? Do you similarly believe that Trump's repeated attempts to lessen sanctions on Russia is his view of good policy for America? If you claim he has not attempted to lessen the sanctions, there is no point to going forward with the discussion, for obvious reasons. Sorry, but your stance on all of this leads me to these other related questions. Fusion GPS was originally hired by the Republicans. What happened afterwards is a direct result of Trump defeating his Republican rivals. They no longer had a desire to go after Trump because they preferred him to Hillary, so they dropped it.

I looked through this post of yours where you claim to have now answered for a third time. You wrote: "This now the THIRD time I've answered. Either you're being purposefully obtuse or you need to really sharpen your reading comprehension skills by 10 fold". If you answered it here in this post, I don't see it.

I asked who is reporting the truth better than the MSM. This is the second time you responded without answering. I keep reading that the MSM is omitting things. Who isn't omitting things in any part of any media? A response to that would at least provide a starting point to discuss. So far, all I've seen here is that Rhino and anonymous sources are disputing the MSM reporting.

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/here-s-why-the-united-states-needs-nato